目前在南澳大利亚州学校的天才和高级学习者的教育实践

Q2 Social Sciences
J. Jarvis, L. Henderson
{"title":"目前在南澳大利亚州学校的天才和高级学习者的教育实践","authors":"J. Jarvis, L. Henderson","doi":"10.21505/AJGE.2015.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite calls over the past several decades for increased attention to the needs of gifted and advanced learners, little is known about how South Australian schools currently identify and provide for these students. An online questionnaire was sent to all schools in the state and was completed by participants from 71 schools. Findings suggested inconsistency between schools in the combinations of measures used to identify gifted students and in the nature and content of educational provisions. Low rates of teacher professional development in gifted education were reported, despite most schools expecting classroom teachers to differentiate for gifted students and recommend students for advanced learning opportunities. Responses revealed a perceived tension between addressing the needs of gifted learners and catering for more disadvantaged groups. Few schools reported formally evaluating their provisions for gifted students. Recommendations are made for a renewed focus on the purpose and place of gifted education in South Australia (SA).","PeriodicalId":38285,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"70-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current practices in the education of gifted and advanced learners in South Australian schools\",\"authors\":\"J. Jarvis, L. Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.21505/AJGE.2015.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite calls over the past several decades for increased attention to the needs of gifted and advanced learners, little is known about how South Australian schools currently identify and provide for these students. An online questionnaire was sent to all schools in the state and was completed by participants from 71 schools. Findings suggested inconsistency between schools in the combinations of measures used to identify gifted students and in the nature and content of educational provisions. Low rates of teacher professional development in gifted education were reported, despite most schools expecting classroom teachers to differentiate for gifted students and recommend students for advanced learning opportunities. Responses revealed a perceived tension between addressing the needs of gifted learners and catering for more disadvantaged groups. Few schools reported formally evaluating their provisions for gifted students. Recommendations are made for a renewed focus on the purpose and place of gifted education in South Australia (SA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":38285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"70-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21505/AJGE.2015.0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21505/AJGE.2015.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

尽管在过去的几十年里,人们呼吁增加对天才和高级学习者需求的关注,但人们对南澳大利亚学校目前如何识别和提供这些学生知之甚少。一份在线调查问卷被发送到该州的所有学校,由71所学校的参与者完成。调查结果表明,学校之间在识别天才学生的措施组合以及教育规定的性质和内容方面存在不一致。尽管大多数学校期望课堂教师区分资优学生并推荐学生获得高级学习机会,但据报道,资优教育中教师专业发展的比例很低。调查结果显示,在满足天才学习者的需求和照顾更多弱势群体之间存在明显的紧张关系。很少有学校报告正式评估了他们为天才学生提供的条件。建议为重新关注的目的和地方资优教育在南澳大利亚州(SA)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current practices in the education of gifted and advanced learners in South Australian schools
Despite calls over the past several decades for increased attention to the needs of gifted and advanced learners, little is known about how South Australian schools currently identify and provide for these students. An online questionnaire was sent to all schools in the state and was completed by participants from 71 schools. Findings suggested inconsistency between schools in the combinations of measures used to identify gifted students and in the nature and content of educational provisions. Low rates of teacher professional development in gifted education were reported, despite most schools expecting classroom teachers to differentiate for gifted students and recommend students for advanced learning opportunities. Responses revealed a perceived tension between addressing the needs of gifted learners and catering for more disadvantaged groups. Few schools reported formally evaluating their provisions for gifted students. Recommendations are made for a renewed focus on the purpose and place of gifted education in South Australia (SA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Gifted Education
Australasian Journal of Gifted Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信