如何研究制宪:赫施尔、埃尔斯特和第七局问题

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Tom Ginsburg
{"title":"如何研究制宪:赫施尔、埃尔斯特和第七局问题","authors":"Tom Ginsburg","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2997552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is very difficult to comment on a book with which one fundamentally agrees. Ran Hirschl's magnificent Comparative Matters is not only a deep work of intellectual history, but it also makes a powerful methodological argument. Hirschl calls for integrating the study of comparative constitutional law into a broader field of comparative constitutional studies, in which rigorous but pluralistic social sciences are deployed to help us understand problems. Who could possibly object? Certainly not I.Hirschl's clarion call is to expand our frameworks outward in three ways. First, he asks us to expand our focus geographically, away from the established democracies of Europe and North America; this is something that the field has belatedly begun to do in the last few years with superb results.1 Second, Hirschl wants the field to expand methodologically, away from narrow lawyerly doctrinalism toward truly interdisciplinary inquiry, and he points out the many contributions of social scientists to the endeavor.2 Third, he asks us to expand our temporal framework.3 Hirschl's own methodology of returning to earlier exemplars of comparison, ancient and modern, is itself an example here. Hirschl also points out that, within any particular system, we ought not be limited in our focus on the moment courts decide cases but rather should take a broader frame. Instead we ought to look at moments of constitutionalization, constitution-making and constitutional politics beyond the judiciary. This is another way of expanding the temporal frame, away from the moment of judicial decision.Let's begin with this last point. With apologies for the American parochialism, I have characterized the narrow focus on court decisions the \"Seventh Inning Problem\" in Comparative Constitutional Law.4 The analogy is to a baseball fan who pays overly felicitous attention to a late inning. Imagine yourself as a fan going to watch the Toronto Blue Jays with a good friend; let's call him Shai. You arrive very late, at the top of the seventh inning. You see which team is batting, and so can deduce who is the home team, since the home team in baseball always bats in the bottom half of the inning. You look at the scoreboard and see the score, which allows you to ascertain who is winning and losing. But you do not know how the score came to be that way or why.You proceed to watch the seventh inning. As baseball innings go, the seventh is fairly important-not just in the top ten but somewhat higher. Sometimes a team will score a decisive comeback run; other times a team will shut out the other side and close in on victory. (Indeed, this past October, the aforementioned Toronto Blue Jays played one of the most remarkable and important seventh innings in baseball history, winning the National League Championship Series with a three-run comeback.5) It is also the case that the seventh inning has some aesthetic or theatrical advantages over other innings. The inning is always accompanied by a rousing ritual of community, in which the whole stadium joins in the classic song \"Take me out to the ballgame.\" You find this experience stirring and entertaining, as a rare opportunity to join with masses of others in a collective activity; you might also note to yourself that the overly formal civic hymn \"God Bless America\" is not sung in Canada.Imagine that you as a fan watch the inning as it plays out with great excitement. One team scores some runs, perhaps taking the lead from the other. The fans cheer, the tension builds, perhaps the inning ends with a dramatic play in the field. Then . . . you leave. You walk out of the stadium. Maybe you hear the final score of the game on your car radio on the drive home. Maybe you don't. But either way, you do not observe the outcome first hand.The absurdity of this example is not too far from where we started as a discipline in recent decades. Focusing too much on court cases in the constitutional \"game\" has precisely the same structure as the baseball fan who watches only one late inning. …","PeriodicalId":47323,"journal":{"name":"Boston University Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How To Study Constitution-Making: Hirschl, Elster, And The Seventh Inning Problem\",\"authors\":\"Tom Ginsburg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2997552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is very difficult to comment on a book with which one fundamentally agrees. Ran Hirschl's magnificent Comparative Matters is not only a deep work of intellectual history, but it also makes a powerful methodological argument. Hirschl calls for integrating the study of comparative constitutional law into a broader field of