腹疝:初次修补、合成补片修补和脱细胞异种移植修复的回顾性成本分析

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
G. Denoto, N. Reaven, S. Funk
{"title":"腹疝:初次修补、合成补片修补和脱细胞异种移植修复的回顾性成本分析","authors":"G. Denoto, N. Reaven, S. Funk","doi":"10.2147/OAS.S44647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S44647","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventral hernia: retrospective cost analysis of primary repair, repair with synthetic mesh, and repair with acellular xenograft implant\",\"authors\":\"G. Denoto, N. Reaven, S. Funk\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S44647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

通讯:George DeNoto III普通外科,St Francis医院和Hofstra北岸- lij医学院,139 Plandome路,Manhasset, NY 11030, USA电话+1 516 627 5262传真+1 516 627 0641电子邮件george.denoto@chsli.org背景:本研究的目的是评估使用初级修复,合成补片或脱细胞移植修复潜在污染/感染的复杂腹疝的资源利用和成本。方法:我们使用2008 - 2009年保险索赔(Truven Health Analytics MarketScan)来识别2008年1月1日至6月30日期间接受3级或4级腹疝修补术的患者。根据现行程序术语和医疗保健通用程序编码系统代码,将患者分为合成补片组或异种移植物组,通过缺乏补片或异种移植物编码来识别初次修复。对手术后18个月期间的索赔进行了审查,以确定医疗并发症的发生率、指数后事件的数量和医院费用。结果:共纳入740例患者。在3级患者中,异种移植(18%)和初次修复(24%)的并发症发生率明显低于合成补片(37%,P = 0.001)。4级患者之间的差异很小。在3级患者中,合成补片与并发症的住院率相关,大约是异种移植修复患者的3倍,明显高于初次修复患者(P = 0.0001)。3级患者异种移植修复的平均治疗费用为33,266美元,而初级修复为34,948美元,合成补片为35,891美元(差异无统计学意义)。在4级患者中,在并发症治疗的回报率或费用方面,研究组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:在3级和4级疝修补的分析中,尽管异种移植和初次修补的并发症与合成补片相比存在一些显著差异,但三个研究组的18个月总成本相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ventral hernia: retrospective cost analysis of primary repair, repair with synthetic mesh, and repair with acellular xenograft implant
Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信