在智利的马从业者承认疼痛的协议水平

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 Veterinary
Daniela Luna-Fernández, José-Manuel Yáñez-López, T. Tadich-Gallo
{"title":"在智利的马从业者承认疼痛的协议水平","authors":"Daniela Luna-Fernández, José-Manuel Yáñez-López, T. Tadich-Gallo","doi":"10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Veterinaria Mexico OA ISSN: 2448-6760 Cite this as: Luna Fernandez D, Yanez Lopez JM, Tadich Gallo TA. Level of agreement in the recognition of pain among equine practitioners in Chile. Veterinaria Mexico OA. 2016;3(1). doi: 10.21753/vmoa.3.1.356 Pain is a relevant component of animal welfare, and its appropriate recognition is essential for the establishment of effective analgesic therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines among veterinarians (equine practitioners). The effects of gender and age on pain recognition were also studied. The equine practitioners were asked to use a simple descriptive scale to score 25 digital color photographs of horses experiencing different painful conditions. The kappa coefficient for multiple raters was used to determine the degree of agreement. Descriptive statistics was used to estimate the severity of the pain, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to determine the effect of the rater’s gender and age. Thirty-four equine practitioners replied to the questionnaire. A poor level of agreement between equine practitioners was found (global kappa = 0.2871, CI 95% = 0.2032-0.3702); the agreement was stronger for those painful conditions with higher scores (maximum pain). No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found for pain scoring in relation to the practitioner’s age and gender. This study is the first in Chile to explore the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines. It emphasizes the poor level of agreement between equine practitioners in the recognition of pain, which could compromise the establishment of appropriate analgesic treatments and result in poor animal welfare. Further studies are required to determine and promote understanding of the factors affecting veterinarians’attitudes towards the recognition and management of pain in equine species. Figure 1. Photograph used in the questionnaire for evaluating pain perception using a simple descriptive scale (SDS). To qualify the intensity of pain the respondents clicked on the number that represented the pain level they perceived as described in the SDS: 1 = No pain, 2 = Mild pain, 3 = Moderate pain, 4 = Severe pain, 5 = Maximum pain.","PeriodicalId":49387,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria Mexico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level of agreement in the recognition of pain among equine practitioners in Chile\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Luna-Fernández, José-Manuel Yáñez-López, T. Tadich-Gallo\",\"doi\":\"10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Veterinaria Mexico OA ISSN: 2448-6760 Cite this as: Luna Fernandez D, Yanez Lopez JM, Tadich Gallo TA. Level of agreement in the recognition of pain among equine practitioners in Chile. Veterinaria Mexico OA. 2016;3(1). doi: 10.21753/vmoa.3.1.356 Pain is a relevant component of animal welfare, and its appropriate recognition is essential for the establishment of effective analgesic therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines among veterinarians (equine practitioners). The effects of gender and age on pain recognition were also studied. The equine practitioners were asked to use a simple descriptive scale to score 25 digital color photographs of horses experiencing different painful conditions. The kappa coefficient for multiple raters was used to determine the degree of agreement. Descriptive statistics was used to estimate the severity of the pain, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to determine the effect of the rater’s gender and age. Thirty-four equine practitioners replied to the questionnaire. A poor level of agreement between equine practitioners was found (global kappa = 0.2871, CI 95% = 0.2032-0.3702); the agreement was stronger for those painful conditions with higher scores (maximum pain). No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found for pain scoring in relation to the practitioner’s age and gender. This study is the first in Chile to explore the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines. It emphasizes the poor level of agreement between equine practitioners in the recognition of pain, which could compromise the establishment of appropriate analgesic treatments and result in poor animal