{"title":"关于机器的一件事:e<s:2> de Queirós的技术模糊地带","authors":"A. Ilievska","doi":"10.21471/jls.v4i2.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By reconstructing the acts and voices of technological artifacts in A cidade e as serras (1901), this paper outlines what I call Eca de Queiros’s technological “twilight zone,” where machines are granted literary citizenship, and human interlocutors are forced to reevaluate who and what counts as humanity and conversation. I argue that the unresponsiveness of technological artifacts to the human voice in A cidade e as serras reveals a process of destabilization of power hierarchies and vocal anthropocentrism. Eca neither demonizes nor glorifies machines; rather he elaborates ways in which productive coexistence and communication can remain a prime objective. In A cidade e as serras, Eca parses out anxieties about technology and modernity in subtle and balanced ways that can shed new light on enduring questions about humanmachine interactions in our era of technological dependence.","PeriodicalId":52257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"243-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Thing About Machines: Eça de Queirós's Technological Twilight Zone\",\"authors\":\"A. Ilievska\",\"doi\":\"10.21471/jls.v4i2.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By reconstructing the acts and voices of technological artifacts in A cidade e as serras (1901), this paper outlines what I call Eca de Queiros’s technological “twilight zone,” where machines are granted literary citizenship, and human interlocutors are forced to reevaluate who and what counts as humanity and conversation. I argue that the unresponsiveness of technological artifacts to the human voice in A cidade e as serras reveals a process of destabilization of power hierarchies and vocal anthropocentrism. Eca neither demonizes nor glorifies machines; rather he elaborates ways in which productive coexistence and communication can remain a prime objective. In A cidade e as serras, Eca parses out anxieties about technology and modernity in subtle and balanced ways that can shed new light on enduring questions about humanmachine interactions in our era of technological dependence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lusophone Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"243-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lusophone Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21471/jls.v4i2.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21471/jls.v4i2.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通过重构《作为奴隶的cidade e as serras》(1901)中技术人工制品的行为和声音,本文概述了我称之为Eca de Queiros的技术“模糊地带”,在这里,机器被授予文学公民身份,而人类对话者被迫重新评估谁和什么才是人性和对话。我认为,技术制品对人类声音的不响应,揭示了权力等级和声音人类中心主义的不稳定过程。Eca既不妖魔化机器,也不美化机器;相反,他详细阐述了如何使富有成效的共存和交流成为主要目标。在《作为塞拉斯的cidade e as serras》一书中,埃卡以微妙而平衡的方式分析了人们对技术和现代性的焦虑,为我们这个依赖技术的时代有关人机交互的持久问题提供了新的视角。
A Thing About Machines: Eça de Queirós's Technological Twilight Zone
By reconstructing the acts and voices of technological artifacts in A cidade e as serras (1901), this paper outlines what I call Eca de Queiros’s technological “twilight zone,” where machines are granted literary citizenship, and human interlocutors are forced to reevaluate who and what counts as humanity and conversation. I argue that the unresponsiveness of technological artifacts to the human voice in A cidade e as serras reveals a process of destabilization of power hierarchies and vocal anthropocentrism. Eca neither demonizes nor glorifies machines; rather he elaborates ways in which productive coexistence and communication can remain a prime objective. In A cidade e as serras, Eca parses out anxieties about technology and modernity in subtle and balanced ways that can shed new light on enduring questions about humanmachine interactions in our era of technological dependence.