comparative constitutional studies, in which rigorous but pluralistic social sciences are deployed to help us understand problems. Who could possibly object? Certainly not I.Hirschl's clarion call is to expand our frameworks outward in three ways. First, he asks us to expand our focus geographically, away from the established democracies of Europe and North America; this is something that the field has belatedly begun to do in the last few years with superb results.1 Second, Hirschl wants the field to expand methodologically, away from narrow lawyerly doctrinalism toward truly interdisciplinary inquiry, and he points out the many contributions of social scientists to the endeavor.2 Third, he asks us to expand our temporal framework.3 Hirschl's own methodology of returning to earlier exemplars of comparison, ancient and modern, is itself an example here. Hirschl also points out that, within any particular system, we ought not be limited in our focus on the moment courts decide cases but rather should take a broader frame. Instead we ought to look at moments of constitutionalization, constitution-making and constitutional politics beyond the judiciary. This is another way of expanding the temporal frame, away from the moment of judicial decision.Let's begin with this last point. With apologies for the American parochialism, I have characterized the narrow focus on court decisions the \\\"Seventh Inning Problem\\\" in Comparative Constitutional Law.4 The analogy is to a baseball fan who pays overly felicitous attention to a late inning. Imagine yourself as a fan going to watch the Toronto Blue Jays with a good friend; let's call him Shai. You arrive very late, at the top of the seventh inning. You see which team is batting, and so can deduce who is the home team, since the home team in baseball always bats in the bottom half of the inning. You look at the scoreboard and see the score, which allows you to ascertain who is winning and losing. But you do not know how the score came to be that way or why.You proceed to watch the seventh inning. As baseball innings go, the seventh is fairly important-not just in the top ten but somewhat higher. Sometimes a team will score a decisive comeback run; other times a team will shut out the other side and close in on victory. (Indeed, this past October, the aforementioned Toronto Blue Jays played one of the most remarkable and important seventh innings in baseball history, winning the National League Championship Series with a three-run comeback.5) It is also the case that the seventh inning has some aesthetic or theatrical advantages over other innings. The inning is always accompanied by a rousing ritual of community, in which the whole stadium joins in the classic song \\\"Take me out to the ballgame.\\\" You find this experience stirring and entertaining, as a rare opportunity to join with masses of others in a collective activity; you might also note to yourself that the overly formal civic hymn \\\"God Bless America\\\" is not sung in Canada.Imagine that you as a fan watch the inning as it plays out with great excitement. One team scores some runs, perhaps taking the lead from the other. The fans cheer, the tension builds, perhaps the inning ends with a dramatic play in the field. Then . . . you leave. You walk out of the stadium. Maybe you hear the final score of the game on your car radio on the drive home. Maybe you don't. But either way, you do not observe the outcome first hand.The absurdity of this example is not too far from where we started as a discipline in recent decades. Focusing too much on court cases in the constitutional \\\"game\\\" has precisely the same structure as the baseball fan who watches only one late inning. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":47323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boston University Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boston University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2997552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boston University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2997552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

要评论一本自己基本同意的书是非常困难的。兰·赫施尔的《比较问题》不仅是一部深刻的思想史著作,而且还提出了强有力的方法论论点。Hirschl呼吁将比较宪法的研究整合到一个更广泛的比较宪法研究领域中,在这个领域中,严谨而多元的社会科学被用来帮助我们理解问题。谁会反对呢?当然不是我。hirschl的口号是通过三种方式向外扩展我们的框架。首先,他要求我们在地理上扩大我们的关注点,远离欧洲和北美的老牌民主国家;这是该领域在过去几年中姗姗来迟地开始做的事情,并取得了极好的结果第二,Hirschl希望这个领域在方法论上得到扩展,从狭隘的律师教条主义转向真正的跨学科研究,他指出了社会科学家对这一努力的许多贡献第三,他要求我们扩展我们的时间框架Hirschl自己回归到早期比较范例的方法,无论是古代的还是现代的,本身就是一个例子。Hirschl还指出,在任何特定的制度中,我们不应该局限于关注法院判决案件的那一刻,而应该采取更广泛的框架。相反,我们应该关注司法之外的宪法化、制宪和宪政的时刻。这是另一种扩展时间框架的方式,远离司法决定的时刻。让我们从最后一点开始。带着对美国狭隘主义的歉意,我把对法院判决的狭隘关注描述为《比较宪法》中的“第七局问题”。这个类比就像一个棒球球迷过分关注最后一局。想象一下,你是一个球迷,要和一个好朋友去看多伦多蓝鸟队的比赛;我们就叫他Shai吧。你很晚才到,在第七局的顶端。你可以看到哪个队在击球,因此可以推断出谁是主队,因为在棒球比赛中,主队总是在下半局击球。你看记分牌,看比分,这可以让你确定谁赢谁输。但你不知道比分是怎么变成那样的,也不知道为什么会这样。你继续看第七局。在棒球比赛中,第七局是相当重要的——不仅排在前十,而且比前十还要高。有时一支球队会取得决定性的反攻;其他时候,一支球队会压制对方,接近胜利。(事实上,在刚刚过去的10月,上文提到的多伦多蓝鸟队打出了棒球历史上最引人注目和最重要的第七局之一,以三分的反攻赢得了全国联赛冠军系列赛。)同样,第七局比其他局有一些美学或戏剧上的优势。每局总是伴随着激动人心的社区仪式,整个体育场都伴随着经典歌曲“带我出去看球赛”。你会发现这是一次难得的与他人一起参加集体活动的机会,令人兴奋和有趣;你可能还会注意到,过于正式的公民赞美诗“上帝保佑美国”在加拿大是不会唱的。想象一下,作为一个球迷,你带着激动的心情观看比赛。一队得了一些分,可能从另一队那里取得了领先。球迷们欢呼雀跃,气氛紧张起来,也许一局结束时球场上出现了戏剧性的一幕。然后……你离开。你走出体育馆。也许你会在开车回家的路上从汽车收音机里听到比赛的最终比分。也许你不知道。但无论哪种方式,你都无法亲眼看到结果。这个例子的荒谬之处与我们近几十年来作为一门学科起步的地方相差不远。过分关注宪法“游戏”中的法庭案件,与只看最后一局的棒球球迷的结构完全相同。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How To Study Constitution-Making: Hirschl, Elster, And The Seventh Inning Problem
