{"title":"卡尔·荣格和托马斯·默顿:20世纪的冷漠和冷漠传统","authors":"David Henderson","doi":"10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that despite the affinities between C.G. Jung and Thomas Merton there are striking differences between them in their uses of the notion of the self. Merton represents the apophatic tradition and Jung the kataphatic tradition. The categories of self-experience, need/desire, proximity and matrix/destination are used to explore their concepts of the self. The role of postmodernism in Merton studies and analytical psychology is discussed.","PeriodicalId":41527,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Spirituality","volume":"13 1","pages":"269-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carl Jung and Thomas Merton - Apophatic and Kataphatic Traditions in the 20th Century\",\"authors\":\"David Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that despite the affinities between C.G. Jung and Thomas Merton there are striking differences between them in their uses of the notion of the self. Merton represents the apophatic tradition and Jung the kataphatic tradition. The categories of self-experience, need/desire, proximity and matrix/destination are used to explore their concepts of the self. The role of postmodernism in Merton studies and analytical psychology is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Spirituality\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"269-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Spirituality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/SIS.13.0.504599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carl Jung and Thomas Merton - Apophatic and Kataphatic Traditions in the 20th Century
This paper argues that despite the affinities between C.G. Jung and Thomas Merton there are striking differences between them in their uses of the notion of the self. Merton represents the apophatic tradition and Jung the kataphatic tradition. The categories of self-experience, need/desire, proximity and matrix/destination are used to explore their concepts of the self. The role of postmodernism in Merton studies and analytical psychology is discussed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
