巴西真相委员会对新闻评论的社会表征

A. D. Dias Santos, J. J. Pizarro Carrasco, Lidiane Silva De Araújo, Adriele Vieira de Lima Pinto
{"title":"巴西真相委员会对新闻评论的社会表征","authors":"A. D. Dias Santos, J. J. Pizarro Carrasco, Lidiane Silva De Araújo, Adriele Vieira de Lima Pinto","doi":"10.18543/djhr.2285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated the social representations of the Brazilian Truth Commission from the news comments about its final report released in December 2014. Method: Comments (N = 322) were collected in the three major newspapers websites in Brazil: “Folha de São Paulo”, “O Globo” and “O Estado de São Paulo” during the 48 hours following the report’s publication. They were submitted to a lexical analysis on the software Radicalized discourses justifying the violations and narratives denying the existence of a dictatorship were observed. Discussion: Results were in line with social media theories about online behavior, but they do not corroborate previous research on the social representations of the military regime and Truth Commissions in South America. \nReceived: 15 September 2021Accepted: 22 November  2021","PeriodicalId":32727,"journal":{"name":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social representations of Brazilian Truth Commission on news comments\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Dias Santos, J. J. Pizarro Carrasco, Lidiane Silva De Araújo, Adriele Vieira de Lima Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/djhr.2285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigated the social representations of the Brazilian Truth Commission from the news comments about its final report released in December 2014. Method: Comments (N = 322) were collected in the three major newspapers websites in Brazil: “Folha de São Paulo”, “O Globo” and “O Estado de São Paulo” during the 48 hours following the report’s publication. They were submitted to a lexical analysis on the software Radicalized discourses justifying the violations and narratives denying the existence of a dictatorship were observed. Discussion: Results were in line with social media theories about online behavior, but they do not corroborate previous research on the social representations of the military regime and Truth Commissions in South America. \\nReceived: 15 September 2021Accepted: 22 November  2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":32727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deusto Journal of Human Rights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deusto Journal of Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.2285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.2285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究从2014年12月发布的巴西真相委员会最终报告的新闻评论中调查了其社会形象。方法:在报告发表后的48小时内,在巴西三大报纸网站:“Folha de s O Paulo”、“O Globo”和“O Estado de s O Paulo”上收集评论(N = 322)。他们对软件进行了词汇分析,观察到激进的话语为侵犯行为辩护,否认独裁统治的存在。讨论:结果与社交媒体关于网络行为的理论是一致的,但它们并不能证实先前对南美军事政权和真相委员会的社会表征的研究。收稿日期:2021年9月15日接收日期:2021年11月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social representations of Brazilian Truth Commission on news comments
The study investigated the social representations of the Brazilian Truth Commission from the news comments about its final report released in December 2014. Method: Comments (N = 322) were collected in the three major newspapers websites in Brazil: “Folha de São Paulo”, “O Globo” and “O Estado de São Paulo” during the 48 hours following the report’s publication. They were submitted to a lexical analysis on the software Radicalized discourses justifying the violations and narratives denying the existence of a dictatorship were observed. Discussion: Results were in line with social media theories about online behavior, but they do not corroborate previous research on the social representations of the military regime and Truth Commissions in South America. Received: 15 September 2021Accepted: 22 November  2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信