{"title":"[动物计数]。","authors":"O. Koehler","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt20q1t4d.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"317.1 Background Neither the PHS Policy nor the Animal Welfare Act Regulations (AWAR) explicitly require an institutional mechanism to track animal usage by investigators under IACUC approved activities, but both require that applications to the IACUC specify and include a rationale for the approximate number of animals proposed to be used (AWAR §2.31,e,1; §2.31,e,2; PHS Policy IV,D,1,b; Guide p. 25) and implicitly require mechanisms to monitor and document the number of animals acquired or produced and used in approved activities. This expectation includes any number of animals that are kept for breeding purposes, produced and culled prior to research use and not subjected to any experimental manipulations, held in unassigned pools, or used in field research. The use of dogs and cats specifically requires that acquisition and disposition records be maintained in compliance with federal law (AWAR §2.35,b,1– §2.35,b,7 8). The AWAR require that annual use of regulated species be reported by pain/distress category (AWAR §2.36,b,5–§2.36,b,8), while NIH, through its Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), requires reporting of average daily inventories of animals, by species, in new and renewal Animal Welfare Assurances.","PeriodicalId":73569,"journal":{"name":"Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique","volume":"149 1","pages":"45-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1960-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"114","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Counting in animals].\",\"authors\":\"O. Koehler\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctt20q1t4d.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"317.1 Background Neither the PHS Policy nor the Animal Welfare Act Regulations (AWAR) explicitly require an institutional mechanism to track animal usage by investigators under IACUC approved activities, but both require that applications to the IACUC specify and include a rationale for the approximate number of animals proposed to be used (AWAR §2.31,e,1; §2.31,e,2; PHS Policy IV,D,1,b; Guide p. 25) and implicitly require mechanisms to monitor and document the number of animals acquired or produced and used in approved activities. This expectation includes any number of animals that are kept for breeding purposes, produced and culled prior to research use and not subjected to any experimental manipulations, held in unassigned pools, or used in field research. The use of dogs and cats specifically requires that acquisition and disposition records be maintained in compliance with federal law (AWAR §2.35,b,1– §2.35,b,7 8). The AWAR require that annual use of regulated species be reported by pain/distress category (AWAR §2.36,b,5–§2.36,b,8), while NIH, through its Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), requires reporting of average daily inventories of animals, by species, in new and renewal Animal Welfare Assurances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"45-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1960-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"114\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20q1t4d.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20q1t4d.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 114
摘要
317.1背景小公共卫生政策和动物福利法条例(AWAR)都没有明确要求建立一个机构机制来跟踪IACUC批准活动下研究人员的动物使用情况,但都要求向IACUC申请指定并包括拟使用动物的大致数量的理由(AWAR§2.31,e,1;§2.31 e 2;PHS政策IV,D,1,b;指南第25页),并含蓄地要求建立机制来监测和记录获得或生产并用于核定活动的动物数量。这一预期包括为繁殖目的而饲养的任何数量的动物,在研究使用之前生产和淘汰的动物,不受任何实验操作,在未分配的水池中饲养,或用于实地研究。狗和猫的使用特别要求根据联邦法律保存获取和处置记录(AWAR§2.35,b,1 -§2.35,b, 7.8)。AWAR要求按疼痛/痛苦类别报告受管制物种的年度使用(AWAR§2.36,b,5 -§2.36,b,8),而NIH通过其实验室动物福利办公室(OLAW)要求在新的和更新的动物福利保证中按物种报告动物的平均每日库存。
317.1 Background Neither the PHS Policy nor the Animal Welfare Act Regulations (AWAR) explicitly require an institutional mechanism to track animal usage by investigators under IACUC approved activities, but both require that applications to the IACUC specify and include a rationale for the approximate number of animals proposed to be used (AWAR §2.31,e,1; §2.31,e,2; PHS Policy IV,D,1,b; Guide p. 25) and implicitly require mechanisms to monitor and document the number of animals acquired or produced and used in approved activities. This expectation includes any number of animals that are kept for breeding purposes, produced and culled prior to research use and not subjected to any experimental manipulations, held in unassigned pools, or used in field research. The use of dogs and cats specifically requires that acquisition and disposition records be maintained in compliance with federal law (AWAR §2.35,b,1– §2.35,b,7 8). The AWAR require that annual use of regulated species be reported by pain/distress category (AWAR §2.36,b,5–§2.36,b,8), while NIH, through its Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), requires reporting of average daily inventories of animals, by species, in new and renewal Animal Welfare Assurances.