COVID-19免疫认证的伦理可接受性

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ann Clark
{"title":"COVID-19免疫认证的伦理可接受性","authors":"Ann Clark","doi":"10.22381/lpi2020219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an empirical study carried out to evaluate and analyze ethical acceptability of COVID-19 immunity certification. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from Ada Lovelace Institute, Censuswide, de Beaumont, Gallup, King's College London, Medscape, Promoleaf, the Serco Institute, Survation, and University of Bristol, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding the fair use of COVID19 immunity passports. Data collected from 5,200 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.","PeriodicalId":53498,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Acceptability of COVID-19 Immunity Certification\",\"authors\":\"Ann Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/lpi2020219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an empirical study carried out to evaluate and analyze ethical acceptability of COVID-19 immunity certification. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from Ada Lovelace Institute, Censuswide, de Beaumont, Gallup, King's College London, Medscape, Promoleaf, the Serco Institute, Survation, and University of Bristol, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding the fair use of COVID19 immunity passports. Data collected from 5,200 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/lpi2020219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/lpi2020219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对COVID-19免疫认证的伦理可接受性进行了实证研究。根据从Ada Lovelace研究所、Censuswide、de Beaumont、盖洛普、伦敦国王学院、Medscape、Promoleaf、Serco研究所、vation和布里斯托尔大学收集的数据,我对covid - 19免疫护照的合理使用进行了分析和估计。从5200名受访者中收集的数据将根据研究模型进行测试。在适当情况下,对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Acceptability of COVID-19 Immunity Certification
This article presents an empirical study carried out to evaluate and analyze ethical acceptability of COVID-19 immunity certification. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from Ada Lovelace Institute, Censuswide, de Beaumont, Gallup, King's College London, Medscape, Promoleaf, the Serco Institute, Survation, and University of Bristol, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding the fair use of COVID19 immunity passports. Data collected from 5,200 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信