犯罪的颜色:反对基于种族的嫌疑人描述的案例

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
B. A. Walker
{"title":"犯罪的颜色:反对基于种族的嫌疑人描述的案例","authors":"B. A. Walker","doi":"10.2307/1123720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement in the United States relies on racial identifiers as a crucial part of suspect descriptions. Unlike racial profiling, this practice is regarded as both an essential tool for law enforcement and as an unproblematic use of race. However, given the racial history of the United States, such descriptors, particularly 'Black, \" have developed in such a way to create an extremely large and unreliable category. Due to these factors, the use ofrace as a physical descriptor in suspect decisions is both discriminatory and inefficient. Employing race as an identifying characteristic allows law enforcement officers broad discretionary powers that can be used in a discrim? inatory manner, while ultimately proving counterproductive to the aims of effective law enforcement. As an alternative to using racial classifications, this Note proposes the development of a universal complexion chart that will allow officers to continue to collect the information necessary to create accu? rate suspect descriptions while lessening discriminatory impact.","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123720","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Color of Crime: The Case Against Race-Based Suspect Descriptions\",\"authors\":\"B. A. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1123720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law enforcement in the United States relies on racial identifiers as a crucial part of suspect descriptions. Unlike racial profiling, this practice is regarded as both an essential tool for law enforcement and as an unproblematic use of race. However, given the racial history of the United States, such descriptors, particularly 'Black, \\\" have developed in such a way to create an extremely large and unreliable category. Due to these factors, the use ofrace as a physical descriptor in suspect decisions is both discriminatory and inefficient. Employing race as an identifying characteristic allows law enforcement officers broad discretionary powers that can be used in a discrim? inatory manner, while ultimately proving counterproductive to the aims of effective law enforcement. As an alternative to using racial classifications, this Note proposes the development of a universal complexion chart that will allow officers to continue to collect the information necessary to create accu? rate suspect descriptions while lessening discriminatory impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123720\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123720\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

美国执法部门将种族识别作为嫌疑人描述的重要组成部分。与种族定性不同,这种做法被认为是执法的基本工具,也是对种族的毫无问题的利用。然而,考虑到美国的种族历史,这样的描述词,尤其是“黑人”,已经形成了一个极其庞大而不可靠的类别。由于这些因素,在可疑的决定中使用种族作为物理描述符既具有歧视性又效率低下。将种族作为一种识别特征允许执法人员拥有广泛的自由裁量权,可用于歧视。虽然最终证明对有效执法的目标适得其反。作为使用种族分类的替代方案,本说明建议制订一套通用肤色图表,让警务人员继续收集必要资料,以建立准确的种族分类制度。对可疑描述进行评级,同时减少歧视性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Color of Crime: The Case Against Race-Based Suspect Descriptions
Law enforcement in the United States relies on racial identifiers as a crucial part of suspect descriptions. Unlike racial profiling, this practice is regarded as both an essential tool for law enforcement and as an unproblematic use of race. However, given the racial history of the United States, such descriptors, particularly 'Black, " have developed in such a way to create an extremely large and unreliable category. Due to these factors, the use ofrace as a physical descriptor in suspect decisions is both discriminatory and inefficient. Employing race as an identifying characteristic allows law enforcement officers broad discretionary powers that can be used in a discrim? inatory manner, while ultimately proving counterproductive to the aims of effective law enforcement. As an alternative to using racial classifications, this Note proposes the development of a universal complexion chart that will allow officers to continue to collect the information necessary to create accu? rate suspect descriptions while lessening discriminatory impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Columbia Law Review is one of the world"s leading publications of legal scholarship. Founded in 1901, the Review is an independent nonprofit corporation that produces a law journal edited and published entirely by students at Columbia Law School. It is one of a handful of student-edited law journals in the nation that publish eight issues a year. The Review is the third most widely distributed and cited law review in the country. It receives about 2,000 submissions per year and selects approximately 20-25 manuscripts for publication annually, in addition to student Notes. In 2008, the Review expanded its audience with the launch of Sidebar, an online supplement to the Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信