缬更昔洛韦预防和治疗实体器官移植中巨细胞病毒感染

IF 0.1 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
E. Ticehurst, J. Trofe‐Clark, E. Blumberg, R. Bloom
{"title":"缬更昔洛韦预防和治疗实体器官移植中巨细胞病毒感染","authors":"E. Ticehurst, J. Trofe‐Clark, E. Blumberg, R. Bloom","doi":"10.2147/TRRM.S5979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be a problematic virus for solid organ transplant recipients affecting both morbidity and mortality. Valganciclovir (VGC) is a commonly utilized antiviral agent for the prevention of this virus post-transplantation and recently it has been evaluated for the treatment of CMV. It is a pro-drug of ganciclovir (GCV) and has increased bioavailability compared to GCV. It is unclear whether VGC is superior to intravenous or oral GCV in terms of efficacy and safety in the prevention of CMV particularly in the liver transplant population as there have been studies reporting inferiority while other studies have not. Despite this, VGC has been reported to be the most commonly utilized agent for CMV prophylaxis in the liver transplant population in the United States and Canada. This article reviews CMV and VGC in the context of solid organ transplant, describes and assesses selected studies that have been conducted using this agent in this patient population, and summarizes VGC's advantages and disadvantages. Additional studies are needed to further define VGC's role in the treatment of CMV in the solid organ transplantation population as there are an insufficient number of studies pertaining to CMV treatment and no studies have been performed to assess its role in the treatment of life-threatening CMV disease. VGC is non-inferior to GCV for CMV prevention in the solid organ transplant population with the exception of liver transplant recipients.","PeriodicalId":41597,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TRRM.S5979","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valganciclovir for the prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation\",\"authors\":\"E. Ticehurst, J. Trofe‐Clark, E. Blumberg, R. Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TRRM.S5979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be a problematic virus for solid organ transplant recipients affecting both morbidity and mortality. Valganciclovir (VGC) is a commonly utilized antiviral agent for the prevention of this virus post-transplantation and recently it has been evaluated for the treatment of CMV. It is a pro-drug of ganciclovir (GCV) and has increased bioavailability compared to GCV. It is unclear whether VGC is superior to intravenous or oral GCV in terms of efficacy and safety in the prevention of CMV particularly in the liver transplant population as there have been studies reporting inferiority while other studies have not. Despite this, VGC has been reported to be the most commonly utilized agent for CMV prophylaxis in the liver transplant population in the United States and Canada. This article reviews CMV and VGC in the context of solid organ transplant, describes and assesses selected studies that have been conducted using this agent in this patient population, and summarizes VGC's advantages and disadvantages. Additional studies are needed to further define VGC's role in the treatment of CMV in the solid organ transplantation population as there are an insufficient number of studies pertaining to CMV treatment and no studies have been performed to assess its role in the treatment of life-threatening CMV disease. VGC is non-inferior to GCV for CMV prevention in the solid organ transplant population with the exception of liver transplant recipients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Research and Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"29-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TRRM.S5979\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Research and Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TRRM.S5979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TRRM.S5979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

巨细胞病毒(CMV)对实体器官移植受者来说是一个有问题的病毒,影响发病率和死亡率。缬更昔洛韦(VGC)是一种常用的抗病毒药物,用于预防移植后的巨细胞病毒,最近已被评估用于治疗巨细胞病毒。它是更昔洛韦(GCV)的前药,与更昔洛韦相比具有更高的生物利用度。目前尚不清楚VGC在预防巨细胞病毒的有效性和安全性方面是否优于静脉注射或口服GCV,特别是在肝移植人群中,因为有研究报告了其劣势,而其他研究则没有。尽管如此,据报道,VGC是美国和加拿大肝移植人群中预防巨细胞病毒最常用的药物。本文综述了CMV和VGC在实体器官移植中的应用,描述和评估了在该患者群体中使用该药物进行的选定研究,并总结了VGC的优点和缺点。由于有关巨细胞病毒治疗的研究数量不足,并且没有研究评估其在治疗危及生命的巨细胞病毒疾病中的作用,因此需要进一步的研究来进一步确定VGC在治疗巨细胞病毒中的作用。在实体器官移植人群(肝移植受者除外)中,VGC预防巨细胞病毒的效果不逊于GCV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valganciclovir for the prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be a problematic virus for solid organ transplant recipients affecting both morbidity and mortality. Valganciclovir (VGC) is a commonly utilized antiviral agent for the prevention of this virus post-transplantation and recently it has been evaluated for the treatment of CMV. It is a pro-drug of ganciclovir (GCV) and has increased bioavailability compared to GCV. It is unclear whether VGC is superior to intravenous or oral GCV in terms of efficacy and safety in the prevention of CMV particularly in the liver transplant population as there have been studies reporting inferiority while other studies have not. Despite this, VGC has been reported to be the most commonly utilized agent for CMV prophylaxis in the liver transplant population in the United States and Canada. This article reviews CMV and VGC in the context of solid organ transplant, describes and assesses selected studies that have been conducted using this agent in this patient population, and summarizes VGC's advantages and disadvantages. Additional studies are needed to further define VGC's role in the treatment of CMV in the solid organ transplantation population as there are an insufficient number of studies pertaining to CMV treatment and no studies have been performed to assess its role in the treatment of life-threatening CMV disease. VGC is non-inferior to GCV for CMV prevention in the solid organ transplant population with the exception of liver transplant recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信