挑战种族主义和性别歧视:基因解释的替代方案

E. Tobach, B. Rosoff
{"title":"挑战种族主义和性别歧视:基因解释的替代方案","authors":"E. Tobach, B. Rosoff","doi":"10.2307/2077354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1989, J.P. Rushton presented a paper at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science outlining his now notorious genetics-based theory of brain sizes and alleged racial differences in intelligence. While defenders of Rushton's work have focussed on his right to express any ideas rather than on the content of the work itself, critics have focussed on the scientific flaws in Rushton's work as well as its racist implications. Critical responses to Rushton's ideas have been varied, from condemnation within the academy to student protesters sporting measuring-tape headbands. The Genes and Gender Collective responded to Rushton's work by organizing a symposium at the following AAAS annual meeting, presenting analyses of human behaviour which do not revert to genetic determinism. Challenging Racism and Sexism: Alternatives to Genetic Explanations is a collection of papers that challenge genetic determinist thinking and expose the racism and sexism that often underlie genetic determinism as a theory of human behaviour. Essays in this volume reveal the flawed methodologies and racist and sexist assumptions of genetic determinist theories in various disciplines. Some of the essays analyze the historical events which accompany the resurgence of biological and genetic determinism; others describe the practical impact genetic determinist theories have on women and men in various ethnic communities. The book is divided into three parts. In the first part, assumptions underlying scientific research in biological, physiological and psychological research and clinical psychology practice are discussed. The result is a rich multidisciplinary critique of racist and sexist ideologies as they are expressed in research methodologies and in the interpretation of results. In the first chapter, biologist Ruth Hubbard shows the artificial categories evoked in the genetic discussions of \"racial\" differences. She points out that both the emphasis on genetic differences and the categories for differentiation are suspect. Human genes are relatively homogeneous, and most genes can be found among all ethnic groups and geographical locations. No universally agreed upon definitions exist for racial categories; racial definitions require the singling out of specific bodily characteristics (e.g., skin colour, hair texture) as having explanatory significance even though there is no reason to think that they are relevant to other characteristics like intelligence or behaviour. Likewise, although the numbers of X and Y chromosomes distinguish females and males, these biological differences are often given explanatory power despite the lack of evidence linking these chromosomes to the behavioural differences in question. The arbitrary nature of the body characteristics used to claim racial and sexual superiority of white males is highlighted in the chapter by Kaplan and Rogers which details the history of theory and research on racial differences, from Gobineau's theories of Aryan supremacy, to craniology and lower:upper arm bone-length ratios. Kaplan and Rogers demonstrate clearly that racist and sexist ideologies precede and inform research on racial and sex differences, which is then used to support these ideologies. They give numerous accounts of eminent scientists who discarded their theories of genetically-based morphological differences between ethnic groups and between women and men when the results of these particular measurements violated their presumptions with respect to ethnic and sexual superiority. Woodward's chapter on population genetics is a difficult one for someone who lacks a background in genetics. However, Woodward clearly shows the extreme reductionism required to adhere to a sociobiological, or genetic determinist stance, using a different level of analysis than the other chapters of the book. A glossary of genetic terms is provided which was very helpful for deciphering the chapter and also a helpful resource for evaluating reports of genetic research findings. …","PeriodicalId":82477,"journal":{"name":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","volume":"24 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2077354","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging racism and sexism : alternatives to genetic explanations\",\"authors\":\"E. Tobach, B. Rosoff\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2077354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1989, J.P. Rushton presented a paper at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science outlining his