亚当·斯密,《自然开采与历史判断:毫无根据的环境遗产》

Q2 Arts and Humanities
J. Cullis
{"title":"亚当·斯密,《自然开采与历史判断:毫无根据的环境遗产》","authors":"J. Cullis","doi":"10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the field of environmental history, assumptions about the development of political and economic ideas have tended to overlook the complex intellectual and historical context that gave rise to them. This article argues that this has certainly been the case in interpretations of Adam Smith by environmental historians. Through drawing on scholarship in intellectual history, this short essay reveals how Smith’s evaluation of natural extraction was directly linked to his conception of political economy. In the process, it also demonstrates a need for environmental historians to reassess Smith’s environmental legacy.","PeriodicalId":34502,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adam Smith, natural extraction and historical judgement: An unwarranted environmental legacy\",\"authors\":\"J. Cullis\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the field of environmental history, assumptions about the development of political and economic ideas have tended to overlook the complex intellectual and historical context that gave rise to them. This article argues that this has certainly been the case in interpretations of Adam Smith by environmental historians. Through drawing on scholarship in intellectual history, this short essay reveals how Smith’s evaluation of natural extraction was directly linked to his conception of political economy. In the process, it also demonstrates a need for environmental historians to reassess Smith’s environmental legacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Environmental History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Environmental History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Environmental History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在环境史领域,关于政治和经济思想发展的假设往往忽视了产生这些思想的复杂的知识和历史背景。本文认为,在环境历史学家对亚当•斯密的解读中,确实存在这种情况。通过借鉴思想史上的学术研究,这篇短文揭示了斯密对自然开采的评价如何与他的政治经济学概念直接联系在一起。在此过程中,它也表明环境历史学家需要重新评估史密斯的环境遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adam Smith, natural extraction and historical judgement: An unwarranted environmental legacy
Within the field of environmental history, assumptions about the development of political and economic ideas have tended to overlook the complex intellectual and historical context that gave rise to them. This article argues that this has certainly been the case in interpretations of Adam Smith by environmental historians. Through drawing on scholarship in intellectual history, this short essay reveals how Smith’s evaluation of natural extraction was directly linked to his conception of political economy. In the process, it also demonstrates a need for environmental historians to reassess Smith’s environmental legacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Environmental History
International Review of Environmental History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信