医生作为一个出于良心拒服兵役者。

J. Bleich
{"title":"医生作为一个出于良心拒服兵役者。","authors":"J. Bleich","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.368640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On occasion a conflict arises between a physician's perceived moral obligation not to withhold treatment and a patient's right to refuse treatment. Arguments are cited in support of the position that, with prior notice, the physician's right should prevail. It is further argued that legislative action to remove lingering legal doubt would be appropriate.","PeriodicalId":83028,"journal":{"name":"The Fordham urban law journal","volume":"30 1 1","pages":"245-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The physician as a conscientious objector.\",\"authors\":\"J. Bleich\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.368640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On occasion a conflict arises between a physician's perceived moral obligation not to withhold treatment and a patient's right to refuse treatment. Arguments are cited in support of the position that, with prior notice, the physician's right should prevail. It is further argued that legislative action to remove lingering legal doubt would be appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1 1\",\"pages\":\"245-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.368640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fordham urban law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.368640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

有时,医生不拒绝治疗的道德义务与病人拒绝治疗的权利之间会产生冲突。在事先通知的情况下,医生的权利应该占上风。有人进一步认为,采取立法行动消除挥之不去的法律疑虑是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The physician as a conscientious objector.
On occasion a conflict arises between a physician's perceived moral obligation not to withhold treatment and a patient's right to refuse treatment. Arguments are cited in support of the position that, with prior notice, the physician's right should prevail. It is further argued that legislative action to remove lingering legal doubt would be appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信