基于层次分析法和PROMETHEE方法的土木工程群体决策

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
I. Marović, D. Car-Pušić, M. Šopić, K. Tijanić
{"title":"基于层次分析法和PROMETHEE方法的土木工程群体决策","authors":"I. Marović, D. Car-Pušić, M. Šopić, K. Tijanić","doi":"10.22630/pniks.2020.29.4.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE have gained increasing attention in the field of construction management as techniques for the analysis of complex situations and as decision support for decision makers. However, these two methods in themselves or their potential applications to problems of construction management are not sufficiently defined in the existing literature. The environment of group decision-making bring even more challenges. This paper consolidates and critically discusses the current knowledge on the application of AHP and PROMETHEE methods in the light of the specifics of the construction industry. A systematic literature review was used to select the contributions indexed in the databases Scopus and Web of Science. The findings indicate that the studies deal with broad topics and different aspects in different phases of civil engineering projects. This paper provides a useful reference work for researchers and practitioners interested in the application of AHP and PROMEETHEE as tools for group decision-making in civil engineering.","PeriodicalId":38397,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group decision-making in civil engineering based on AHP and PROMETHEE methods\",\"authors\":\"I. Marović, D. Car-Pušić, M. Šopić, K. Tijanić\",\"doi\":\"10.22630/pniks.2020.29.4.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE have gained increasing attention in the field of construction management as techniques for the analysis of complex situations and as decision support for decision makers. However, these two methods in themselves or their potential applications to problems of construction management are not sufficiently defined in the existing literature. The environment of group decision-making bring even more challenges. This paper consolidates and critically discusses the current knowledge on the application of AHP and PROMETHEE methods in the light of the specifics of the construction industry. A systematic literature review was used to select the contributions indexed in the databases Scopus and Web of Science. The findings indicate that the studies deal with broad topics and different aspects in different phases of civil engineering projects. This paper provides a useful reference work for researchers and practitioners interested in the application of AHP and PROMEETHEE as tools for group decision-making in civil engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22630/pniks.2020.29.4.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22630/pniks.2020.29.4.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

层次分析法(AHP)和PROMETHEE作为分析复杂情况和为决策者提供决策支持的技术,在施工管理领域受到越来越多的关注。然而,这两种方法本身或它们在施工管理问题中的潜在应用在现有文献中没有得到充分的定义。群体决策的环境带来了更多的挑战。本文结合建筑行业的具体情况,对AHP和PROMETHEE方法应用方面的现有知识进行了整合和批判性的讨论。采用系统文献综述的方法选择Scopus和Web of Science数据库中收录的论文。研究结果表明,这些研究涉及的主题广泛,涉及土木工程项目不同阶段的不同方面。本文为有兴趣将AHP和PROMEETHEE作为土木工程群体决策工具的研究人员和实践者提供了有益的参考工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group decision-making in civil engineering based on AHP and PROMETHEE methods
The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE have gained increasing attention in the field of construction management as techniques for the analysis of complex situations and as decision support for decision makers. However, these two methods in themselves or their potential applications to problems of construction management are not sufficiently defined in the existing literature. The environment of group decision-making bring even more challenges. This paper consolidates and critically discusses the current knowledge on the application of AHP and PROMETHEE methods in the light of the specifics of the construction industry. A systematic literature review was used to select the contributions indexed in the databases Scopus and Web of Science. The findings indicate that the studies deal with broad topics and different aspects in different phases of civil engineering projects. This paper provides a useful reference work for researchers and practitioners interested in the application of AHP and PROMEETHEE as tools for group decision-making in civil engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences
Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences [Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska] covers broad area of knowledge and practice on fields such as: sustainable development, landscaping of non-urbanized lands, environmental engineering, construction projects engineering land management, protection and land reclamation, environmental impact of investments, ecology, hydrology and water management, ground-water monitoring and restoration, geotechnical engineering, meteorology and connecting subjects. Authors are welcome to submit theoretical and practice-oriented papers containing detailed case studies within above mentioned disciplines. However, theoretical papers should contain part with practical application of the theory presented. Papers (in Polish or English languages) are accepted for publication after obtaining positive opinions of two reviewers. Papers published elsewhere are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信