董事会会议室的性别多样性及其影响:挪威的例子是前进的道路吗?

Beate Sjåfjell
{"title":"董事会会议室的性别多样性及其影响:挪威的例子是前进的道路吗?","authors":"Beate Sjåfjell","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2536777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It seems logical and obvious that limiting oneself to only men or only women in any corporate setting may diminish the potential for constructive and open-minded discussions that bring a company forward. Detrimental group-think is a risk in any very homogenous context. Conversely, the positive effects of diversity – gender, cultural and age – are well-known. Experienced business people will tell us that having a heterogeneous board is fruitful. So in the words of one of the male contributors at the gender diversity conference at Deakin University October 2014 where this paper was presented: “why don’t they get it”? Why the resistance, or formulated positively: the very slow progress, which underpins the discussion of whether to legislate to achieve change? The example of Norway is striking here. Norway is one of the most egalitarian countries with a high level of gender equality and a high percentage of women at work. Nevertheless, as this article outlines, mandatory rules appeared necessary to bring about the desired change in the composition of the boards – business did not do this on its own, in spite of a long grace period. The explanation to why they don’t get it seems to be a combination of be path-dependency, power and money.This article goes on in Section 2 to present the coup that got us this rule as the first country in the world and its innovative legislative approach. In Section 3, the Norwegian rule is elaborated on including its background as a corporate governance initiative rather than a gender equality one and the compliance by Norwegian companies. In Section 4, the article discusses the effect of the rule after first elaborating on the challenges and uncertainties connected with such an investigation. With these caveats, the corporate governance significance of gender diversity is discussed, drawing on empirical studies of the effect on the performance of the companies. This may be especially relevant for the discussion that the Norwegian rule has inspired in many jurisdictions around the world. The article also discusses the potentially broader impact of gender diversity in the board room, including the pressing question of whether gender diversity in the board room can help companies create sustainable value within the planetary boundaries. Section 5 concludes with some reflections as to whether Norway indeed here is an example to follow.","PeriodicalId":43081,"journal":{"name":"Deakin Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Diversity in the Board Room & Its Impacts: Is the Example of Norway a Way Forward?\",\"authors\":\"Beate Sjåfjell\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2536777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It seems logical and obvious that limiting oneself to only men or only women in any corporate setting may diminish the potential for constructive and open-minded discussions that bring a company forward. Detrimental group-think is a risk in any very homogenous context. Conversely, the positive effects of diversity – gender, cultural and age – are well-known. Experienced business people will tell us that having a heterogeneous board is fruitful. So in the words of one of the male contributors at the gender diversity conference at Deakin University October 2014 where this paper was presented: “why don’t they get it”? Why the resistance, or formulated positively: the very slow progress, which underpins the discussion of whether to legislate to achieve change? The example of Norway is striking here. Norway is one of the most egalitarian countries with a high level of gender equality and a high percentage of women at work. Nevertheless, as this article outlines, mandatory rules appeared necessary to bring about the desired change in the composition of the boards – business did not do this on its own, in spite of a long grace period. The explanation to why they don’t get it seems to be a combination of be path-dependency, power and money.This article goes on in Section 2 to present the coup that got us this rule as the first country in the world and its innovative legislative approach. In Section 3, the Norwegian rule is elaborated on including its background as a corporate governance initiative rather than a gender equality one and the compliance by Norwegian companies. In Section 4, the article discusses the effect of the rule after first elaborating on the challenges and uncertainties connected with such an investigation. With these caveats, the corporate governance significance of gender diversity is discussed, drawing on empirical studies of the effect on the performance of the companies. This may be especially relevant for the discussion that the Norwegian rule has inspired in many jurisdictions around the world. The article also discusses the potentially broader impact of gender diversity in the board room, including the pressing question of whether gender diversity in the board room can help companies create sustainable value within the planetary boundaries. Section 5 concludes with some reflections as to whether Norway indeed here is an example to follow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deakin Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deakin Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2536777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deakin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2536777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在任何公司环境中,把自己局限于男性或女性可能会减少建设性和开放的讨论,从而使公司向前发展,这似乎是合乎逻辑和显而易见的。有害的群体思维在任何非常同质的环境中都是一种风险。相反,多样性的积极影响——性别、文化和年龄——是众所周知的。经验丰富的商业人士会告诉我们,拥有一个多元化的董事会是富有成效的。因此,用2014年10月迪肯大学性别多样性会议上一位男性撰稿人的话来说,这篇论文就是在那里发表的:“为什么他们不明白?”为什么阻力,或积极地表述:非常缓慢的进展,这支持了是否通过立法来实现变革的讨论?挪威的例子引人注目。挪威是最平等的国家之一,性别平等程度很高,女性在工作中的比例也很高。然而,正如本文概述的那样,强制性规则似乎是必要的,以实现董事会组成的预期变化——尽管有很长的宽限期,但企业并没有自己做到这一点。他们无法理解的原因似乎是路径依赖、权力和金钱的综合作用。本文将在第二节继续介绍使我国成为世界上第一个国家的政变及其创新的立法途径。在第3节中,详细阐述了挪威规则,包括其作为公司治理倡议而不是性别平等倡议的背景以及挪威公司的遵守情况。在第4节中,文章首先阐述了与此类调查相关的挑战和不确定性,然后讨论了该规则的影响。在此基础上,结合对公司绩效影响的实证研究,讨论了性别多样性对公司治理的意义。这可能与挪威规则在世界各地许多司法管辖区所激发的讨论特别相关。本文还讨论了董事会性别多元化的潜在更广泛影响,包括董事会性别多元化是否能帮助公司在全球范围内创造可持续价值这一紧迫问题。第5节总结了一些关于挪威是否确实是一个值得效仿的例子的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Diversity in the Board Room & Its Impacts: Is the Example of Norway a Way Forward?
It seems logical and obvious that limiting oneself to only men or only women in any corporate setting may diminish the potential for constructive and open-minded discussions that bring a company forward. Detrimental group-think is a risk in any very homogenous context. Conversely, the positive effects of diversity – gender, cultural and age – are well-known. Experienced business people will tell us that having a heterogeneous board is fruitful. So in the words of one of the male contributors at the gender diversity conference at Deakin University October 2014 where this paper was presented: “why don’t they get it”? Why the resistance, or formulated positively: the very slow progress, which underpins the discussion of whether to legislate to achieve change? The example of Norway is striking here. Norway is one of the most egalitarian countries with a high level of gender equality and a high percentage of women at work. Nevertheless, as this article outlines, mandatory rules appeared necessary to bring about the desired change in the composition of the boards – business did not do this on its own, in spite of a long grace period. The explanation to why they don’t get it seems to be a combination of be path-dependency, power and money.This article goes on in Section 2 to present the coup that got us this rule as the first country in the world and its innovative legislative approach. In Section 3, the Norwegian rule is elaborated on including its background as a corporate governance initiative rather than a gender equality one and the compliance by Norwegian companies. In Section 4, the article discusses the effect of the rule after first elaborating on the challenges and uncertainties connected with such an investigation. With these caveats, the corporate governance significance of gender diversity is discussed, drawing on empirical studies of the effect on the performance of the companies. This may be especially relevant for the discussion that the Norwegian rule has inspired in many jurisdictions around the world. The article also discusses the potentially broader impact of gender diversity in the board room, including the pressing question of whether gender diversity in the board room can help companies create sustainable value within the planetary boundaries. Section 5 concludes with some reflections as to whether Norway indeed here is an example to follow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信