初始和工作美学正畸弓线的力学和表面特性

Tang Yc, Peh Xl, Zakaria Nn, Radzi Z
{"title":"初始和工作美学正畸弓线的力学和表面特性","authors":"Tang Yc, Peh Xl, Zakaria Nn, Radzi Z","doi":"10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to compare mechanical properties and surface characteristics of initial and working aesthetic archwires with their conventional counterparts. High Aesthetic Sentalloy (full rhodium coating nickel-titanium; Dentsply GAC) represented the initial aesthetic archwires; and FLI TRU-CHROME (labial PTFE-coated stainless steel; RMO) as the working aesthetic archwires; together with their conventional counterparts were analysed. A three point bending test was conducted using a universal testing machine (AGS-X SERIES, Shimadzu, Japan) to determine the load-deflection characteristics of archwires. Surface hardness was evaluated by Vickers microhardness test (HMV-FA, Shimadzu, Japan). A 3D Optical Surface Texture Analyzer (ALICONA, InfiniteFocus Real3D, Belgium) and a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, FEI Quanta 250, USA) were used for surface evaluation. Results showed that loaddeflection characteristics of High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires did not differ from its control, whereas FLI TRU-CHROME archwires exhibited higher loading and unloading forces than its counterpart. No statistically significant difference in surface hardness was found between FLI TRU-CHROME and its control archwires. The coating surfaces of both aesthetic archwires were rougher than the non-coated conventional archwires, with similar roughness between non-coated surface of FLI TRU-CHROME archwires and its counterpart. FLI TRU-CHROME archwires showed a distinct coating thickness but coating layer is undefined in High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires. In conclusion, the aesthetic rhodium coated nickel titanium archwire has similar mechanical properties as control nickel titanium archwire without being adversely affected by the addition of the coating layer. The aesthetic coated PTFE stainless steel archwire has higher load response which could be an advantage as rigid wire in working stage of orthodontic treatment. Based on their performance, their use could be recommended in cases where aesthetic aspect is crucial and where the friction aspect is not critical as their surface roughness values increased.","PeriodicalId":75515,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dentistry","volume":"23 1","pages":"17-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical and Surface Properties of Initial and Working Aesthetic Orthodontic Archwires\",\"authors\":\"Tang Yc, Peh Xl, Zakaria Nn, Radzi Z\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to compare mechanical properties and surface characteristics of initial and working aesthetic archwires with their conventional counterparts. High Aesthetic Sentalloy (full rhodium coating nickel-titanium; Dentsply GAC) represented the initial aesthetic archwires; and FLI TRU-CHROME (labial PTFE-coated stainless steel; RMO) as the working aesthetic archwires; together with their conventional counterparts were analysed. A three point bending test was conducted using a universal testing machine (AGS-X SERIES, Shimadzu, Japan) to determine the load-deflection characteristics of archwires. Surface hardness was evaluated by Vickers microhardness test (HMV-FA, Shimadzu, Japan). A 3D Optical Surface Texture Analyzer (ALICONA, InfiniteFocus Real3D, Belgium) and a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, FEI Quanta 250, USA) were used for surface evaluation. Results showed that loaddeflection characteristics of High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires did not differ from its control, whereas FLI TRU-CHROME archwires exhibited higher loading and unloading forces than its counterpart. No statistically significant difference in surface hardness was found between FLI TRU-CHROME and its control archwires. The coating surfaces of both aesthetic archwires were rougher than the non-coated conventional archwires, with similar roughness between non-coated surface of FLI TRU-CHROME archwires and its counterpart. FLI TRU-CHROME archwires showed a distinct coating thickness but coating layer is undefined in High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires. In conclusion, the aesthetic rhodium coated nickel titanium archwire has similar mechanical properties as control nickel titanium archwire without being adversely affected by the addition of the coating layer. The aesthetic coated PTFE stainless steel archwire has higher load response which could be an advantage as rigid wire in working stage of orthodontic treatment. Based on their performance, their use could be recommended in cases where aesthetic aspect is crucial and where the friction aspect is not critical as their surface roughness values increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"17-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ADUM.VOL23NO1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

该研究旨在比较初始和工作美学弓线与常规弓线的机械性能和表面特征。高美学Sentalloy(全铑镀镍钛);Dentsply GAC)代表了最初的美学弧线;和FLI truc - chrome(唇部ptfe涂层不锈钢;RMO)作为工作美学的拱线;与传统对应物一起进行了分析。采用万能试验机(AGS-X SERIES, Shimadzu, Japan)进行三点弯曲试验,以确定弓丝的载荷-挠度特性。表面硬度采用维氏显微硬度测试(HMV-FA, Shimadzu, Japan)。使用三维光学表面纹理分析仪(ALICONA, InfiniteFocus Real3D,比利时)和场发射扫描电子显微镜(FESEM, FEI Quanta 250,美国)进行表面评价。结果表明,高美观性Sentalloy弓丝的载荷偏转特性与对照无明显差异,而FLI truc - chrome弓丝的加载和卸载力均高于对照。FLI truc - chrome与对照弓丝的表面硬度无统计学差异。两种美学弧线的涂层表面都比未涂层的传统弧线更粗糙,未涂层的FLI truc - chrome弧线表面粗糙度与同类产品相似。FLI truc - chrome弧线的镀层厚度明显,但高美学Sentalloy弧线的镀层厚度不明确。综上所述,美学镀铑镍钛弓丝具有与对照镍钛弓丝相似的力学性能,且不受镀层添加的不利影响。美观涂层的聚四氟乙烯不锈钢弓丝具有较高的载荷响应,在正畸治疗的工作阶段作为刚性丝具有优势。基于它们的性能,可以推荐在美观方面至关重要的情况下使用它们,而摩擦方面并不重要,因为它们的表面粗糙度值增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical and Surface Properties of Initial and Working Aesthetic Orthodontic Archwires
The study aimed to compare mechanical properties and surface characteristics of initial and working aesthetic archwires with their conventional counterparts. High Aesthetic Sentalloy (full rhodium coating nickel-titanium; Dentsply GAC) represented the initial aesthetic archwires; and FLI TRU-CHROME (labial PTFE-coated stainless steel; RMO) as the working aesthetic archwires; together with their conventional counterparts were analysed. A three point bending test was conducted using a universal testing machine (AGS-X SERIES, Shimadzu, Japan) to determine the load-deflection characteristics of archwires. Surface hardness was evaluated by Vickers microhardness test (HMV-FA, Shimadzu, Japan). A 3D Optical Surface Texture Analyzer (ALICONA, InfiniteFocus Real3D, Belgium) and a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, FEI Quanta 250, USA) were used for surface evaluation. Results showed that loaddeflection characteristics of High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires did not differ from its control, whereas FLI TRU-CHROME archwires exhibited higher loading and unloading forces than its counterpart. No statistically significant difference in surface hardness was found between FLI TRU-CHROME and its control archwires. The coating surfaces of both aesthetic archwires were rougher than the non-coated conventional archwires, with similar roughness between non-coated surface of FLI TRU-CHROME archwires and its counterpart. FLI TRU-CHROME archwires showed a distinct coating thickness but coating layer is undefined in High Aesthetic Sentalloy archwires. In conclusion, the aesthetic rhodium coated nickel titanium archwire has similar mechanical properties as control nickel titanium archwire without being adversely affected by the addition of the coating layer. The aesthetic coated PTFE stainless steel archwire has higher load response which could be an advantage as rigid wire in working stage of orthodontic treatment. Based on their performance, their use could be recommended in cases where aesthetic aspect is crucial and where the friction aspect is not critical as their surface roughness values increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信