welfare. Further studies are required to determine and promote understanding of the factors affecting veterinarians’attitudes towards the recognition and management of pain in equine species. Figure 1. Photograph used in the questionnaire for evaluating pain perception using a simple descriptive scale (SDS). To qualify the intensity of pain the respondents clicked on the number that represented the pain level they perceived as described in the SDS: 1 = No pain, 2 = Mild pain, 3 = Moderate pain, 4 = Severe pain, 5 = Maximum pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinaria Mexico\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinaria Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21753/VMOA.3.1.356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引用本文为:Luna Fernandez D, Yanez Lopez JM, Tadich Gallo TA。在智利的马从业者承认疼痛的协议水平。墨西哥兽医局。2016; 3(1)。疼痛是动物福利的一个相关组成部分,对其适当的认识对于建立有效的镇痛治疗是必不可少的。本研究的目的是确定兽医师(马从业人员)对马疼痛的认知水平。研究了性别和年龄对疼痛识别的影响。马从业者被要求使用简单的描述性量表对25张经历不同疼痛状况的马的数码彩色照片进行评分。使用多重评分者的kappa系数来确定一致性程度。采用描述性统计估计疼痛的严重程度,采用Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验确定评分者性别和年龄的影响。34名马术从业者回答了调查问卷。马从业者之间的一致性较差(总体kappa = 0.2871, CI 95% = 0.2032-0.3702);对于那些分数更高的疼痛状况(最大疼痛),这种一致性更强。疼痛评分与执业医师年龄、性别的关系无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。这项研究是智利首次探索马在疼痛识别方面的一致程度。它强调了马从业者之间在疼痛识别方面的不良协议水平,这可能会损害适当镇痛治疗的建立,并导致动物福利不佳。需要进一步的研究来确定和促进对影响兽医对马类疼痛的认识和处理态度的因素的理解。图1所示。使用简单描述性量表(SDS)评估疼痛感知的问卷中使用的照片。为了确定疼痛的强度,受访者点击了代表他们在SDS中所描述的疼痛水平的数字:1 =无疼痛,2 =轻度疼痛,3 =中度疼痛,4 =剧烈疼痛,5 =最大疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Level of agreement in the recognition of pain among equine practitioners in Chile
Veterinaria Mexico OA ISSN: 2448-6760 Cite this as: Luna Fernandez D, Yanez Lopez JM, Tadich Gallo TA. Level of agreement in the recognition of pain among equine practitioners in Chile. Veterinaria Mexico OA. 2016;3(1). doi: 10.21753/vmoa.3.1.356 Pain is a relevant component of animal welfare, and its appropriate recognition is essential for the establishment of effective analgesic therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines among veterinarians (equine practitioners). The effects of gender and age on pain recognition were also studied. The equine practitioners were asked to use a simple descriptive scale to score 25 digital color photographs of horses experiencing different painful conditions. The kappa coefficient for multiple raters was used to determine the degree of agreement. Descriptive statistics was used to estimate the severity of the pain, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to determine the effect of the rater’s gender and age. Thirty-four equine practitioners replied to the questionnaire. A poor level of agreement between equine practitioners was found (global kappa = 0.2871, CI 95% = 0.2032-0.3702); the agreement was stronger for those painful conditions with higher scores (maximum pain). No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found for pain scoring in relation to the practitioner’s age and gender. This study is the first in Chile to explore the level of agreement in the recognition of pain in equines. It emphasizes the poor level of agreement between equine practitioners in the recognition of pain, which could compromise the establishment of appropriate analgesic treatments and result in poor animal welfare. Further studies are required to determine and promote understanding of the factors affecting veterinarians’attitudes towards the recognition and management of pain in equine species. Figure 1. Photograph used in the questionnaire for evaluating pain perception using a simple descriptive scale (SDS). To qualify the intensity of pain the respondents clicked on the number that represented the pain level they perceived as described in the SDS: 1 = No pain, 2 = Mild pain, 3 = Moderate pain, 4 = Severe pain, 5 = Maximum pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinaria Mexico
Veterinaria Mexico VETERINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinaria México OA (ISSN 2448-6760) is an online scientific journal edited by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The journal is Open Access and follows UNAM''s initiative, to transmit knowledge free of charge to the readership and authors, with no Article Processing Charges. This journal publishes advances in Veterinary Sciences and Animal Production, and to reach more lectures across the world the journal was updated since 2014 from its predecessor printed in paper Veterinaria México (ISSN 0301-5092) and its digital version (ISSN 2007-5472).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信