now notorious genetics-based theory of brain sizes and alleged racial differences in intelligence. While defenders of Rushton's work have focussed on his right to express any ideas rather than on the content of the work itself, critics have focussed on the scientific flaws in Rushton's work as well as its racist implications. Critical responses to Rushton's ideas have been varied, from condemnation within the academy to student protesters sporting measuring-tape headbands. The Genes and Gender Collective responded to Rushton's work by organizing a symposium at the following AAAS annual meeting, presenting analyses of human behaviour which do not revert to genetic determinism. Challenging Racism and Sexism: Alternatives to Genetic Explanations is a collection of papers that challenge genetic determinist thinking and expose the racism and sexism that often underlie genetic determinism as a theory of human behaviour. Essays in this volume reveal the flawed methodologies and racist and sexist assumptions of genetic determinist theories in various disciplines. Some of the essays analyze the historical events which accompany the resurgence of biological and genetic determinism; others describe the practical impact genetic determinist theories have on women and men in various ethnic communities. The book is divided into three parts. In the first part, assumptions underlying scientific research in biological, physiological and psychological research and clinical psychology practice are discussed. The result is a rich multidisciplinary critique of racist and sexist ideologies as they are expressed in research methodologies and in the interpretation of results. In the first chapter, biologist Ruth Hubbard shows the artificial categories evoked in the genetic discussions of \\\"racial\\\" differences. She points out that both the emphasis on genetic differences and the categories for differentiation are suspect. Human genes are relatively homogeneous, and most genes can be found among all ethnic groups and geographical locations. No universally agreed upon definitions exist for racial categories; racial definitions require the singling out of specific bodily characteristics (e.g., skin colour, hair texture) as having explanatory significance even though there is no reason to think that they are relevant to other characteristics like intelligence or behaviour. Likewise, although the numbers of X and Y chromosomes distinguish females and males, these biological differences are often given explanatory power despite the lack of evidence linking these chromosomes to the behavioural differences in question. The arbitrary nature of the body characteristics used to claim racial and sexual superiority of white males is highlighted in the chapter by Kaplan and Rogers which details the history of theory and research on racial differences, from Gobineau's theories of Aryan supremacy, to craniology and lower:upper arm bone-length ratios. Kaplan and Rogers demonstrate clearly that racist and sexist ideologies precede and inform research on racial and sex differences, which is then used to support these ideologies. They give numerous accounts of eminent scientists who discarded their theories of genetically-based morphological differences between ethnic groups and between women and men when the results of these particular measurements violated their presumptions with respect to ethnic and sexual superiority. Woodward's chapter on population genetics is a difficult one for someone who lacks a background in genetics. However, Woodward clearly shows the extreme reductionism required to adhere to a sociobiological, or genetic determinist stance, using a different level of analysis than the other chapters of the book. A glossary of genetic terms is provided which was very helpful for deciphering the chapter and also a helpful resource for evaluating reports of genetic research findings. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":82477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2077354\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2077354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2077354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

