皮洛斯地区考古项目,第三部分:第二奥斯曼帝国时期威廉·盖尔爵士在皮洛斯的行程和莫里亚地区的景观

IF 0.8 1区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
HESPERIA Pub Date : 2000-07-01 DOI:10.2307/148401
J. Bennet, Jack L. Davis, F. Zarinebaf-Shahr
{"title":"皮洛斯地区考古项目,第三部分:第二奥斯曼帝国时期威廉·盖尔爵士在皮洛斯的行程和莫里亚地区的景观","authors":"J. Bennet, Jack L. Davis, F. Zarinebaf-Shahr","doi":"10.2307/148401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article previews the study of the Second Ottoman period (1715-1821) by members of the Pylos Regional Archaeological Project. By closely comparing Sir William Gell's apparently dispassionate descriptions of the Navarino Bay area with other documentary and archaeological data, we suggest that reconstruction of settlement and land use relying solely on Gell's descriptions can result in misrepresentation. This conclusion has implications for modern Greek social and economic history, since the image that Gell sketches appears to support a commonly held belief that settlement during Ottoman occupation was concentrated in more mountainous areas, while the lowlands were largely devoid of permanent habitation.","PeriodicalId":46513,"journal":{"name":"HESPERIA","volume":"69 1","pages":"343-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/148401","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pylos Regional archaeological project, Part III : Sir William Gell's itinerary in the Pylia and regional landscapes in the morea in the Second Ottoman period\",\"authors\":\"J. Bennet, Jack L. Davis, F. Zarinebaf-Shahr\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/148401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article previews the study of the Second Ottoman period (1715-1821) by members of the Pylos Regional Archaeological Project. By closely comparing Sir William Gell's apparently dispassionate descriptions of the Navarino Bay area with other documentary and archaeological data, we suggest that reconstruction of settlement and land use relying solely on Gell's descriptions can result in misrepresentation. This conclusion has implications for modern Greek social and economic history, since the image that Gell sketches appears to support a commonly held belief that settlement during Ottoman occupation was concentrated in more mountainous areas, while the lowlands were largely devoid of permanent habitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HESPERIA\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"343-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/148401\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HESPERIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/148401\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HESPERIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/148401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文概述了皮洛斯地区考古项目成员对第二奥斯曼帝国时期(1715-1821)的研究。通过将威廉·盖尔爵士对纳瓦里诺湾地区的冷静描述与其他文献和考古数据进行仔细比较,我们认为,仅仅依靠盖尔的描述来重建定居点和土地使用可能会导致歪曲。这一结论对现代希腊社会和经济史具有启示意义,因为Gell所描绘的图像似乎支持了一种普遍持有的信念,即奥斯曼帝国占领期间的定居点集中在更多的山区,而低地基本上没有永久居住。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pylos Regional archaeological project, Part III : Sir William Gell's itinerary in the Pylia and regional landscapes in the morea in the Second Ottoman period
This article previews the study of the Second Ottoman period (1715-1821) by members of the Pylos Regional Archaeological Project. By closely comparing Sir William Gell's apparently dispassionate descriptions of the Navarino Bay area with other documentary and archaeological data, we suggest that reconstruction of settlement and land use relying solely on Gell's descriptions can result in misrepresentation. This conclusion has implications for modern Greek social and economic history, since the image that Gell sketches appears to support a commonly held belief that settlement during Ottoman occupation was concentrated in more mountainous areas, while the lowlands were largely devoid of permanent habitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HESPERIA
HESPERIA ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信