{"title":"腹疝:初次修补、合成补片修补和脱细胞异种移植修复的回顾性成本分析","authors":"G. Denoto, N. Reaven, S. Funk","doi":"10.2147/OAS.S44647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S44647","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventral hernia: retrospective cost analysis of primary repair, repair with synthetic mesh, and repair with acellular xenograft implant\",\"authors\":\"G. Denoto, N. Reaven, S. Funk\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S44647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S44647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ventral hernia: retrospective cost analysis of primary repair, repair with synthetic mesh, and repair with acellular xenograft implant
Correspondence: George DeNoto III Division of General Surgery, St Francis Hospital and Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, 139 Plandome Road, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA Tel +1 516 627 5262 Fax +1 516 627 0641 Email george.denoto@chsli.org Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate resource utilization and costs of repair of potentially contaminated/infected complex ventral hernias using primary repair, synthetic mesh, or acellular xenograft. Methods: We used 2008–2009 insurance claims (Truven Health Analytics MarketScan) to identify patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 ventral hernia repair between January 1 and June 30, 2008. Patients were categorized into synthetic mesh or xenograft groups based on Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, with primary repair identified by the absence of mesh or xenograft codes. Claims were reviewed for an 18-month post-procedure period to identify the incidence of medical complications, number of post-index events, and hospital costs. Results: A total of 740 patients were included. Complication rates in grade 3 patients were significantly lower with xenograft (18%) and primary repair (24%) versus synthetic mesh (37%, P = 0.001). There were minimal differences between grade 4 patients. In grade 3 patients, synthetic mesh was associated with hospital returns for complications about three times as often as those with xenograft repairs and significantly more often than those with primary repairs (P , 0.0001). The average treatment cost for a xenograft repair in grade 3 patients was $33,266 versus a primary repair at $34,948 and synthetic mesh at $35,891 (difference not statistically significant). In grade 4 patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the study arms in the rate of returns for treatment of complications or costs. Conclusion: In this analysis of grade 3 and 4 hernia repair, total 18-month costs were similar across the three study arms despite some significant differences in complications favoring xenograft and primary repair over synthetic mesh.
期刊介绍:
Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.