历史批判教育学视角下的评价

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Giselle Modé Magalhães, Ana Carolina Galvão Marsiglia
{"title":"历史批判教育学视角下的评价","authors":"Giselle Modé Magalhães, Ana Carolina Galvão Marsiglia","doi":"10.22633/RPGE.V0I15.9354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the concept of school evaluation in the perspective of Historical-Critical Pedagogy. In this paper, we present an opposition to the constructivist approach, which is actually the framework of the Ministry of Education official document (\"pedagogical guidelines for teachers training\"), as well as the Department of Education of the State of Sao Paulo (this one called \"Letter and Life\"). It is argued along this text that the verification of student´s performance should aim at redesigning and reorganizing their learning process. The authors claim that there is a contradiction between what is provided in the official documents and the actual outcomes in the assessment of students, which can be overcome with clear determination by the teacher trajectory of learning: what, to whom, for what and how to teach? We conclude that evaluation, when well driven, helps teaching more and better once that reorients teacher's actions in the arduous but noble task of providing the student ascend the concrete to the abstract and return to \"concrete thought\", increasingly its affective-cognitive development.","PeriodicalId":43023,"journal":{"name":"Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avaliação na perspectiva da Pedagogia Histórico-Crítica\",\"authors\":\"Giselle Modé Magalhães, Ana Carolina Galvão Marsiglia\",\"doi\":\"10.22633/RPGE.V0I15.9354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the concept of school evaluation in the perspective of Historical-Critical Pedagogy. In this paper, we present an opposition to the constructivist approach, which is actually the framework of the Ministry of Education official document (\\\"pedagogical guidelines for teachers training\\\"), as well as the Department of Education of the State of Sao Paulo (this one called \\\"Letter and Life\\\"). It is argued along this text that the verification of student´s performance should aim at redesigning and reorganizing their learning process. The authors claim that there is a contradiction between what is provided in the official documents and the actual outcomes in the assessment of students, which can be overcome with clear determination by the teacher trajectory of learning: what, to whom, for what and how to teach? We conclude that evaluation, when well driven, helps teaching more and better once that reorients teacher's actions in the arduous but noble task of providing the student ascend the concrete to the abstract and return to \\\"concrete thought\\\", increasingly its affective-cognitive development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22633/RPGE.V0I15.9354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22633/RPGE.V0I15.9354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从历史批判教育学的角度探讨了学校评价的概念。在本文中,我们提出了对建构主义方法的反对,这实际上是教育部官方文件(“教师培训教学指南”)的框架,以及圣保罗州教育部(这一文件名为“信与生活”)。本文认为,对学生学习成绩的验证应以重新设计和重组学生的学习过程为目标。作者声称,在官方文件中提供的内容与学生评估的实际结果之间存在矛盾,这可以通过教师学习轨迹的明确决定来克服:教什么,教给谁,教什么以及如何教?我们得出的结论是,当评估得到良好的驱动时,一旦教师在艰巨而崇高的任务中重新定位教师的行动,使学生从具体上升到抽象,回到“具体思想”,促进其情感认知发展,就可以帮助教学更多更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Avaliação na perspectiva da Pedagogia Histórico-Crítica
This article deals with the concept of school evaluation in the perspective of Historical-Critical Pedagogy. In this paper, we present an opposition to the constructivist approach, which is actually the framework of the Ministry of Education official document ("pedagogical guidelines for teachers training"), as well as the Department of Education of the State of Sao Paulo (this one called "Letter and Life"). It is argued along this text that the verification of student´s performance should aim at redesigning and reorganizing their learning process. The authors claim that there is a contradiction between what is provided in the official documents and the actual outcomes in the assessment of students, which can be overcome with clear determination by the teacher trajectory of learning: what, to whom, for what and how to teach? We conclude that evaluation, when well driven, helps teaching more and better once that reorients teacher's actions in the arduous but noble task of providing the student ascend the concrete to the abstract and return to "concrete thought", increasingly its affective-cognitive development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional
Revista on Line de Politica e Gestao Educacional EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信