用于精确解剖、凝血和横断的超声装置的体外和体内评价

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Brian D. Bertke, P. Scoggins, Alissa L. Welling, Tamara V. Widenhouse, Chaoyang Chen, S. Kallakuri, J. Cavanaugh, J. Clymer, Joseph F. Amaral
{"title":"用于精确解剖、凝血和横断的超声装置的体外和体内评价","authors":"Brian D. Bertke, P. Scoggins, Alissa L. Welling, Tamara V. Widenhouse, Chaoyang Chen, S. Kallakuri, J. Cavanaugh, J. Clymer, Joseph F. Amaral","doi":"10.2147/OAS.S73851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A new ultrasonic device, Harmonic Focus ® + , has been developed that is smaller and delivers energy more efficiently than its predecessor via the inclusion of Adaptive Tissue Technology. This study was undertaken to compare its dissection capabilities to an advanced bipolar electrosurgery device in benchtop and preclinical evaluations. Methods: In ex vivo testing, Focus + and LigaSure™ Small Jaw were evaluated for physical dimensions, device and tissue temperature after repeated applications to porcine jejunum, and burst pressure of vessel seals, transection time, and tissue sticking in 3–5 mm porcine carotid arteries. In in vivo testing, the devices were tested on intact porcine carotid arteries for thermal damage via collagen denaturation and in muscle incisions near rat sciatic nerve for acute inflammation via hematoxylin and eosin and for impaired axonal transport via β -APP. Results: Focus + was smaller than the Small Jaw in width and height, yet it had a longer active blade and larger jaw aperture. Device temperatures were not different after application, but thermal spread (tissue temperature above 50 ° C) was 78% greater for Small Jaw (9.6 mm) than for Focus + (5.4 mm). Burst pressures of sealed vessels were not significantly different between the devices: 900 ( ± 466) mmHg for Focus + versus 974 ( ± 500) mmHg for Small Jaw. Small Jaw had a shorter individual transection time (5.0 seconds compared to 6.3 seconds for Focus + ), whereas Focus + had 70% less tissue sticking. Thermal damage, neural inflammation, and impaired axonal transport were all significantly lower for Focus + compared to Small Jaw, by 19%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: With the addition of Adaptive Tissue Technology, Harmonic Focus + builds upon the manifold advantages of ultrasonic devices in procedures requiring meticulous dissecting capability. Improvements in energy sensing and controlled delivery produce lower tissue temperatures and less thermal damage, especially critical when working near nerves. Focus + produces vessel seal strengths equivalent to advanced bipolar devices and, although individual device activations are longer, the reduction in tissue sticking is expected to materially lessen operative time in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S73851","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of an ultrasonic device for precise dissection, coagulation, and transection\",\"authors\":\"Brian D. Bertke, P. Scoggins, Alissa L. Welling, Tamara V. Widenhouse, Chaoyang Chen, S. Kallakuri, J. Cavanaugh, J. Clymer, Joseph F. Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAS.S73851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A new ultrasonic device, Harmonic Focus ® + , has been developed that is smaller and delivers energy more efficiently than its predecessor via the inclusion of Adaptive Tissue Technology. This study was undertaken to compare its dissection capabilities to an advanced bipolar electrosurgery device in benchtop and preclinical evaluations. Methods: In ex vivo testing, Focus + and LigaSure™ Small Jaw were evaluated for physical dimensions, device and tissue temperature after repeated applications to porcine jejunum, and burst pressure of vessel seals, transection time, and tissue sticking in 3–5 mm porcine carotid arteries. In in vivo testing, the devices were tested on intact porcine carotid arteries for thermal damage via collagen denaturation and in muscle incisions near rat sciatic nerve for acute inflammation via hematoxylin and eosin and for impaired axonal transport via β -APP. Results: Focus + was smaller than the Small Jaw in width and height, yet it had a longer active blade and larger jaw aperture. Device temperatures were not different after application, but thermal spread (tissue temperature above 50 ° C) was 78% greater for Small Jaw (9.6 mm) than for Focus + (5.4 mm). Burst pressures of