古城的宗教机构、圣化和传统

Q4 Arts and Humanities
J. Rüpke
{"title":"古城的宗教机构、圣化和传统","authors":"J. Rüpke","doi":"10.19090/I.2018.29.22-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from a discussion against the notions of a unified ‘public religion’ my focus during the past decade has been on ‘religious individualization’ and the fluidity of religion captured by the concepts of ‘lived ancient religion’ and ‘religion in the making’. These concepts focus on the inherent dynamic qualities of those cultural products that I identify as religion in the course of historical analyses. And yet, the undeniable presence of traditions and even canones can be conceptualized beyond a world of individually fragmented religious practices and beliefs and incipient, ever-changing and also dissolving institutions that would be clustered together only in the form of narrative shorthand terms by historians. The paper offers a theoretical reflection on a concept of religion useful for the question of tradition and canonization, building on earlier proposals and developing those further by developing the notion of sacralisation. This will be framed by an historical assumption, namely that the processes of interest here are pushed in urban contexts. Here, my focus will be on the ancient Mediterranean.","PeriodicalId":36264,"journal":{"name":"Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RELIGIOUS AGENCY, SACRALISATION AND TRADITION IN THE ANCIENT CITY\",\"authors\":\"J. Rüpke\",\"doi\":\"10.19090/I.2018.29.22-38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from a discussion against the notions of a unified ‘public religion’ my focus during the past decade has been on ‘religious individualization’ and the fluidity of religion captured by the concepts of ‘lived ancient religion’ and ‘religion in the making’. These concepts focus on the inherent dynamic qualities of those cultural products that I identify as religion in the course of historical analyses. And yet, the undeniable presence of traditions and even canones can be conceptualized beyond a world of individually fragmented religious practices and beliefs and incipient, ever-changing and also dissolving institutions that would be clustered together only in the form of narrative shorthand terms by historians. The paper offers a theoretical reflection on a concept of religion useful for the question of tradition and canonization, building on earlier proposals and developing those further by developing the notion of sacralisation. This will be framed by an historical assumption, namely that the processes of interest here are pushed in urban contexts. Here, my focus will be on the ancient Mediterranean.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19090/I.2018.29.22-38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/I.2018.29.22-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

从反对统一的“公共宗教”概念的讨论开始,我在过去十年中的重点是“宗教个体化”和“现存的古代宗教”和“正在形成的宗教”概念所捕捉到的宗教的流动性。这些概念关注的是我在历史分析过程中认定为宗教的那些文化产品的内在动态品质。然而,不可否认的传统,甚至是经典的存在可以被概念化,而不仅仅是一个独立的,支离破碎的宗教实践和信仰的世界,以及早期的,不断变化的,也正在解体的制度,这些制度只会以历史学家的叙述速记形式聚集在一起。本文提供了一个对传统和册封问题有用的宗教概念的理论反思,在早期建议的基础上,通过发展圣化的概念进一步发展这些建议。这将由一个历史假设构成,即这里的兴趣过程是在城市背景下推动的。在这里,我的重点是古地中海。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RELIGIOUS AGENCY, SACRALISATION AND TRADITION IN THE ANCIENT CITY
Starting from a discussion against the notions of a unified ‘public religion’ my focus during the past decade has been on ‘religious individualization’ and the fluidity of religion captured by the concepts of ‘lived ancient religion’ and ‘religion in the making’. These concepts focus on the inherent dynamic qualities of those cultural products that I identify as religion in the course of historical analyses. And yet, the undeniable presence of traditions and even canones can be conceptualized beyond a world of individually fragmented religious practices and beliefs and incipient, ever-changing and also dissolving institutions that would be clustered together only in the form of narrative shorthand terms by historians. The paper offers a theoretical reflection on a concept of religion useful for the question of tradition and canonization, building on earlier proposals and developing those further by developing the notion of sacralisation. This will be framed by an historical assumption, namely that the processes of interest here are pushed in urban contexts. Here, my focus will be on the ancient Mediterranean.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches
Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信