治疗结直肠癌的细胞减少策略:一项跨学科的全国调查结果

A. W. Chan, G. Munene, J. Weaver, A. MacLean, J. Easaw, G. Kaplan, R. Parker, E. Dixon
{"title":"治疗结直肠癌的细胞减少策略:一项跨学科的全国调查结果","authors":"A. W. Chan, G. Munene, J. Weaver, A. MacLean, J. Easaw, G. Kaplan, R. Parker, E. Dixon","doi":"10.2174/1876504120130806001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many patients are not referred to centers specializing in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies. This survey evaluates Canadian physician attitudes toward the role of cytoreduction in treating colorectal carcinomatosis. Methods: A discrete-choice questionnaire containing a hypothetical scenario surveyed physician preferences for the management of colorectal carcinomatosis. Results: Three mail-outs yielded a 49% response rate (217 responses). For synchronous colorectal carcinomatosis, 28.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 18.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis, 27.4% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 14.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis with a single liver metastasis, 24.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 4.6% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. Conclusion: Most physicians do not favor cytoreduction in the treatment of colorectal carcinomatosis. Knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve awareness regarding its utility in specific clinical scenarios.","PeriodicalId":89705,"journal":{"name":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytoreductive Strategies in the Treatment of Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin: Results of a Transdisciplinary National Survey\",\"authors\":\"A. W. Chan, G. Munene, J. Weaver, A. MacLean, J. Easaw, G. Kaplan, R. Parker, E. Dixon\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876504120130806001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Many patients are not referred to centers specializing in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies. This survey evaluates Canadian physician attitudes toward the role of cytoreduction in treating colorectal carcinomatosis. Methods: A discrete-choice questionnaire containing a hypothetical scenario surveyed physician preferences for the management of colorectal carcinomatosis. Results: Three mail-outs yielded a 49% response rate (217 responses). For synchronous colorectal carcinomatosis, 28.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 18.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis, 27.4% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 14.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis with a single liver metastasis, 24.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 4.6% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. Conclusion: Most physicians do not favor cytoreduction in the treatment of colorectal carcinomatosis. Knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve awareness regarding its utility in specific clinical scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876504120130806001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876504120130806001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:许多患者没有转介到专门治疗腹膜恶性肿瘤的中心。这项调查评估了加拿大医生对细胞减少在治疗结直肠癌中的作用的态度。方法:一份离散选择问卷,包含一个假设的场景,调查医生对结直肠癌治疗的偏好。结果:三封邮件产生了49%的回复率(217份回复)。对于同步性结直肠癌,28.6%的患者倾向于采用HIPEC联合全身化疗或不采用HIPEC联合全身化疗进行细胞减少,18.9%的患者倾向于单独采用HIPEC进行细胞减少。对于异时性癌,27.4%的患者倾向于采用HIPEC联合全身化疗或不采用HIPEC进行细胞减少,14.9%的患者倾向于单独采用HIPEC进行细胞减少。对于伴有单肝转移的异时性癌,24.6%的患者倾向于采用HIPEC联合全身化疗或不采用HIPEC联合全身化疗进行细胞减少,4.6%的患者倾向于单独采用HIPEC进行细胞减少。结论:大多数医生不赞成在结肠直肠癌的治疗中使用细胞减少术。需要知识翻译策略来提高对其在特定临床场景中的效用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cytoreductive Strategies in the Treatment of Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin: Results of a Transdisciplinary National Survey
Background: Many patients are not referred to centers specializing in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies. This survey evaluates Canadian physician attitudes toward the role of cytoreduction in treating colorectal carcinomatosis. Methods: A discrete-choice questionnaire containing a hypothetical scenario surveyed physician preferences for the management of colorectal carcinomatosis. Results: Three mail-outs yielded a 49% response rate (217 responses). For synchronous colorectal carcinomatosis, 28.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 18.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis, 27.4% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 14.9% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. For metachronous carcinomatosis with a single liver metastasis, 24.6% favoured cytoreduction with or without HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy, and 4.6% cytoreduction with HIPEC alone. Conclusion: Most physicians do not favor cytoreduction in the treatment of colorectal carcinomatosis. Knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve awareness regarding its utility in specific clinical scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信