前现代程序的读者指南

IF 0.2 4区社会学 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Legal Education Pub Date : 2015-03-30 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2587358

David L. Noll

{"title":"前现代程序的读者指南","authors":"David L. Noll","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2587358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many sources describe the general badness of procedural systems that predated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but few describe how those systems actually worked. This essay — intended as a reference for law students, law professors, and anyone else required to read and make sense of archaic judicial opinions — does just that.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"414-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reader's Guide to Pre-Modern Procedure\",\"authors\":\"David L. Noll\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2587358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many sources describe the general badness of procedural systems that predated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but few describe how those systems actually worked. This essay — intended as a reference for law students, law professors, and anyone else required to read and make sense of archaic judicial opinions — does just that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"414-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2587358\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2587358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

许多资料描述了早于《联邦民事诉讼规则》的程序制度的普遍弊端，但很少有资料描述这些制度实际上是如何运作的。这篇文章——作为法律学生、法律教授和任何需要阅读和理解古代司法意见的人的参考——就是这样做的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Reader's Guide to Pre-Modern Procedure

Many sources describe the general badness of procedural systems that predated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but few describe how those systems actually worked. This essay — intended as a reference for law students, law professors, and anyone else required to read and make sense of archaic judicial opinions — does just that.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.