莫里森之后的商业条款问题:新形式主义与新现实主义的观察

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
Joshua A. Klein
{"title":"莫里森之后的商业条款问题:新形式主义与新现实主义的观察","authors":"Joshua A. Klein","doi":"10.2307/1229598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN TRO D U CTIO N 57 1 I. REALISM AND FORMALISM IN PAST AND PRESENT COMMERCE CASES 574 A. The Historical Rise of the Realism/Formalism Dichotomy in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence 574 B. The Realist Approach Motivating Lopez and Morrison 576 C. Formal Commerce Rules in Morrison and Lopez 578 II. How PRECEDENT ON CHANNELS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES UNDERCUTS THE PRINCIPLES MOTIVATING MORRISON AND LOPEZ 584 A. The Broad Reach of the Power to Regulate Instrumentalities 584 B. The Breadth of the Power to Regulate Persons or Things in Interstate Commerce 590 C. An Invitation to Artful Legislating 594 III. WHAT'S THE POINT OF EVADABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 596 A. The Problem with a Realist Response 597 B. Why a Formalist Response Might Work Better 601 C O N CLU SIO N 604","PeriodicalId":51386,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Law Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"571-606"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1229598","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commerce Clause Questions After Morrison: Some Observations on the New Formalism and the New Realism\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1229598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IN TRO D U CTIO N 57 1 I. REALISM AND FORMALISM IN PAST AND PRESENT COMMERCE CASES 574 A. The Historical Rise of the Realism/Formalism Dichotomy in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence 574 B. The Realist Approach Motivating Lopez and Morrison 576 C. Formal Commerce Rules in Morrison and Lopez 578 II. How PRECEDENT ON CHANNELS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES UNDERCUTS THE PRINCIPLES MOTIVATING MORRISON AND LOPEZ 584 A. The Broad Reach of the Power to Regulate Instrumentalities 584 B. The Breadth of the Power to Regulate Persons or Things in Interstate Commerce 590 C. An Invitation to Artful Legislating 594 III. WHAT'S THE POINT OF EVADABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 596 A. The Problem with a Realist Response 597 B. Why a Formalist Response Might Work Better 601 C O N CLU SIO N 604\",\"PeriodicalId\":51386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford Law Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"571-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1229598\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229598\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1 .过去和现在商业案件中的现实主义和形式主义。商业条款法学中现实主义/形式主义二分法的历史兴起[74]B.现实主义方法激励洛佩兹和莫里森[76]C.莫里森和洛佩兹的正式商业规则[78]渠道和工具上的先例如何削弱了激励莫里森和洛佩兹的原则。B.在州际贸易中管制人或物的权力的广度C.对巧妙立法的邀请逃避宪法的意义是什么?596 A。现实主义反应的问题B.为什么形式主义的反应可能会更好C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commerce Clause Questions After Morrison: Some Observations on the New Formalism and the New Realism
IN TRO D U CTIO N 57 1 I. REALISM AND FORMALISM IN PAST AND PRESENT COMMERCE CASES 574 A. The Historical Rise of the Realism/Formalism Dichotomy in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence 574 B. The Realist Approach Motivating Lopez and Morrison 576 C. Formal Commerce Rules in Morrison and Lopez 578 II. How PRECEDENT ON CHANNELS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES UNDERCUTS THE PRINCIPLES MOTIVATING MORRISON AND LOPEZ 584 A. The Broad Reach of the Power to Regulate Instrumentalities 584 B. The Breadth of the Power to Regulate Persons or Things in Interstate Commerce 590 C. An Invitation to Artful Legislating 594 III. WHAT'S THE POINT OF EVADABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 596 A. The Problem with a Realist Response 597 B. Why a Formalist Response Might Work Better 601 C O N CLU SIO N 604
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信