Unamuno的镜像游戏:论语法空白中写作的看似全能和意义

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ariso Salgado, J. María
{"title":"Unamuno的镜像游戏:论语法空白中写作的看似全能和意义","authors":"Ariso Salgado, J. María","doi":"10.22381/LPI1620175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.IntroductionImagine as vividly as possible that you suddenly become blind and that, once you have comforted yourself with other sense impressions, you go deaf. Imagine that you subsequently lose not only your senses of touch, smell and taste, but also the very feeling of your members, so that you remain as an inert thing that cannot even opt for suicide. You still might take refuge in your thoughts and memories, but imagine that they gradually fade until you preserve nothing more than the mere awareness of existing. But imagine that you also end up losing such awareness. Then you are not even entirely alone, for you are already nothing, to the extent that you are not even aware of your nothingness. This fear of ceasing to exist beats in every line of the Spanish philosopher, playwright, poet and novelist Miguel de Unamuno (1994), who considered it impossible to live quietly while truly taking for granted that one's own consciousness will disappear: in his opinion, thinking about the extinction of consciousness provokes a vertigo that cannot be cured by reason. Thus, it is not biological or physical death but the dissolution of consciousness which terrifies Unamuno (1954), for he was convinced that the value and meaning of everything depends on consciousness: indeed, consciousness constitutes the guarantee to be and exist both for the universe and for the individual. On the one hand, the world exists inasmuch as it is reflected and known by consciousness, which also gives it a purpose. On the other hand, Unamuno emphasizes, following Senancour, the impossibility of conceiving ourselves as not existing. Although he is not able to imagine how nothingness - understood as the extinction of consciousness - would be like, he was gripped by the idea that his consciousness, and by extension his identity or feeling of being himself, may dissolve forever.This terror of death was motivated to a large extent by the deep mark that the deaths of some relatives, especially that of his six-year-old son in 1902, left on him. Yet terror of the dissolution of consciousness was also largely due to the fact that Unamuno associated the consciousness of being oneself with the effort to survive and go on being, that is, the effort of constantly trying to flee from being nothing. His work was addressed to readers sensitized to the possibility of losing their consciousness, but it was also intended to alert the passive individual who is indifferent to such idea. For Unamuno assumed that, once his reader had fallen prey to terror of extinction, he would aim at being all, as that is the only means to escape from being nothing. However, the objective should not consist in ending up being all, but in aiming or wishing it without ever succeeding: if someone ended up being all, he would no longer be himself because his individuality would have mixed with all and it could not be distinguished as an unique and nontransferable one. Starting from the intuition that this aim of being all should never be fulfilled, Unamuno will focus his work on the clash or embrace between reason, which denies the possibility of maintaining consciousness after death, and the wish that we become immortal and do not lose our consciousness even after having died. In his opinion, the certainty that death entails the dissolution of personal consciousness would make our lives impossible as much as the complete conviction that personal consciousness persists after death, as both would plunge us into the deepest quietism. Yet he thinks that each of us has doubts about both alternatives. Far from trying to remove this uncertainty, Unamuno wants to fan the flames of such doubt because he locates in the very basis of human life not an unconditional faith free from all doubt, but a faith which arises from doubt and uncertainty. The sense of life no longer lies in achieving a definitive goal - because establishing oneself in perfection would entail sinking into nothingness - but in continuously fighting uncertainty in order to maintain one's own consciousness. …","PeriodicalId":53498,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","volume":"16 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unamuno's Mirror-Games: On the Seeming Omnipotence and Meaningfulness of Writing in the Grammatical Void\",\"authors\":\"Ariso Salgado, J. María\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/LPI1620175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1.IntroductionImagine as vividly as possible that you suddenly become blind and that, once you have comforted