{"title":"与公民社会妥协","authors":"Heath B. Chamberlain","doi":"10.2307/2949903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cover of this book bears a photograph of Boris Yeltsin addressing an exuberant crowd in Moscow, August 1991. The last page of the text assures us that with 'consistent material and moral support from the liberal world community there is every reason to believe that the development of civil society in the former communist countries will occur sooner rather than later'. Within these brackets of optimism, however, the general outlook of this collection of essays is considerably more cautious and sober. Is 'civil society' indeed taking hold in the former (and present) communist world? Answers are mixed. The contributors are all members of the Australian academic community, and all but one are attached to the Australian National University. The idea for the volume was first raised in early 1989, we are told, initially to explore the Gramscian notion of 'civil society within the bosom of totalitarian systems'. Events of that year and the next, however, rendered the original project largely irrelevant, and its focus eventually shifted to civil society as a potential precursor and bedrock of a new, post-communist order in Europe and Asia. Following a brief introduction by editor Robert P. Miller, the volume includes essays on the USSR (T.H. Rigby), China (David Kelly and He Baogang), Poland and Hungary (Janina Frentzel-Zagorska), the German Democratic Republic (Leslie T. Holmes), Yugoslavia (Miller), and Vietnam (Carlyle A. Thayer). The editor provides a concluding essay. The essays on the former Soviet Union and China provide striking contrasts in focus and tone. Rigby is concerned with 'vestigial elements of civil society' activities relatively autonomous of the command structures of the state, which managed to survive and ultimately thrived as a kind of 'shadow culture' under 'mono-organisational socialism'. Because of these long-term developments, he argues, civil society acquired considerable legitimacy over the years and is now positioned to assert itself. Despite several major obstacles, Rigby concludes, 'the prospects for freedom and democracy within a modern civil society seem almost unprecedentedly bright'.","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"113 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949903","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coming to Terms with Civil Society\",\"authors\":\"Heath B. Chamberlain\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2949903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cover of this book bears a photograph of Boris Yeltsin addressing an exuberant crowd in Moscow, August 1991. The last page of the text assures us that with 'consistent material and moral support from the liberal world community there is every reason to believe that the development of civil society in the former communist countries will occur sooner rather than later'. Within these brackets of optimism, however, the general outlook of this collection of essays is considerably more cautious and sober. Is 'civil society' indeed taking hold in the former (and present) communist world? Answers are mixed. The contributors are all members of the Australian academic community, and all but one are attached to the Australian National University. The idea for the volume was first raised in early 1989, we are told, initially to explore the Gramscian notion of 'civil society within the bosom of totalitarian systems'. Events of that year and the next, however, rendered the original project largely irrelevant, and its focus eventually shifted to civil society as a potential precursor and bedrock of a new, post-communist order in Europe and Asia. Following a brief introduction by editor Robert P. Miller, the volume includes essays on the USSR (T.H. Rigby), China (David Kelly and He Baogang), Poland and Hungary (Janina Frentzel-Zagorska), the German Democratic Republic (Leslie T. Holmes), Yugoslavia (Miller), and Vietnam (Carlyle A. Thayer). The editor provides a concluding essay. The essays on the former Soviet Union and China provide striking contrasts in focus and tone. Rigby is concerned with 'vestigial elements of civil society' activities relatively autonomous of the command structures of the state, which managed to survive and ultimately thrived as a kind of 'shadow culture' under 'mono-organisational socialism'. Because of these long-term developments, he argues, civil society acquired considerable legitimacy over the years and is now positioned to assert itself. Despite several major obstacles, Rigby concludes, 'the prospects for freedom and democracy within a modern civil society seem almost unprecedentedly bright'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949903\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这本书的封面上有一张1991年8月鲍里斯·叶利钦在莫斯科向热情的人群讲话的照片。文本的最后一页向我们保证,“有了自由国际社会一贯的物质和精神支持,我们有充分的理由相信,前共产主义国家的公民社会的发展迟早会到来”。然而,在这些乐观主义的框架内,这本文集的总体观点要谨慎和清醒得多。“公民社会”真的在前(和现在)共产主义世界站稳脚跟了吗?答案是复杂的。作者都是澳大利亚学术界的成员,除一人外,其他人都附属于澳大利亚国立大学。这本书的想法最初是在1989年初提出的,我们被告知,最初是为了探索葛兰西的“极权制度怀抱中的公民社会”的概念。然而,那一年和第二年发生的事件使最初的计划在很大程度上变得无关紧要,它的重点最终转向了公民社会,作为欧洲和亚洲后共产主义新秩序的潜在先驱和基石。在编辑罗伯特·p·米勒(Robert P. Miller)的简短介绍之后,本书包括了关于苏联(T.H. Rigby)、中国(David Kelly和贺宝刚)、波兰和匈牙利(Janina Frentzel-Zagorska)、德意志民主共和国(Leslie T. Holmes)、南斯拉夫(Miller)和越南(Carlyle a . Thayer)的文章。编辑写了一篇结束语。关于前苏联和中国的文章在焦点和语气上形成了鲜明的对比。里格比关注的是相对独立于国家指挥结构的“公民社会的残余元素”活动,这些活动在“单一组织的社会主义”下幸存下来,并最终作为一种“影子文化”蓬勃发展。他认为,由于这些长期发展,公民社会多年来获得了相当大的合法性,现在有能力维护自己的权利。里格比总结道,尽管存在一些主要障碍,“现代公民社会中自由和民主的前景似乎前所未有地光明”。
The cover of this book bears a photograph of Boris Yeltsin addressing an exuberant crowd in Moscow, August 1991. The last page of the text assures us that with 'consistent material and moral support from the liberal world community there is every reason to believe that the development of civil society in the former communist countries will occur sooner rather than later'. Within these brackets of optimism, however, the general outlook of this collection of essays is considerably more cautious and sober. Is 'civil society' indeed taking hold in the former (and present) communist world? Answers are mixed. The contributors are all members of the Australian academic community, and all but one are attached to the Australian National University. The idea for the volume was first raised in early 1989, we are told, initially to explore the Gramscian notion of 'civil society within the bosom of totalitarian systems'. Events of that year and the next, however, rendered the original project largely irrelevant, and its focus eventually shifted to civil society as a potential precursor and bedrock of a new, post-communist order in Europe and Asia. Following a brief introduction by editor Robert P. Miller, the volume includes essays on the USSR (T.H. Rigby), China (David Kelly and He Baogang), Poland and Hungary (Janina Frentzel-Zagorska), the German Democratic Republic (Leslie T. Holmes), Yugoslavia (Miller), and Vietnam (Carlyle A. Thayer). The editor provides a concluding essay. The essays on the former Soviet Union and China provide striking contrasts in focus and tone. Rigby is concerned with 'vestigial elements of civil society' activities relatively autonomous of the command structures of the state, which managed to survive and ultimately thrived as a kind of 'shadow culture' under 'mono-organisational socialism'. Because of these long-term developments, he argues, civil society acquired considerable legitimacy over the years and is now positioned to assert itself. Despite several major obstacles, Rigby concludes, 'the prospects for freedom and democracy within a modern civil society seem almost unprecedentedly bright'.