sealed vessels were not significantly different between the devices: 900 ( ± 466) mmHg for Focus + versus 974 ( ± 500) mmHg for Small Jaw. Small Jaw had a shorter individual transection time (5.0 seconds compared to 6.3 seconds for Focus + ), whereas Focus + had 70% less tissue sticking. Thermal damage, neural inflammation, and impaired axonal transport were all significantly lower for Focus + compared to Small Jaw, by 19%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: With the addition of Adaptive Tissue Technology, Harmonic Focus + builds upon the manifold advantages of ultrasonic devices in procedures requiring meticulous dissecting capability. Improvements in energy sensing and controlled delivery produce lower tissue temperatures and less thermal damage, especially critical when working near nerves. Focus + produces vessel seal strengths equivalent to advanced bipolar devices and, although individual device activations are longer, the reduction in tissue sticking is expected to materially lessen operative time in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S73851\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S73851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S73851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:一种新的超声波设备,谐波焦点®+,已经开发出更小,更有效地传递能量比其前身通过包含自适应组织技术。本研究的目的是在台式和临床前评估中将其解剖能力与先进的双极电手术设备进行比较。方法:在离体实验中,评估Focus +和LigaSure™Small Jaw在猪空肠重复应用后的物理尺寸、设备和组织温度,以及血管密封破裂压力、横断时间和3-5 mm猪颈动脉组织粘附情况。在体内测试中,通过胶原变性对完整的猪颈动脉进行热损伤测试,通过苏木精和伊红对大鼠坐骨神经附近的肌肉切口进行急性炎症测试,通过β -APP对轴突运输受损进行测试。结果:Focus +在宽度和高度上均小于Small Jaw,但其活动叶片较长,下颌孔径较大。应用后设备温度没有差异,但小颚(9.6 mm)的热扩散(组织温度高于50°C)比Focus + (5.4 mm)大78%。两种设备之间密封血管的破裂压力无显著差异:Focus +为900(±466)mmHg, Small Jaw为974(±500)mmHg。Small Jaw的个体横断时间较短(5.0秒,而Focus +为6.3秒),而Focus +的组织粘连减少了70%。与Small Jaw相比,Focus +的热损伤、神经炎症和轴突运输损伤均显著降低,分别降低19%、57%和50%。结论:随着自适应组织技术的加入,谐波聚焦+在需要细致解剖能力的手术中发挥了超声设备的多方面优势。能量传感和控制输送的改进可以降低组织温度,减少热损伤,这在神经附近工作时尤为重要。Focus +产生的血管密封强度相当于先进的双极装置,尽管单个装置的激活时间更长,但减少组织粘连有望在临床实践中大大减少手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of an ultrasonic device for precise dissection, coagulation, and transection
Background: A new ultrasonic device, Harmonic Focus ® + , has been developed that is smaller and delivers energy more efficiently than its predecessor via the inclusion of Adaptive Tissue Technology. This study was undertaken to compare its dissection capabilities to an advanced bipolar electrosurgery device in benchtop and preclinical evaluations. Methods: In ex vivo testing, Focus + and LigaSure™ Small Jaw were evaluated for physical dimensions, device and tissue temperature after repeated applications to porcine jejunum, and burst pressure of vessel seals, transection time, and tissue sticking in 3–5 mm porcine carotid arteries. In in vivo testing, the devices were tested on intact porcine carotid arteries for thermal damage via collagen denaturation and in muscle incisions near rat sciatic nerve for acute inflammation via hematoxylin and eosin and for impaired axonal transport via β -APP. Results: Focus + was smaller than the Small Jaw in width and height, yet it had a longer active blade and larger jaw aperture. Device temperatures were not different after application, but thermal spread (tissue temperature above 50 ° C) was 78% greater for Small Jaw (9.6 mm) than for Focus + (5.4 mm). Burst pressures of sealed vessels were not significantly different between the devices: 900 ( ± 466) mmHg for Focus + versus 974 ( ± 500) mmHg for Small Jaw. Small Jaw had a shorter individual transection time (5.0 seconds compared to 6.3 seconds for Focus + ), whereas Focus + had 70% less tissue sticking. Thermal damage, neural inflammation, and impaired axonal transport were all significantly lower for Focus + compared to Small Jaw, by 19%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: With the addition of Adaptive Tissue Technology, Harmonic Focus + builds upon the manifold advantages of ultrasonic devices in procedures requiring meticulous dissecting capability. Improvements in energy sensing and controlled delivery produce lower tissue temperatures and less thermal damage, especially critical when working near nerves. Focus + produces vessel seal strengths equivalent to advanced bipolar devices and, although individual device activations are longer, the reduction in tissue sticking is expected to materially lessen operative time in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信