婚姻处罚的实用解决方案

Margaret Ryznar
{"title":"婚姻处罚的实用解决方案","authors":"Margaret Ryznar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2643832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The marriage penalty in the federal income tax continues to persist despite universal condemnation of it. This article proposes a novel way to eliminate the marriage penalty: to create another tax filing status for dual-income couples that earn an amount within a particular percentage of each other. This filing status would be the same as the current married filing status, except that it would offer double the rates of single filers because it accommodates two incomes.This approach represents a break from the status quo of separating single taxpayers from married ones without considering that in reality there are two types of married couples: one-income couples and two-income couples. This approach is also different from previously proposed solutions that require married couples to file as single individuals or that ignore marital status for tax reasons. Adding another filing status for only two-income married couples is a practical solution to the marriage penalty that causes the least upheaval to the general legal framework because it continues to treat spouses as a single economic unit. It has the additional attribute of no longer penalizing a significant subset of women who work and marry, as well as same-sex couples. Finally, high divorce rates, the decrease in alimony awards, and cohabitation as a substitute for marriage all support a solution to the marriage penalty, particularly one that is consistent with the general framework of treating households as a single economic unit.","PeriodicalId":82287,"journal":{"name":"Pepperdine law review","volume":"44 1","pages":"647-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Practical Solution to the Marriage Penalty\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Ryznar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2643832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The marriage penalty in the federal income tax continues to persist despite universal condemnation of it. This article proposes a novel way to eliminate the marriage penalty: to create another tax filing status for dual-income couples that earn an amount within a particular percentage of each other. This filing status would be the same as the current married filing status, except that it would offer double the rates of single filers because it accommodates two incomes.This approach represents a break from the status quo of separating single taxpayers from married ones without considering that in reality there are two types of married couples: one-income couples and two-income couples. This approach is also different from previously proposed solutions that require married couples to file as single individuals or that ignore marital status for tax reasons. Adding another filing status for only two-income married couples is a practical solution to the marriage penalty that causes the least upheaval to the general legal framework because it continues to treat spouses as a single economic unit. It has the additional attribute of no longer penalizing a significant subset of women who work and marry, as well as same-sex couples. Finally, high divorce rates, the decrease in alimony awards, and cohabitation as a substitute for marriage all support a solution to the marriage penalty, particularly one that is consistent with the general framework of treating households as a single economic unit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pepperdine law review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"647-690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pepperdine law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2643832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pepperdine law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2643832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

尽管受到普遍谴责,但联邦所得税中的婚姻罚款仍然存在。本文提出了一种消除婚姻罚款的新方法:为双收入夫妇创造另一种纳税申报身份,他们的收入在彼此的特定百分比内。这种申报状态将与目前的已婚申报状态相同,除了它将为单身申报人提供两倍的税率,因为它可以容纳两份收入。这种做法打破了将单身纳税人与已婚纳税人分开的现状,而没有考虑到实际上有两种已婚夫妇:一种收入夫妇和两种收入夫妇。这种方法也不同于之前提出的解决方案,即要求已婚夫妇作为单身个人报税,或者出于税收原因忽略婚姻状况。为只有双职工收入的已婚夫妇增加另一种申请身份,是解决婚姻处罚的一种切实可行的办法,它对一般法律框架的影响最小,因为它继续将配偶视为一个单一的经济单位。它还有一个额外的属性,即不再惩罚相当一部分工作和结婚的女性,以及同性伴侣。最后,高离婚率、赡养费的减少以及同居作为婚姻的替代品都支持解决婚姻惩罚的办法,特别是与将家庭视为单一经济单位的总体框架相一致的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Practical Solution to the Marriage Penalty
The marriage penalty in the federal income tax continues to persist despite universal condemnation of it. This article proposes a novel way to eliminate the marriage penalty: to create another tax filing status for dual-income couples that earn an amount within a particular percentage of each other. This filing status would be the same as the current married filing status, except that it would offer double the rates of single filers because it accommodates two incomes.This approach represents a break from the status quo of separating single taxpayers from married ones without considering that in reality there are two types of married couples: one-income couples and two-income couples. This approach is also different from previously proposed solutions that require married couples to file as single individuals or that ignore marital status for tax reasons. Adding another filing status for only two-income married couples is a practical solution to the marriage penalty that causes the least upheaval to the general legal framework because it continues to treat spouses as a single economic unit. It has the additional attribute of no longer penalizing a significant subset of women who work and marry, as well as same-sex couples. Finally, high divorce rates, the decrease in alimony awards, and cohabitation as a substitute for marriage all support a solution to the marriage penalty, particularly one that is consistent with the general framework of treating households as a single economic unit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信