1989年,j·p·拉什顿在美国科学促进会发表了一篇论文,概述了他现在臭名昭著的基于基因的大脑大小理论和所谓的智力种族差异。拉什顿作品的捍卫者关注的是他表达任何想法的权利,而不是作品本身的内容,而批评者则关注拉什顿作品中的科学缺陷及其种族主义含义。对拉什顿观点的批评反应各不相同,从学院内部的谴责到学生抗议者挥舞着卷尺发带。基因与性别集体对拉什顿的研究做出了回应,在随后的美国科学促进会年会上组织了一次研讨会,展示了对人类行为的分析,这些分析没有回归到基因决定论。挑战种族主义和性别主义:遗传解释的替代方案是一系列论文的集合,这些论文挑战了遗传决定论的思想,并揭露了种族主义和性别歧视,这些种族主义和性别歧视往往是遗传决定论作为人类行为理论的基础。论文在这卷揭示了有缺陷的方法和种族主义和性别歧视的假设遗传决定论理论在各个学科。一些文章分析了伴随生物决定论和基因决定论复苏的历史事件;其他人则描述了基因决定论理论对不同种族社区的女性和男性的实际影响。这本书分为三个部分。第一部分讨论了生物学、生理学和心理学研究以及临床心理学实践的科学研究假设。其结果是对种族主义和性别歧视意识形态进行了丰富的多学科批判,因为它们在研究方法和结果解释中表达出来。在第一章中,生物学家Ruth Hubbard展示了在关于“种族”差异的基因讨论中引发的人为分类。她指出,强调遗传差异和区分种类都是值得怀疑的。人类基因是相对同质的,大多数基因可以在所有种族和地理位置中找到。没有普遍商定的种族类别定义;种族定义要求将特定的身体特征(如肤色、发质)挑出来,认为它们具有解释意义,即使没有理由认为它们与智力或行为等其他特征相关。同样,尽管X和Y染色体的数量区分了女性和男性,但尽管缺乏证据将这些染色体与问题中的行为差异联系起来,但这些生物学差异通常被赋予了解释力。卡普兰和罗杰斯在书中详细介绍了种族差异理论和研究的历史,从戈比诺的雅利安人至上理论,到颅骨学和上臂骨长比,这些理论和研究都强调了白人男性在种族和性别上的优越性。卡普兰和罗杰斯清楚地表明,种族主义和性别歧视的意识形态先于种族和性别差异的研究,并为这些研究提供了信息,然后这些研究被用来支持这些意识形态。他们列举了许多著名科学家的故事,当这些特定测量的结果违背了他们关于种族和性别优势的假设时,他们放弃了基于种族和男性之间的遗传形态学差异的理论。对于缺乏遗传学背景的人来说,伍德沃德关于人口遗传学的那一章很难读。然而,伍德沃德清楚地表明,极端还原论需要坚持社会生物学,或遗传决定论的立场,使用不同层次的分析比其他章节的书。提供了一个遗传术语词汇表,这对解读本章非常有帮助,也是评估遗传研究成果报告的有用资源。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging racism and sexism : alternatives to genetic explanations
In 1989, J.P. Rushton presented a paper at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science outlining his now notorious genetics-based theory of brain sizes and alleged racial differences in intelligence. While defenders of Rushton's work have focussed on his right to express any ideas rather than on the content of the work itself, critics have focussed on the scientific flaws in Rushton's work as well as its racist implications. Critical responses to Rushton's ideas have been varied, from condemnation within the academy to student protesters sporting measuring-tape headbands. The Genes and Gender Collective responded to Rushton's work by organizing a symposium at the following AAAS annual meeting, presenting analyses of human behaviour which do not revert to genetic determinism. Challenging Racism and Sexism: Alternatives to Genetic Explanations is a collection of papers that challenge genetic determinist thinking and expose the racism and sexism that often underlie genetic determinism as a theory of human behaviour. Essays in this volume reveal the flawed methodologies and racist and sexist assumptions of genetic determinist theories in various disciplines. Some of the essays analyze the historical events which accompany the resurgence of biological and genetic determinism; others describe the practical impact genetic determinist theories have on women and men in various ethnic communities. The book is divided into three parts. In the first part, assumptions underlying scientific research in biological, physiological and psychological research and clinical psychology practice are discussed. The result is a rich multidisciplinary critique of racist and sexist ideologies as they are expressed in research methodologies and in the interpretation of results. In the first chapter, biologist Ruth Hubbard shows the artificial categories evoked in the genetic discussions of "racial" differences. She points out that both the emphasis on genetic differences and the categories for differentiation are suspect. Human genes are relatively homogeneous, and most genes can be found among all ethnic groups and geographical locations. No universally agreed upon definitions exist for racial categories; racial definitions require the singling out of specific bodily characteristics (e.g., skin colour, hair texture) as having explanatory significance even though there is no reason to think that they are relevant to other characteristics like intelligence or behaviour. Likewise, although the numbers of X and Y chromosomes distinguish females and males, these biological differences are often given explanatory power despite the lack of evidence linking these chromosomes to the behavioural differences in question. The arbitrary nature of the body characteristics used to claim racial and sexual superiority of white males is highlighted in the chapter by Kaplan and Rogers which details the history of theory and research on racial differences, from Gobineau's theories of Aryan supremacy, to craniology and lower:upper arm bone-length ratios. Kaplan and Rogers demonstrate clearly that racist and sexist ideologies precede and inform research on racial and sex differences, which is then used to support these ideologies. They give numerous accounts of eminent scientists who discarded their theories of genetically-based morphological differences between ethnic groups and between women and men when the results of these particular measurements violated their presumptions with respect to ethnic and sexual superiority. Woodward's chapter on population genetics is a difficult one for someone who lacks a background in genetics. However, Woodward clearly shows the extreme reductionism required to adhere to a sociobiological, or genetic determinist stance, using a different level of analysis than the other chapters of the book. A glossary of genetic terms is provided which was very helpful for deciphering the chapter and also a helpful resource for evaluating reports of genetic research findings. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信