最舒适的水平,不舒服的水平,和刺激类型的动态范围

E. Shin, Soojin Cho
{"title":"最舒适的水平,不舒服的水平,和刺激类型的动态范围","authors":"E. Shin, Soojin Cho","doi":"10.21848/audiol.2014.10.2.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to establish the estimates of MCL (Most Comfortable Level), UCL (UnComfortable Level), and DR (Dynamic Range) using different stimuli. There are several types of stimulus; 1) pure tone of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 2) narrow band noise of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 3) monosyllabic words, 4) bisyllabic words, 5) sentence, and 6) speech noise. 40 ears (10 males and 10 females) with normal hearing and without sound tolerance problems were calculated and the average of the participants’ age was 20.30±1.66 years old. Stimulus was presented by TDH39 headphone and 5 dB steps of ascending method above threshold using pure tone average or speech recognition threshold continuing to the uncomfortable loud level. The nine categories of scaling were used from very soft to painfully loud. The results were as follows: 1) MCL and UCL were showed differences significantly(p < .05) with stimulus type, 2) MCL and UCL of using NBN stimuli were higher than pure tone, speech stimulus (monosyllabic words, bisyllabic words, sentence) were the highest UCL, 3) MCL and UCL were recommended recordings by both ears. These results can be useful for considering different stimuli according to subject’s sound sensitivity and different situations.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Most Comfortable Level, Uncomfortable Level, andDynamic Range with Stimulus Type\",\"authors\":\"E. Shin, Soojin Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.21848/audiol.2014.10.2.149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was to establish the estimates of MCL (Most Comfortable Level), UCL (UnComfortable Level), and DR (Dynamic Range) using different stimuli. There are several types of stimulus; 1) pure tone of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 2) narrow band noise of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 3) monosyllabic words, 4) bisyllabic words, 5) sentence, and 6) speech noise. 40 ears (10 males and 10 females) with normal hearing and without sound tolerance problems were calculated and the average of the participants’ age was 20.30±1.66 years old. Stimulus was presented by TDH39 headphone and 5 dB steps of ascending method above threshold using pure tone average or speech recognition threshold continuing to the uncomfortable loud level. The nine categories of scaling were used from very soft to painfully loud. The results were as follows: 1) MCL and UCL were showed differences significantly(p < .05) with stimulus type, 2) MCL and UCL of using NBN stimuli were higher than pure tone, speech stimulus (monosyllabic words, bisyllabic words, sentence) were the highest UCL, 3) MCL and UCL were recommended recordings by both ears. These results can be useful for considering different stimuli according to subject’s sound sensitivity and different situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"149-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21848/audiol.2014.10.2.149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/audiol.2014.10.2.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在建立MCL(最舒适水平)、UCL(不舒适水平)和DR(动态范围)在不同刺激下的估计。刺激有几种类型;1) 0.5、1、2、3、4khz的纯音,2)0.5、1、2、3、4khz的窄带噪声,3)单音节词,4)双音节词,5)句子,6)语音噪声。计算听力正常、无声音耐受问题的40只耳(男10只,女10只),平均年龄为20.30±1.66岁。刺激通过TDH39耳机和使用纯音平均或语音识别阈值的5 dB升阶法持续到令人不舒服的声音水平。从非常柔和到令人痛苦的大声,九种尺度被使用。结果表明:1)MCL和UCL在刺激类型上存在显著差异(p < 0.05), 2)使用NBN刺激的MCL和UCL高于纯音刺激,语音刺激(单音节词、双音节词、句子)的UCL最高,3)MCL和UCL为双耳推荐录音。这些结果可用于根据被试的声音敏感性和不同情况考虑不同的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Most Comfortable Level, Uncomfortable Level, andDynamic Range with Stimulus Type
This study was to establish the estimates of MCL (Most Comfortable Level), UCL (UnComfortable Level), and DR (Dynamic Range) using different stimuli. There are several types of stimulus; 1) pure tone of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 2) narrow band noise of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz, 3) monosyllabic words, 4) bisyllabic words, 5) sentence, and 6) speech noise. 40 ears (10 males and 10 females) with normal hearing and without sound tolerance problems were calculated and the average of the participants’ age was 20.30±1.66 years old. Stimulus was presented by TDH39 headphone and 5 dB steps of ascending method above threshold using pure tone average or speech recognition threshold continuing to the uncomfortable loud level. The nine categories of scaling were used from very soft to painfully loud. The results were as follows: 1) MCL and UCL were showed differences significantly(p < .05) with stimulus type, 2) MCL and UCL of using NBN stimuli were higher than pure tone, speech stimulus (monosyllabic words, bisyllabic words, sentence) were the highest UCL, 3) MCL and UCL were recommended recordings by both ears. These results can be useful for considering different stimuli according to subject’s sound sensitivity and different situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信