{"title":"从外部寻求介入:介入者必须证明其参与诉讼的资格吗?","authors":"J. Karastelev","doi":"10.2307/1373177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The law's traditional conception of a \"case\" has evolved from a discrete dispute between two adverse parties to a multiparty structure covering a range of related and often conflicting interests.' The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide several avenues for expanding the involved participants in a case beyond a single plaintiff and single defendant to include other affected or interested parties.2 Intervention under Rule 24 is the vehicle nonparties use to protect their interests from potential impairment by a court's adjudication of a dispute between the original parties. By allowing nonparties to intervene, Rule 24 lets them represent their interests and arguably improves the court's decisionmaking by allowing the presentation of different viewpoints and evidence.3 Courts may also benefit from granting mo-","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"136 1","pages":"455-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the outside Seeking In: Must Intervenors Demonstrate Standing to Join a Lawsuit?\",\"authors\":\"J. Karastelev\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1373177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The law's traditional conception of a \\\"case\\\" has evolved from a discrete dispute between two adverse parties to a multiparty structure covering a range of related and often conflicting interests.' The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide several avenues for expanding the involved participants in a case beyond a single plaintiff and single defendant to include other affected or interested parties.2 Intervention under Rule 24 is the vehicle nonparties use to protect their interests from potential impairment by a court's adjudication of a dispute between the original parties. By allowing nonparties to intervene, Rule 24 lets them represent their interests and arguably improves the court's decisionmaking by allowing the presentation of different viewpoints and evidence.3 Courts may also benefit from granting mo-\",\"PeriodicalId\":47625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"455-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1373177\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1373177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the outside Seeking In: Must Intervenors Demonstrate Standing to Join a Lawsuit?
The law's traditional conception of a "case" has evolved from a discrete dispute between two adverse parties to a multiparty structure covering a range of related and often conflicting interests.' The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide several avenues for expanding the involved participants in a case beyond a single plaintiff and single defendant to include other affected or interested parties.2 Intervention under Rule 24 is the vehicle nonparties use to protect their interests from potential impairment by a court's adjudication of a dispute between the original parties. By allowing nonparties to intervene, Rule 24 lets them represent their interests and arguably improves the court's decisionmaking by allowing the presentation of different viewpoints and evidence.3 Courts may also benefit from granting mo-
期刊介绍:
The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.