建立基于日常商业生活的道德框架

G. Donleavy
{"title":"建立基于日常商业生活的道德框架","authors":"G. Donleavy","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V1I2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business is increasingly concerned to reconcile investor driven pressure to perform with state driven pressure to conform (to a cascade of new regulation). Ethics generally favors the latter at the expense of the former. The ethical frameworks developed in the last few years differ from their classical predecessors, however. Integrative Social Contract Theory begins with the business contract and moves out from there to the wider society. Care theory begins with the relationship between two individual persons and moves out from there. Both theories are skeptical of the Universalist claims of classical ethical and religious frameworks and both claim to be user friendly. This paper compares and contrasts the two theories and hopes to show how the ethical lacunae in ISCT can be fixed by Care Theory. How a business would operate under the sway of Care Theory is described. Fears that Care Theory cannot be applied to business without weakening competitive strength are addressed. The paper is offered as a step towards merging ISCT and Care Theory to evolve an ethical framework for business. It would be a framework that engages fully with business realities, especially competitive realities, but that is directly and clearly guided by classical ethical principles.","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"1 1","pages":"199-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Ethical Framework Grounded in Everyday Business Life\",\"authors\":\"G. Donleavy\",\"doi\":\"10.22164/ISEA.V1I2.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business is increasingly concerned to reconcile investor driven pressure to perform with state driven pressure to conform (to a cascade of new regulation). Ethics generally favors the latter at the expense of the former. The ethical frameworks developed in the last few years differ from their classical predecessors, however. Integrative Social Contract Theory begins with the business contract and moves out from there to the wider society. Care theory begins with the relationship between two individual persons and moves out from there. Both theories are skeptical of the Universalist claims of classical ethical and religious frameworks and both claim to be user friendly. This paper compares and contrasts the two theories and hopes to show how the ethical lacunae in ISCT can be fixed by Care Theory. How a business would operate under the sway of Care Theory is described. Fears that Care Theory cannot be applied to business without weakening competitive strength are addressed. The paper is offered as a step towards merging ISCT and Care Theory to evolve an ethical framework for business. It would be a framework that engages fully with business realities, especially competitive realities, but that is directly and clearly guided by classical ethical principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"199-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V1I2.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V1I2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

企业越来越关注如何调和投资者驱动的执行压力和国家驱动的遵守(一连串新规定)的压力。伦理通常以牺牲前者为代价而支持后者。然而,最近几年发展起来的伦理框架与它们的古典前辈不同。综合社会契约理论从商业契约开始,并从那里扩展到更广泛的社会。关怀理论从两个人之间的关系开始,并以此为出发点。这两种理论都对经典伦理和宗教框架的普遍主义主张持怀疑态度,并且都声称对用户友好。本文对这两种理论进行了比较和对比,并希望通过关怀理论来弥补ISCT的伦理缺陷。描述了在关怀理论的影响下,企业将如何运作。有人担心,如果不削弱竞争实力,就不能将关怀理论应用于企业。这篇论文是将ISCT和关怀理论结合起来,形成商业道德框架的一个步骤。这将是一个完全符合商业现实,尤其是竞争现实的框架,但它是由经典伦理原则直接和明确地指导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an Ethical Framework Grounded in Everyday Business Life
Business is increasingly concerned to reconcile investor driven pressure to perform with state driven pressure to conform (to a cascade of new regulation). Ethics generally favors the latter at the expense of the former. The ethical frameworks developed in the last few years differ from their classical predecessors, however. Integrative Social Contract Theory begins with the business contract and moves out from there to the wider society. Care theory begins with the relationship between two individual persons and moves out from there. Both theories are skeptical of the Universalist claims of classical ethical and religious frameworks and both claim to be user friendly. This paper compares and contrasts the two theories and hopes to show how the ethical lacunae in ISCT can be fixed by Care Theory. How a business would operate under the sway of Care Theory is described. Fears that Care Theory cannot be applied to business without weakening competitive strength are addressed. The paper is offered as a step towards merging ISCT and Care Theory to evolve an ethical framework for business. It would be a framework that engages fully with business realities, especially competitive realities, but that is directly and clearly guided by classical ethical principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信