{"title":"教师、学生、票务:约翰·弗兰克、利昂·希金波坦和《最高法院的一个下午——不是一件小事》","authors":"J. Barrett","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.305899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fall of 1949, John P. Frank was a leading American constitutional law scholar and a new associate professor at Yale Law School. He also was a co-author of the amicus brief that the \"Committee of Law Teachers Against Segregation in Legal Education\" filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner in Sweatt v. Painter, which challenged Texas's Jim Crow system of racially-segregated legal education. When the Sweatt case was set for oral argument in April 1950, Professor Frank took his first-year student, A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., with him to the Supreme Court to witness the event. For Leon Higginbotham (himself an impoverished black law student), this chance to witness Thurgood Marshall's attack on Plessy v. Ferguson in the context of defending a black law student's right to equal protection in legal education became a galvanizing, life-defining event. This paper, which is based on a presentation at Yale Law School's February 2002 conference on the life and legacy of Judge Higginbotham (1928-1998), reconstructs these events of 1949-1950 and describes the enormous impact of John Frank's small effort to give Leon Higginbotham a special opportunity.","PeriodicalId":83556,"journal":{"name":"Yale law & policy review","volume":"20 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher, Student, Ticket: John Frank, Leon Higginbotham and One Afternoon at the Supreme Court - Not a Trifling Thing\",\"authors\":\"J. Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.305899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fall of 1949, John P. Frank was a leading American constitutional law scholar and a new associate professor at Yale Law School. He also was a co-author of the amicus brief that the \\\"Committee of Law Teachers Against Segregation in Legal Education\\\" filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner in Sweatt v. Painter, which challenged Texas's Jim Crow system of racially-segregated legal education. When the Sweatt case was set for oral argument in April 1950, Professor Frank took his first-year student, A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., with him to the Supreme Court to witness the event. For Leon Higginbotham (himself an impoverished black law student), this chance to witness Thurgood Marshall's attack on Plessy v. Ferguson in the context of defending a black law student's right to equal protection in legal education became a galvanizing, life-defining event. This paper, which is based on a presentation at Yale Law School's February 2002 conference on the life and legacy of Judge Higginbotham (1928-1998), reconstructs these events of 1949-1950 and describes the enormous impact of John Frank's small effort to give Leon Higginbotham a special opportunity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale law & policy review\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale law & policy review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.305899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale law & policy review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.305899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1949年秋天,约翰·p·弗兰克(John P. Frank)是美国著名的宪法学者,也是耶鲁大学法学院(Yale law School)新任副教授。他也是“反对法律教育中种族隔离的法律教师委员会”向最高法院提交的法庭之友陈述书的共同作者,该陈述书是代表斯威特诉佩特案的请愿人提交的,该案件挑战了德克萨斯州种族隔离法律教育的吉姆·克劳制度。1950年4月,当斯威特案开始口头辩论时,弗兰克教授带着他的一年级学生小a·利昂·希金波坦(A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr.)一起去最高法院见证这一事件。对里昂·希金波坦(Leon Higginbotham)(他自己也是一名贫困的黑人法学院学生)来说,在捍卫黑人法学院学生在法律教育中获得平等保护的权利的背景下,见证瑟古德·马歇尔(Thurgood Marshall)对普莱西诉弗格森案(Plessy v. Ferguson)的攻击,这一机会成为了一件鼓舞人心的、决定一生的事件。这篇论文基于2002年2月耶鲁法学院关于希金波坦法官(1928-1998)的生平和遗产会议上的一份报告,重建了1949-1950年的这些事件,并描述了约翰·弗兰克为给利奥·希金波坦一个特殊机会所做的小小的努力所产生的巨大影响。
Teacher, Student, Ticket: John Frank, Leon Higginbotham and One Afternoon at the Supreme Court - Not a Trifling Thing
In the fall of 1949, John P. Frank was a leading American constitutional law scholar and a new associate professor at Yale Law School. He also was a co-author of the amicus brief that the "Committee of Law Teachers Against Segregation in Legal Education" filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner in Sweatt v. Painter, which challenged Texas's Jim Crow system of racially-segregated legal education. When the Sweatt case was set for oral argument in April 1950, Professor Frank took his first-year student, A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., with him to the Supreme Court to witness the event. For Leon Higginbotham (himself an impoverished black law student), this chance to witness Thurgood Marshall's attack on Plessy v. Ferguson in the context of defending a black law student's right to equal protection in legal education became a galvanizing, life-defining event. This paper, which is based on a presentation at Yale Law School's February 2002 conference on the life and legacy of Judge Higginbotham (1928-1998), reconstructs these events of 1949-1950 and describes the enormous impact of John Frank's small effort to give Leon Higginbotham a special opportunity.