{"title":"今天的失业是结构性的吗?","authors":"J. Delong","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many advocate an end to stimulus and view unemployment as structural. J. Bradford DeLong of UC Berkeley challenges that view.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1789","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Today's Unemployment Structural?\",\"authors\":\"J. Delong\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1553-3832.1789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many advocate an end to stimulus and view unemployment as structural. J. Bradford DeLong of UC Berkeley challenges that view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economists Voice\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1789\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economists Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
期刊介绍:
This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.