yourself with other sense impressions, you go deaf. Imagine that you subsequently lose not only your senses of touch, smell and taste, but also the very feeling of your members, so that you remain as an inert thing that cannot even opt for suicide. You still might take refuge in your thoughts and memories, but imagine that they gradually fade until you preserve nothing more than the mere awareness of existing. But imagine that you also end up losing such awareness. Then you are not even entirely alone, for you are already nothing, to the extent that you are not even aware of your nothingness. This fear of ceasing to exist beats in every line of the Spanish philosopher, playwright, poet and novelist Miguel de Unamuno (1994), who considered it impossible to live quietly while truly taking for granted that one's own consciousness will disappear: in his opinion, thinking about the extinction of consciousness provokes a vertigo that cannot be cured by reason. Thus, it is not biological or physical death but the dissolution of consciousness which terrifies Unamuno (1954), for he was convinced that the value and meaning of everything depends on consciousness: indeed, consciousness constitutes the guarantee to be and exist both for the universe and for the individual. On the one hand, the world exists inasmuch as it is reflected and known by consciousness, which also gives it a purpose. On the other hand, Unamuno emphasizes, following Senancour, the impossibility of conceiving ourselves as not existing. Although he is not able to imagine how nothingness - understood as the extinction of consciousness - would be like, he was gripped by the idea that his consciousness, and by extension his identity or feeling of being himself, may dissolve forever.This terror of death was motivated to a large extent by the deep mark that the deaths of some relatives, especially that of his six-year-old son in 1902, left on him. Yet terror of the dissolution of consciousness was also largely due to the fact that Unamuno associated the consciousness of being oneself with the effort to survive and go on being, that is, the effort of constantly trying to flee from being nothing. His work was addressed to readers sensitized to the possibility of losing their consciousness, but it was also intended to alert the passive individual who is indifferent to such idea. For Unamuno assumed that, once his reader had fallen prey to terror of extinction, he would aim at being all, as that is the only means to escape from being nothing. However, the objective should not consist in ending up being all, but in aiming or wishing it without ever succeeding: if someone ended up being all, he would no longer be himself because his individuality would have mixed with all and it could not be distinguished as an unique and nontransferable one. Starting from the intuition that this aim of being all should never be fulfilled, Unamuno will focus his work on the clash or embrace between reason, which denies the possibility of maintaining consciousness after death, and the wish that we become immortal and do not lose our consciousness even after having died. In his opinion, the certainty that death entails the dissolution of personal consciousness would make our lives impossible as much as the complete conviction that personal consciousness persists after death, as both would plunge us into the deepest quietism. Yet he thinks that each of us has doubts about both alternatives. Far from trying to remove this uncertainty, Unamuno wants to fan the flames of such doubt because he locates in the very basis of human life not an unconditional faith free from all doubt, but a faith which arises from doubt and uncertainty. The sense of life no longer lies in achieving a definitive goal - because establishing oneself in perfection would entail sinking into nothingness - but in continuously fighting uncertainty in order to maintain one's own consciousness. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":53498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/LPI1620175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/LPI1620175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