It is very difficult to comment on a book with which one fundamentally agrees. Ran Hirschl's magnificent Comparative Matters is not only a deep work of intellectual history, but it also makes a powerful methodological argument. Hirschl calls for integrating the study of comparative constitutional law into a broader field of comparative constitutional studies, in which rigorous but pluralistic social sciences are deployed to help us understand problems. Who could possibly object? Certainly not I.Hirschl's clarion call is to expand our frameworks outward in three ways. First, he asks us to expand our focus geographically, away from the established democracies of Europe and North America; this is something that the field has belatedly begun to do in the last few years with superb results.1 Second, Hirschl wants the field to expand methodologically, away from narrow lawyerly doctrinalism toward truly interdisciplinary inquiry, and he points out the many contributions of social scientists to the endeavor.2 Third, he asks us to expand our temporal framework.3 Hirschl's own methodology of returning to earlier exemplars of comparison, ancient and modern, is itself an example here. Hirschl also points out that, within any particular system, we ought not be limited in our focus on the moment courts decide cases but rather should take a broader frame. Instead we ought to look at moments of constitutionalization, constitution-making and constitutional politics beyond the judiciary. This is another way of expanding the temporal frame, away from the moment of judicial decision.Let's begin with this last point. With apologies for the American parochialism, I have characterized the narrow focus on court decisions the "Seventh Inning Problem" in Comparative Constitutional Law.4 The analogy is to a baseball fan who pays overly felicitous attention to a late inning. Imagine yourself as a fan going to watch the Toronto Blue Jays with a good friend; let's call him Shai. You arrive very late, at the top of the seventh inning. You see which team is batting, and so can deduce who is the home team, since the home team in baseball always bats in the bottom half of the inning. You look at the scoreboard and see the score, which allows you to ascertain who is winning and losing. But you do not know how the score came to be that way or why.You proceed to watch the seventh inning. As baseball innings go, the seventh is fairly important-not just in the top ten but somewhat higher. Sometimes a team will score a decisive comeback run; other times a team will shut out the other side and close in on victory. (Indeed, this past October, the aforementioned Toronto Blue Jays played one of the most remarkable and important seventh innings in baseball history, winning the National League Championship Series with a three-run comeback.5) It is also the case that the seventh inning has some aesthetic or theatrical advantages over other innings. The inning is always accompanied by a rousing ritual of community, in which the whole stadium joins in the classic song "Take me out to the ballgame." You find this experience stirring and entertaining, as a rare opportunity to join with masses of others in a collective activity; you might also note to yourself that the overly formal civic hymn "God Bless America" is not sung in Canada.Imagine that you as a fan watch the inning as it plays out with great excitement. One team scores some runs, perhaps taking the lead from the other. The fans cheer, the tension builds, perhaps the inning ends with a dramatic play in the field. Then . . . you leave. You walk out of the stadium. Maybe you hear the final score of the game on your car radio on the drive home. Maybe you don't. But either way, you do not observe the outcome first hand.The absurdity of this example is not too far from where we started as a discipline in recent decades. Focusing too much on court cases in the constitutional "game" has precisely the same structure as the baseball fan who watches only one late inning. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Boston University Law Review provides analysis and commentary on all areas of the law. Published six times a year, the Law Review contains articles contributed by law professors and practicing attorneys from all over the world, along with notes written by student members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信