恢复征用权中的必要性

IF 0.6 4区社会学 Q2 LAW

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Pub Date : 2009-05-22 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1409383

R. Bird

{"title":"恢复征用权中的必要性","authors":"R. Bird","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1409383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The necessity doctrine states that a condemnor may only take property via eminent domain that is necessary for furthering a proposed public use. With the advent of the Kelo v. City of New London decision and its deferential treatment of public use, necessity remains one of the few existing checks on government discretion in eminent domain. This article proposes a modest revival of the dormant necessity doctrine that preserves government discretion while curbing the reckless exercise of eminent domain.","PeriodicalId":46083,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"33 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviving Necessity in Eminent Domain\",\"authors\":\"R. Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1409383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The necessity doctrine states that a condemnor may only take property via eminent domain that is necessary for furthering a proposed public use. With the advent of the Kelo v. City of New London decision and its deferential treatment of public use, necessity remains one of the few existing checks on government discretion in eminent domain. This article proposes a modest revival of the dormant necessity doctrine that preserves government discretion while curbing the reckless exercise of eminent domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1409383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1409383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

必要性原则指出，谴责者只能通过征用权取得财产，这是促进拟议的公共使用所必需的。随着“凯洛诉新伦敦市”案的判决及其对公共用途的尊重，必要性仍然是对征用权中政府自由裁量权的少数现有制约之一。本文建议适度地复兴休眠的必要性原则，该原则保留政府的自由裁量权，同时遏制鲁莽地行使征用权。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reviving Necessity in Eminent Domain

The necessity doctrine states that a condemnor may only take property via eminent domain that is necessary for furthering a proposed public use. With the advent of the Kelo v. City of New London decision and its deferential treatment of public use, necessity remains one of the few existing checks on government discretion in eminent domain. This article proposes a modest revival of the dormant necessity doctrine that preserves government discretion while curbing the reckless exercise of eminent domain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy LAW-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy is published three times annually by the Harvard Society for Law & Public Policy, Inc., an organization of Harvard Law School students. The Journal is one of the most widely circulated student-edited law reviews and the nation’s leading forum for conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. The late Stephen Eberhard and former Senator and Secretary of Energy E. Spencer Abraham founded the journal twenty-eight years ago and many journal alumni have risen to prominent legal positions in the government and at the nation’s top law firms.