神学奖学金，宣誓效忠，宗教自由:避免极端却失去自由

IF 3.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Harvard Law Review Pub Date : 2004-11-01 DOI:10.2307/4093279

D. Laycock

{"title":"神学奖学金，宣誓效忠，宗教自由:避免极端却失去自由","authors":"D. Laycock","doi":"10.2307/4093279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"i. A Realist Introduction to the Discriminatory Funding Cases 174 2. Penalties Versus Refusals To Fund. 175 (a) The Error in the Abortion Analogy: Burden Rights and Neutrality Rights..... 176 (b) Separating Funded and Unfunded Activities 178 3. O ther Lim its to the H olding. ........ 183 (a) Religious Intensity of the Program Where Funds Are Used 184 (b) B ad M otive 187 (c) Speech.. ..... 191 4. The Hazards of Governmental Discretion 195 II. DAVEY AND THE REGULATION CASES 200","PeriodicalId":48320,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Law Review","volume":"118 1","pages":"156-246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4093279","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THEOLOGY SCHOLARSHIPS, THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: AVOIDING THE EXTREMES BUT MISSING THE LIBERTY\",\"authors\":\"D. Laycock\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/4093279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"i. A Realist Introduction to the Discriminatory Funding Cases 174 2. Penalties Versus Refusals To Fund. 175 (a) The Error in the Abortion Analogy: Burden Rights and Neutrality Rights..... 176 (b) Separating Funded and Unfunded Activities 178 3. O ther Lim its to the H olding. ........ 183 (a) Religious Intensity of the Program Where Funds Are Used 184 (b) B ad M otive 187 (c) Speech.. ..... 191 4. The Hazards of Governmental Discretion 195 II. DAVEY AND THE REGULATION CASES 200\",\"PeriodicalId\":48320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Law Review\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"156-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4093279\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/4093279\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4093279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 19

摘要

1 .对歧视性资助案例的现实主义介绍/处罚与拒绝资助。175 (a)堕胎类比中的错误:负担权和中立权.....176 (b)区分已供资活动和未供资活动。哦，那就到H点. ........183 (a)使用资金的项目的宗教强度184 (b) b和M动机187 (c)演讲.. .....191 4。政府自由裁量权的危害[II]。戴维和法规案200

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

THEOLOGY SCHOLARSHIPS, THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: AVOIDING THE EXTREMES BUT MISSING THE LIBERTY

i. A Realist Introduction to the Discriminatory Funding Cases 174 2. Penalties Versus Refusals To Fund. 175 (a) The Error in the Abortion Analogy: Burden Rights and Neutrality Rights..... 176 (b) Separating Funded and Unfunded Activities 178 3. O ther Lim its to the H olding. ........ 183 (a) Religious Intensity of the Program Where Funds Are Used 184 (b) B ad M otive 187 (c) Speech.. ..... 191 4. The Hazards of Governmental Discretion 195 II. DAVEY AND THE REGULATION CASES 200

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors. The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.