左侧结肠癌和上直肠癌自然口标本提取术:叙述回顾

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
S. Efetov, E. Popova, A. Zubayraeva, P. Tsarkov
{"title":"左侧结肠癌和上直肠癌自然口标本提取术:叙述回顾","authors":"S. Efetov, E. Popova, A. Zubayraeva, P. Tsarkov","doi":"10.21037/ales-22-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an innovative technique, used in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. NOSES has been demonstrated as a safe and effective method in patients matching the inclusion criteria. Objective was to analyze and review articles regarding short- and long-term outcomes in NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases and reviewed the studies in English regarding NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer published until May 2022. Key Content and Findings: This literature review contains short summary of the recent articles’ results regarding NOSES in left-sided and upper rectal colon cancer. Studies showed better short-term outcomes and comparable with conventional laparoscopy long-term outcomes. Pitfalls and challenges of NOSES-studies include implementing standardized research protocols and thoughtful recruitment of patients due to the necessity of getting accurate and reproducible results. Conclusions: The advantages of NOSES in colorectal cancer treatment including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesics, faster recovery of bowel function have been described in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer treatment. Oncological outcomes do not differ with conventional laparoscopic surgery with specimen extraction via laparotomy. is LCCS patients the best treatment results. Natural orifice specimen extraction 95% 0.59 to 1.25; I = 0%; P=0.43]. Two studies provided data on the 5-year OS rate. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS between NOSES and conventional laparoscopy groups (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.40; I 2 =0%; P=0.40) (16).","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"S. Efetov, E. Popova, A. Zubayraeva, P. Tsarkov\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/ales-22-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an innovative technique, used in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. NOSES has been demonstrated as a safe and effective method in patients matching the inclusion criteria. Objective was to analyze and review articles regarding short- and long-term outcomes in NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases and reviewed the studies in English regarding NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer published until May 2022. Key Content and Findings: This literature review contains short summary of the recent articles’ results regarding NOSES in left-sided and upper rectal colon cancer. Studies showed better short-term outcomes and comparable with conventional laparoscopy long-term outcomes. Pitfalls and challenges of NOSES-studies include implementing standardized research protocols and thoughtful recruitment of patients due to the necessity of getting accurate and reproducible results. Conclusions: The advantages of NOSES in colorectal cancer treatment including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesics, faster recovery of bowel function have been described in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer treatment. Oncological outcomes do not differ with conventional laparoscopic surgery with specimen extraction via laparotomy. is LCCS patients the best treatment results. Natural orifice specimen extraction 95% 0.59 to 1.25; I = 0%; P=0.43]. Two studies provided data on the 5-year OS rate. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS between NOSES and conventional laparoscopy groups (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.40; I 2 =0%; P=0.40) (16).\",\"PeriodicalId\":8024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-22-30\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-22-30","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:自然孔口标本提取术(nose)是一项创新技术,用于结直肠癌的微创手术。鼻通气已被证明在符合纳入标准的患者中是一种安全有效的方法。目的是分析和回顾有关鼻塞治疗左侧结肠癌和上直肠癌的短期和长期结果的文章。方法:我们在PubMed和Cochrane Reviews数据库中进行了检索,并回顾了截至2022年5月发表的关于左侧结肠癌和上直肠癌鼻部病变的英文研究。主要内容和发现:这篇文献综述包含了最近关于鼻部手术治疗左侧和上直肠结肠癌的文章的简短总结。研究显示短期效果更好,与传统腹腔镜手术的长期效果相当。鼻内镜研究的缺陷和挑战包括实施标准化的研究方案和考虑周到的患者招募,因为需要获得准确和可重复的结果。结论:鼻吻合器在治疗左侧结肠癌和上直肠癌中具有减少术后疼痛和伤口并发症、术后镇痛药使用少、肠功能恢复快等优点。肿瘤预后与常规腹腔镜手术通过剖腹取标本没有差异。是LCCS患者的最佳治疗效果。自然孔口标本提取95% 0.59 ~ 1.25;I = 0%;P = 0.43)。两项研究提供了5年生存率的数据。鼻内镜组与常规腹腔镜组5年OS差异无统计学意义(HR = 0.78;95% CI: 0.43 ~ 1.40;I 2 =0%;P = 0.40)(16)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer: a narrative review
Background and Objective: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an innovative technique, used in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. NOSES has been demonstrated as a safe and effective method in patients matching the inclusion criteria. Objective was to analyze and review articles regarding short- and long-term outcomes in NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases and reviewed the studies in English regarding NOSES in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer published until May 2022. Key Content and Findings: This literature review contains short summary of the recent articles’ results regarding NOSES in left-sided and upper rectal colon cancer. Studies showed better short-term outcomes and comparable with conventional laparoscopy long-term outcomes. Pitfalls and challenges of NOSES-studies include implementing standardized research protocols and thoughtful recruitment of patients due to the necessity of getting accurate and reproducible results. Conclusions: The advantages of NOSES in colorectal cancer treatment including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesics, faster recovery of bowel function have been described in left-sided colon and upper rectal cancer treatment. Oncological outcomes do not differ with conventional laparoscopic surgery with specimen extraction via laparotomy. is LCCS patients the best treatment results. Natural orifice specimen extraction 95% 0.59 to 1.25; I = 0%; P=0.43]. Two studies provided data on the 5-year OS rate. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS between NOSES and conventional laparoscopy groups (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.40; I 2 =0%; P=0.40) (16).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信