被禁止的现实与破碎的人:在跨国空间中重塑生活

Q3 Social Sciences

Issues in Legal Scholarship Pub Date : 2011-10-24 DOI:10.2202/1539-8323.1128

S. Coutin

{"title":"被禁止的现实与破碎的人:在跨国空间中重塑生活","authors":"S. Coutin","doi":"10.2202/1539-8323.1128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review explores the ways that Bosniaks The Citizen and the Alien and Shachars The Birthright Lottery usefully expose gaps between permissible and prohibited realities and persons. Drawing on ethnographic research regarding immigration from Central America to the United States, the review also highlights the importance of analyzing the transnational, states property-like claims on their migrant citizens, and the transformative dimensions of jus soli. This ethnographic material suggests that discrepancies between inclusive social connections and confining legal statuses fracture persons, requiring them to exist in multiple yet incompatible worlds. The review concludes that notions of citizenship and alienage must take such fracturing into account.","PeriodicalId":34921,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1539-8323.1128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prohibited Realities and Fractured Persons: Remaking Lives in Transnational Spaces\",\"authors\":\"S. Coutin\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1539-8323.1128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review explores the ways that Bosniaks The Citizen and the Alien and Shachars The Birthright Lottery usefully expose gaps between permissible and prohibited realities and persons. Drawing on ethnographic research regarding immigration from Central America to the United States, the review also highlights the importance of analyzing the transnational, states property-like claims on their migrant citizens, and the transformative dimensions of jus soli. This ethnographic material suggests that discrepancies between inclusive social connections and confining legal statuses fracture persons, requiring them to exist in multiple yet incompatible worlds. The review concludes that notions of citizenship and alienage must take such fracturing into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Legal Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1539-8323.1128\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Legal Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论探讨了波什尼亚克的《公民与外国人》和沙查尔的《出生权彩票》如何有效地揭示了允许与禁止的现实和个人之间的差距。通过对中美洲移民到美国的民族志研究，本综述还强调了分析跨国国家对其移民公民的类似财产的主张的重要性，以及个人法的变革维度。这种民族志材料表明，包容性社会关系和限制性法律地位之间的差异“分裂”了人，要求他们存在于多个但不相容的世界中。审查的结论是，公民身份和异化的概念必须考虑到这种分裂。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Prohibited Realities and Fractured Persons: Remaking Lives in Transnational Spaces

This review explores the ways that Bosniaks The Citizen and the Alien and Shachars The Birthright Lottery usefully expose gaps between permissible and prohibited realities and persons. Drawing on ethnographic research regarding immigration from Central America to the United States, the review also highlights the importance of analyzing the transnational, states property-like claims on their migrant citizens, and the transformative dimensions of jus soli. This ethnographic material suggests that discrepancies between inclusive social connections and confining legal statuses fracture persons, requiring them to exist in multiple yet incompatible worlds. The review concludes that notions of citizenship and alienage must take such fracturing into account.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Issues in Legal Scholarship Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Issues in Legal Scholarship presents cutting-edge legal and policy research using the format of online peer-reviewed symposia. The journal’s emphasis on interdisciplinary work and legal theory extends to recent symposium topics such as Single-Sex Marriage, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, and Catastrophic Risks. The symposia systematically address emerging issues of great significance, offering ongoing scholarship of interest to a wide range of policy and legal researchers. Online publication makes it possible for other researchers to find the best and latest quickly, as well as to join in further discussion. Each symposium aims to be a living forum with ongoing publications and commentaries.