第三个标准:作为防止党派不公正划分选区的程序保障的紧凑性

Yale law & policy review Pub Date : 1991-03-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2936284

D. Polsby, R. Popper

{"title":"第三个标准:作为防止党派不公正划分选区的程序保障的紧凑性","authors":"D. Polsby, R. Popper","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2936284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses partisan gerrymandering and proposes a formal remedy. In addition to adhering to criteria which mandate that representational districts be composed of contiguous territories and have equal populations, we suggest that those who define district boundaries must also be required to respect a third criterion, the constraint of compactness.","PeriodicalId":83556,"journal":{"name":"Yale law & policy review","volume":"9 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2936284","citationCount":"171","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Third Criterion: Compactness as a Procedural Safeguard Against Partisan Gerrymandering\",\"authors\":\"D. Polsby, R. Popper\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2936284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses partisan gerrymandering and proposes a formal remedy. In addition to adhering to criteria which mandate that representational districts be composed of contiguous territories and have equal populations, we suggest that those who define district boundaries must also be required to respect a third criterion, the constraint of compactness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale law & policy review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2936284\",\"citationCount\":\"171\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale law & policy review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2936284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale law & policy review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2936284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 171

摘要

本文讨论了党派的不公正划分，并提出了正式的补救措施。除了遵守要求代表性地区由相邻领土组成和人口相等的标准外，我们建议那些定义地区边界的人还必须遵守第三个标准，即紧凑性的约束。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Third Criterion: Compactness as a Procedural Safeguard Against Partisan Gerrymandering

This paper addresses partisan gerrymandering and proposes a formal remedy. In addition to adhering to criteria which mandate that representational districts be composed of contiguous territories and have equal populations, we suggest that those who define district boundaries must also be required to respect a third criterion, the constraint of compactness.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Yale law & policy review

自引率

0.00%

发文量