评理查森:累进的联邦税收推动了从蓝州到红州的再分配

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2010-10-11 DOI:10.2202/1553-3832.1709

Seth H. Giertz

{"title":"评理查森:累进的联邦税收推动了从蓝州到红州的再分配","authors":"Seth H. Giertz","doi":"10.2202/1553-3832.1709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Richardson documents redistribution from Democratic states to Republican states and links this to the 1994 \"Republican revolution\" -- suggesting a deliberative effort by Republicans to redistribute income towards their constituents. Seth Giertz of the University of Nebraska argues that what Professor Richardson's analysis really shows is that \"red\" states -- but not necessarily Republicans within those states -- are (increasingly) the major beneficiaries of federal redistributive policies -- and that \"blue\" states are (increasingly) the benefactors.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1709","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on Richardson: Progressive Federal Taxation Drives Redistribution from Blue to Red States\",\"authors\":\"Seth H. Giertz\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1553-3832.1709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Richardson documents redistribution from Democratic states to Republican states and links this to the 1994 \\\"Republican revolution\\\" -- suggesting a deliberative effort by Republicans to redistribute income towards their constituents. Seth Giertz of the University of Nebraska argues that what Professor Richardson's analysis really shows is that \\\"red\\\" states -- but not necessarily Republicans within those states -- are (increasingly) the major beneficiaries of federal redistributive policies -- and that \\\"blue\\\" states are (increasingly) the benefactors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economists Voice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1553-3832.1709\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economists Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

理查森教授记录了从民主党州到共和党州的再分配，并将其与1994年的“共和党革命”联系起来——这表明共和党人经过深思熟虑的努力，将收入再分配给他们的选民。内布拉斯加大学(University of Nebraska)的塞思·吉尔茨(Seth Giertz)认为，理查森教授的分析真正表明的是，“红色”州——但不一定是这些州的共和党人——(越来越)是联邦再分配政策的主要受益者，而“蓝色”州(越来越)是受益者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comment on Richardson: Progressive Federal Taxation Drives Redistribution from Blue to Red States

Professor Richardson documents redistribution from Democratic states to Republican states and links this to the 1994 "Republican revolution" -- suggesting a deliberative effort by Republicans to redistribute income towards their constituents. Seth Giertz of the University of Nebraska argues that what Professor Richardson's analysis really shows is that "red" states -- but not necessarily Republicans within those states -- are (increasingly) the major beneficiaries of federal redistributive policies -- and that "blue" states are (increasingly) the benefactors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.