逻辑性和不变性

IF 0.7 3区 数学 Q1 LOGIC
D. Bonnay
{"title":"逻辑性和不变性","authors":"D. Bonnay","doi":"10.2178/bsl/1208358843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper deals with the problem of giving a principled characterization of the class of logical constants. According to the so-called Tarski–Sher thesis, an operation is logical iff it is invariant under permutation. In the model-theoretic tradition, this criterion has been widely accepted as giving a necessary condition for an operation to be logical. But it has been also widely criticized on the account that it counts too many operations as logical, failing thus to provide a sufficient condition. Our aim is to solve this problem of overgeneration by modifying the invariance criterion. We introduce a general notion of invariance under a similarity relation and present the connection between similarity relations and classes of invariant operations. The next task is to isolate a similarity relation well-suited for a definition of logicality. We argue that the standard arguments in favor of invariance under permutation, which rely on the generality and the formality of logic, should be modified. The revised arguments are shown to support an alternative to Tarski's criterion, according to which an operation is logical iff it is invariant under potential isomorphism.","PeriodicalId":55307,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2178/bsl/1208358843","citationCount":"90","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logicality and Invariance\",\"authors\":\"D. Bonnay\",\"doi\":\"10.2178/bsl/1208358843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper deals with the problem of giving a principled characterization of the class of logical constants. According to the so-called Tarski–Sher thesis, an operation is logical iff it is invariant under permutation. In the model-theoretic tradition, this criterion has been widely accepted as giving a necessary condition for an operation to be logical. But it has been also widely criticized on the account that it counts too many operations as logical, failing thus to provide a sufficient condition. Our aim is to solve this problem of overgeneration by modifying the invariance criterion. We introduce a general notion of invariance under a similarity relation and present the connection between similarity relations and classes of invariant operations. The next task is to isolate a similarity relation well-suited for a definition of logicality. We argue that the standard arguments in favor of invariance under permutation, which rely on the generality and the formality of logic, should be modified. The revised arguments are shown to support an alternative to Tarski's criterion, according to which an operation is logical iff it is invariant under potential isomorphism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2178/bsl/1208358843\",\"citationCount\":\"90\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1208358843\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1208358843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

摘要

摘要本文讨论了逻辑常数类的原则性刻划问题。根据所谓的Tarski-Sher命题,如果一个操作在置换下是不变的,那么它就是逻辑的。在模型理论的传统中,这个准则被广泛接受为一个操作是合乎逻辑的必要条件。但它也受到了广泛的批评,因为它将太多的操作视为逻辑,因此未能提供充分条件。我们的目标是通过修改不变性准则来解决这个过生成问题。我们引入了相似关系下不变性的一般概念,并给出了相似关系与不变性操作类之间的联系。下一个任务是分离一个非常适合逻辑定义的相似关系。我们认为,支持排列不变性的标准论证依赖于逻辑的一般性和形式化,应该加以修正。修正后的论证支持了塔斯基准则的另一种选择,根据塔斯基准则,如果一个操作在潜在同构下是不变的,那么它就是逻辑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logicality and Invariance
Abstract This paper deals with the problem of giving a principled characterization of the class of logical constants. According to the so-called Tarski–Sher thesis, an operation is logical iff it is invariant under permutation. In the model-theoretic tradition, this criterion has been widely accepted as giving a necessary condition for an operation to be logical. But it has been also widely criticized on the account that it counts too many operations as logical, failing thus to provide a sufficient condition. Our aim is to solve this problem of overgeneration by modifying the invariance criterion. We introduce a general notion of invariance under a similarity relation and present the connection between similarity relations and classes of invariant operations. The next task is to isolate a similarity relation well-suited for a definition of logicality. We argue that the standard arguments in favor of invariance under permutation, which rely on the generality and the formality of logic, should be modified. The revised arguments are shown to support an alternative to Tarski's criterion, according to which an operation is logical iff it is invariant under potential isomorphism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic was established in 1995 by the Association for Symbolic Logic to provide a journal of high standards that would be both accessible and of interest to as wide an audience as possible. It is designed to cover all areas within the purview of the ASL: mathematical logic and its applications, philosophical and non-classical logic and its applications, history and philosophy of logic, and philosophy and methodology of mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信