1.尽可能生动地想象一下,你突然失明了,一旦你用其他感官印象安慰自己,你就聋了。想象一下,你随后不仅失去了触觉、嗅觉和味觉,还失去了身体各部分的感觉,所以你仍然是一个惰性的东西,甚至不能选择自杀。你仍然可以在你的思想和记忆中寻求庇护,但想象它们逐渐消失,直到你只保留了存在的意识。但想象一下,你最终也失去了这种意识。那么你甚至不是完全的孤独,因为你已经什么都不是,到你甚至没有觉知到你的虚无的程度。这种对停止存在的恐惧在西班牙哲学家、剧作家、诗人和小说家米格尔·德·乌纳穆诺(Miguel de Unamuno, 1994)的每一句话中都有体现,他认为,当一个人真正认为自己的意识将消失是理所当然的时候,平静地生活是不可能的:在他看来,思考意识的消失会引发一种无法用理性治愈的眩晕。因此,使Unamuno感到恐惧的不是生物或肉体的死亡,而是意识的消失(1954年),因为他深信一切事物的价值和意义都取决于意识:事实上,意识构成了宇宙和个人存在的保证。一方面,世界是存在的,因为它被意识所反映和认识,意识也赋予它目的。另一方面,乌纳穆诺强调,继塞纳库尔之后,不可能把自己想象成不存在的。虽然他无法想象虚无——被理解为意识的消失——会是什么样子,但他被一种想法所吸引,即他的意识,进而他的身份或自我感觉,可能永远消失。这种对死亡的恐惧在很大程度上是由于一些亲戚的死亡,特别是他六岁的儿子在1902年的死亡给他留下了深刻的印记。然而对意识消失的恐惧很大程度上也是由于Unamuno将自我意识与生存和继续存在的努力联系起来,也就是说,不断试图逃离虚无的努力。他的作品是针对那些对失去意识的可能性敏感的读者的,但它也意在提醒那些对这种想法漠不关心的被动个体。因为乌纳穆诺认为,一旦他的读者陷入灭绝的恐惧,他就会以成为一切为目标,因为这是摆脱虚无的唯一途径。然而,目标不应该在于最终成为一切,而应该是在没有成功的情况下瞄准或希望它:如果某人最终成为一切,他将不再是他自己,因为他的个性将与所有人混合在一起,它无法被区分为独特的和不可转移的。Unamuno将从“成为一切”的目标永远不可能实现这一直觉出发,将他的工作重点放在理性与我们的愿望之间的冲突或拥抱上,理性否认了人死后保持意识的可能性,而理性则希望我们能够长生不死,即使死后也不会失去意识。在他看来,相信死亡会导致个人意识的解体,就像完全相信个人意识在死后仍然存在一样,会使我们的生活变得不可能,因为两者都会使我们陷入最深的宁静主义。但他认为,我们每个人对这两种选择都有疑虑。乌纳穆诺并没有试图消除这种不确定性,而是想煽动这种怀疑的火焰,因为他在人类生活的基础上找到的不是一种毫无疑问的无条件信仰,而是一种从怀疑和不确定性中产生的信仰。生活的意义不再在于达到一个明确的目标——因为把自己建立在完美之中会导致陷入虚无——而是在于不断地与不确定性作斗争,以保持自己的意识。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unamuno's Mirror-Games: On the Seeming Omnipotence and Meaningfulness of Writing in the Grammatical Void
1.IntroductionImagine as vividly as possible that you suddenly become blind and that, once you have comforted yourself with other sense impressions, you go deaf. Imagine that you subsequently lose not only your senses of touch, smell and taste, but also the very feeling of your members, so that you remain as an inert thing that cannot even opt for suicide. You still might take refuge in your thoughts and memories, but imagine that they gradually fade until you preserve nothing more than the mere awareness of existing. But imagine that you also end up losing such awareness. Then you are not even entirely alone, for you are already nothing, to the extent that you are not even aware of your nothingness. This fear of ceasing to exist beats in every line of the Spanish philosopher, playwright, poet and novelist Miguel de Unamuno (1994), who considered it impossible to live quietly while truly taking for granted that one's own consciousness will disappear: in his opinion, thinking about the extinction of consciousness provokes a vertigo that cannot be cured by reason. Thus, it is not biological or physical death but the dissolution of consciousness which terrifies Unamuno (1954), for he was convinced that the value and meaning of everything depends on consciousness: indeed, consciousness constitutes the guarantee to be and exist both for the universe and for the individual. On the one hand, the world exists inasmuch as it is reflected and known by consciousness, which also gives it a purpose. On the other hand, Unamuno emphasizes, following Senancour, the impossibility of conceiving ourselves as not existing. Although he is not able to imagine how nothingness - understood as the extinction of consciousness - would be like, he was gripped by the idea that his consciousness, and by extension his identity or feeling of being himself, may dissolve forever.This terror of death was motivated to a large extent by the deep mark that the deaths of some relatives, especially that of his six-year-old son in 1902, left on him. Yet terror of the dissolution of consciousness was also largely due to the fact that Unamuno associated the consciousness of being oneself with the effort to survive and go on being, that is, the effort of constantly trying to flee from being nothing. His work was addressed to readers sensitized to the possibility of losing their consciousness, but it was also intended to alert the passive individual who is indifferent to such idea. For Unamuno assumed that, once his reader had fallen prey to terror of extinction, he would aim at being all, as that is the only means to escape from being nothing. However, the objective should not consist in ending up being all, but in aiming or wishing it without ever succeeding: if someone ended up being all, he would no longer be himself because his individuality would have mixed with all and it could not be distinguished as an unique and nontransferable one. Starting from the intuition that this aim of being all should never be fulfilled, Unamuno will focus his work on the clash or embrace between reason, which denies the possibility of maintaining consciousness after death, and the wish that we become immortal and do not lose our consciousness even after having died. In his opinion, the certainty that death entails the dissolution of personal consciousness would make our lives impossible as much as the complete conviction that personal consciousness persists after death, as both would plunge us into the deepest quietism. Yet he thinks that each of us has doubts about both alternatives. Far from trying to remove this uncertainty, Unamuno wants to fan the flames of such doubt because he locates in the very basis of human life not an unconditional faith free from all doubt, but a faith which arises from doubt and uncertainty. The sense of life no longer lies in achieving a definitive goal - because establishing oneself in perfection would entail sinking into nothingness - but in continuously fighting uncertainty in order to maintain one's own consciousness. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信