在一个新兴的空间中编纂实践:来自“社会创新设计的新专业前沿”研讨会的见解

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Mariana V. Amatullo
{"title":"在一个新兴的空间中编纂实践:来自“社会创新设计的新专业前沿”研讨会的见解","authors":"Mariana V. Amatullo","doi":"10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V07/38296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a critical overview of LEAP: The New Professional Frontier in Design for Social Innovation, a first-of-its-kind symposium, which took place at Art Center College of Design in September 2013. The symposium’s main goal was to address one central issue—career pathways for designers in the social innovation context—through a pluralism of lenses that aspired to catalyze a national conversation about this professional frontier for design. Over three days, thought leaders addressed the tensions and ambiguities inherent in an emergent field and identified five topics of relevance on which to focus. A series of proposals for future pathways generated by symposium participants serve as the empirical grounding for the analysis and key ideas that are offered in this study—one that adopts a dialectical approach to make sense of the insights gained. Two principal strands of formulations emerge, which manifest from the various LEAP scenarios discussed. First, a repeated discourse about the “need to produce evidence” or “demonstrate value” from this form of design engagement appears as a central preoccupation for all. Second, there seems to be agreement that the process of articulation and validation underway will require new models of engagement and ongoing cultural change within organizational practice. The article argues that the insights we gain from the LEAP proposals also underscore a growing awareness within this community of practice of the necessity to embrace the complexity of navigating career pathways in the social realm with tools outside design as well. In this sense, the article suggests that we are prompted to embrace an articulation of the design discipline that has evolved from a linear, deterministic causality to one that lives within a complex system.","PeriodicalId":38677,"journal":{"name":"Design Principles and Practices","volume":"7 1","pages":"55-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codifying Practices in an Emergent Space: Insights from the Leap Symposium on the New Professional Frontier in Design For Social Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Mariana V. Amatullo\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V07/38296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a critical overview of LEAP: The New Professional Frontier in Design for Social Innovation, a first-of-its-kind symposium, which took place at Art Center College of Design in September 2013. The symposium’s main goal was to address one central issue—career pathways for designers in the social innovation context—through a pluralism of lenses that aspired to catalyze a national conversation about this professional frontier for design. Over three days, thought leaders addressed the tensions and ambiguities inherent in an emergent field and identified five topics of relevance on which to focus. A series of proposals for future pathways generated by symposium participants serve as the empirical grounding for the analysis and key ideas that are offered in this study—one that adopts a dialectical approach to make sense of the insights gained. Two principal strands of formulations emerge, which manifest from the various LEAP scenarios discussed. First, a repeated discourse about the “need to produce evidence” or “demonstrate value” from this form of design engagement appears as a central preoccupation for all. Second, there seems to be agreement that the process of articulation and validation underway will require new models of engagement and ongoing cultural change within organizational practice. The article argues that the insights we gain from the LEAP proposals also underscore a growing awareness within this community of practice of the necessity to embrace the complexity of navigating career pathways in the social realm with tools outside design as well. In this sense, the article suggests that we are prompted to embrace an articulation of the design discipline that has evolved from a linear, deterministic causality to one that lives within a complex system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Principles and Practices\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"55-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Principles and Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V07/38296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Principles and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/V07/38296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章对2013年9月在艺术中心设计学院举行的首次研讨会“LEAP:社会创新设计的新专业前沿”进行了批判性概述。研讨会的主要目标是通过多元化的视角来解决一个核心问题——设计师在社会创新背景下的职业道路,以期促进关于这一设计专业前沿的全国性对话。在三天的时间里,思想领袖们讨论了这个新兴领域固有的紧张关系和模糊性,并确定了需要关注的五个相关主题。研讨会参与者提出的一系列关于未来路径的建议,作为本研究提供的分析和关键思想的经验基础,本研究采用辩证的方法来理解所获得的见解。从所讨论的各种LEAP场景中,出现了两种主要的表述方式。首先,关于“需要从这种形式的设计参与中产生证据”或“证明价值”的反复论述似乎是所有人的中心关注点。其次,人们似乎一致认为,正在进行的表述和验证过程将需要新的参与模式和组织实践中正在进行的文化变革。文章认为,我们从LEAP提案中获得的见解也强调了这个实践社区中越来越多的意识,即有必要利用设计之外的工具来接受在社会领域中导航职业道路的复杂性。从这个意义上说,这篇文章建议我们应该接受从线性的、确定的因果关系发展到复杂系统中的设计原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Codifying Practices in an Emergent Space: Insights from the Leap Symposium on the New Professional Frontier in Design For Social Innovation
This article provides a critical overview of LEAP: The New Professional Frontier in Design for Social Innovation, a first-of-its-kind symposium, which took place at Art Center College of Design in September 2013. The symposium’s main goal was to address one central issue—career pathways for designers in the social innovation context—through a pluralism of lenses that aspired to catalyze a national conversation about this professional frontier for design. Over three days, thought leaders addressed the tensions and ambiguities inherent in an emergent field and identified five topics of relevance on which to focus. A series of proposals for future pathways generated by symposium participants serve as the empirical grounding for the analysis and key ideas that are offered in this study—one that adopts a dialectical approach to make sense of the insights gained. Two principal strands of formulations emerge, which manifest from the various LEAP scenarios discussed. First, a repeated discourse about the “need to produce evidence” or “demonstrate value” from this form of design engagement appears as a central preoccupation for all. Second, there seems to be agreement that the process of articulation and validation underway will require new models of engagement and ongoing cultural change within organizational practice. The article argues that the insights we gain from the LEAP proposals also underscore a growing awareness within this community of practice of the necessity to embrace the complexity of navigating career pathways in the social realm with tools outside design as well. In this sense, the article suggests that we are prompted to embrace an articulation of the design discipline that has evolved from a linear, deterministic causality to one that lives within a complex system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Design Principles and Practices
Design Principles and Practices Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信