政治小说:狄德罗的革命解构

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Richard Terdiman
{"title":"政治小说:狄德罗的革命解构","authors":"Richard Terdiman","doi":"10.2307/3090611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diderot died in 1784 and never wrote about the Revolution. Necessarily we see him from the other side of this epochal event. How might we relate to him today? Modernity and postmodernity have regularly been dazzled by Diderot. We have seen our contemporary preoccupations uncannily anticipated in his reflections and representations. Any reader of Jacques le fataliste can recognize just how much the antic textual practices with which Diderot was experimenting in that novel foreshadow familiar postmodernist textual moves. Is this similarity a coincidence? I will claim the contrary. A double relation, of technical inheritance and of shared cultural problematic, links eighteenth-century reflection on \"fiction\" and \"verisimilitude\" to current worries about \"representation,\" \"language,\" and \"textuality.\" My essay seeks to tell a story about the perplexities that occur when culture changes-particularly, about what happens when the changes in question involve a fundamental register through which people make sense of the world. In this case, the register in question is the functioning of representation. In our world of virtuality today, the capacity to deal with fictions seems intrinsic and indispensable to experience. But this was not always so. \"Fiction\" was once a problematic and controversial attainment. During that period of incipience, writers and readers wrestled","PeriodicalId":45911,"journal":{"name":"YALE FRENCH STUDIES","volume":"101 1","pages":"153-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3090611","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Fictions: Revolutionary Deconstructions in Diderot\",\"authors\":\"Richard Terdiman\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3090611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diderot died in 1784 and never wrote about the Revolution. Necessarily we see him from the other side of this epochal event. How might we relate to him today? Modernity and postmodernity have regularly been dazzled by Diderot. We have seen our contemporary preoccupations uncannily anticipated in his reflections and representations. Any reader of Jacques le fataliste can recognize just how much the antic textual practices with which Diderot was experimenting in that novel foreshadow familiar postmodernist textual moves. Is this similarity a coincidence? I will claim the contrary. A double relation, of technical inheritance and of shared cultural problematic, links eighteenth-century reflection on \\\"fiction\\\" and \\\"verisimilitude\\\" to current worries about \\\"representation,\\\" \\\"language,\\\" and \\\"textuality.\\\" My essay seeks to tell a story about the perplexities that occur when culture changes-particularly, about what happens when the changes in question involve a fundamental register through which people make sense of the world. In this case, the register in question is the functioning of representation. In our world of virtuality today, the capacity to deal with fictions seems intrinsic and indispensable to experience. But this was not always so. \\\"Fiction\\\" was once a problematic and controversial attainment. During that period of incipience, writers and readers wrestled\",\"PeriodicalId\":45911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"YALE FRENCH STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"153-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3090611\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"YALE FRENCH STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3090611\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YALE FRENCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3090611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

狄德罗死于1784年,从未写过关于大革命的文章。我们必须从这一划时代事件的另一面来看待他。我们今天会怎么看待他呢?现代性和后现代性经常被狄德罗搞得眼花缭乱。在他的反思和表现中,我们看到了我们当代的关注。任何读过《宿命论者雅克》的人都能意识到,狄德罗在小说中尝试的滑稽的文本实践,预示着我们熟悉的后现代主义文本运动。这种相似是巧合吗?我要说的正好相反。技术继承和共同文化问题的双重关系,将18世纪对“虚构”和“逼真”的反思与当前对“表现”、“语言”和“文本性”的担忧联系起来。我的文章试图讲述一个故事,讲述文化变化时所产生的困惑,特别是当所讨论的变化涉及到人们理解世界的基本范畴时,会发生什么。在这种情况下,所讨论的寄存器是表征的功能。在我们今天的虚拟世界中,处理虚构的能力似乎是体验的内在和不可或缺的。但情况并非总是如此。“虚构”曾经是一个有问题和争议的成就。在那个初期,作家和读者相互角力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Fictions: Revolutionary Deconstructions in Diderot
Diderot died in 1784 and never wrote about the Revolution. Necessarily we see him from the other side of this epochal event. How might we relate to him today? Modernity and postmodernity have regularly been dazzled by Diderot. We have seen our contemporary preoccupations uncannily anticipated in his reflections and representations. Any reader of Jacques le fataliste can recognize just how much the antic textual practices with which Diderot was experimenting in that novel foreshadow familiar postmodernist textual moves. Is this similarity a coincidence? I will claim the contrary. A double relation, of technical inheritance and of shared cultural problematic, links eighteenth-century reflection on "fiction" and "verisimilitude" to current worries about "representation," "language," and "textuality." My essay seeks to tell a story about the perplexities that occur when culture changes-particularly, about what happens when the changes in question involve a fundamental register through which people make sense of the world. In this case, the register in question is the functioning of representation. In our world of virtuality today, the capacity to deal with fictions seems intrinsic and indispensable to experience. But this was not always so. "Fiction" was once a problematic and controversial attainment. During that period of incipience, writers and readers wrestled
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
YALE FRENCH STUDIES
YALE FRENCH STUDIES LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信