设计合作:好的、坏的和不可想象的

Q2 Arts and Humanities
J. McCullagh, J. McFadyen
{"title":"设计合作:好的、坏的和不可想象的","authors":"J. McCullagh, J. McFadyen","doi":"10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v08/38301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conceptual paper is a study of the impact of three drivers: collaboration, interdisciplinary practice, and co-operation, which we recognise as the new imperatives for future design practitioners. Contextually, seeing national and international shifts in design, we challenged the idea of single \"mono\" design courses and questioned our own validity. Subsequently, we undertook a fundamental re-think of what an art school is for. By taking the notion of interdisciplinary design education this resulted in new curricula, a re-branding as the Manchester School of Art, and a physical resource to match our ambition. This paper articulates the design process employed in engaging staff to reflect and re-focus on the essence of an art school, and through doing this, develop a collegiate approach to the re-design of our buildings, a coming together of our distinct departments under a coherent brand, and the embedding of pedagogical collaboration through curricula in the form of the experimental Unit X. “X” enabled us to reflect back upon and question what is a subject. Ultimately, we discussed what is innovation and the place of risk-taking in learning. These tensions and questions have become ongoing debates and drivers for future developments and research.","PeriodicalId":38677,"journal":{"name":"Design Principles and Practices","volume":"8 1","pages":"17-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Collaborations: the good,the Bad, and the Unthinkable\",\"authors\":\"J. McCullagh, J. McFadyen\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v08/38301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This conceptual paper is a study of the impact of three drivers: collaboration, interdisciplinary practice, and co-operation, which we recognise as the new imperatives for future design practitioners. Contextually, seeing national and international shifts in design, we challenged the idea of single \\\"mono\\\" design courses and questioned our own validity. Subsequently, we undertook a fundamental re-think of what an art school is for. By taking the notion of interdisciplinary design education this resulted in new curricula, a re-branding as the Manchester School of Art, and a physical resource to match our ambition. This paper articulates the design process employed in engaging staff to reflect and re-focus on the essence of an art school, and through doing this, develop a collegiate approach to the re-design of our buildings, a coming together of our distinct departments under a coherent brand, and the embedding of pedagogical collaboration through curricula in the form of the experimental Unit X. “X” enabled us to reflect back upon and question what is a subject. Ultimately, we discussed what is innovation and the place of risk-taking in learning. These tensions and questions have become ongoing debates and drivers for future developments and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Principles and Practices\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"17-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Principles and Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v08/38301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Principles and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v08/38301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇概念性论文是对三个驱动因素的影响的研究:协作、跨学科实践和合作,我们认为这是未来设计从业者的新要求。在背景下,看到国内和国际设计的变化,我们挑战了单一的“单一”设计课程的想法,并质疑我们自己的有效性。随后,我们对艺术学校的意义进行了根本性的重新思考。通过采用跨学科设计教育的概念,这导致了新的课程,重新命名为曼彻斯特艺术学院,并提供了符合我们雄心壮志的物理资源。本文阐述了设计过程,通过让员工反思和重新关注艺术学校的本质,并通过这样做,开发一种学院的方法来重新设计我们的建筑,将我们不同的部门聚集在一个一致的品牌下,并通过实验单元X形式的课程嵌入教学合作。“X”使我们能够反思和质疑什么是主题。最后,我们讨论了什么是创新以及冒险在学习中的地位。这些紧张和问题已经成为持续的辩论和未来发展和研究的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design Collaborations: the good,the Bad, and the Unthinkable
This conceptual paper is a study of the impact of three drivers: collaboration, interdisciplinary practice, and co-operation, which we recognise as the new imperatives for future design practitioners. Contextually, seeing national and international shifts in design, we challenged the idea of single "mono" design courses and questioned our own validity. Subsequently, we undertook a fundamental re-think of what an art school is for. By taking the notion of interdisciplinary design education this resulted in new curricula, a re-branding as the Manchester School of Art, and a physical resource to match our ambition. This paper articulates the design process employed in engaging staff to reflect and re-focus on the essence of an art school, and through doing this, develop a collegiate approach to the re-design of our buildings, a coming together of our distinct departments under a coherent brand, and the embedding of pedagogical collaboration through curricula in the form of the experimental Unit X. “X” enabled us to reflect back upon and question what is a subject. Ultimately, we discussed what is innovation and the place of risk-taking in learning. These tensions and questions have become ongoing debates and drivers for future developments and research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Design Principles and Practices
Design Principles and Practices Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信