M. Catarci, S. Ghinassi, A. Cintio, L. Montemurro, L. Pinnarelli, L. Leone, G. Longo, G. Grassi
{"title":"胃癌扩大淋巴结清扫术在西部非专科中心的实施及早期效果2010-02-19 2010-03-03 2010-04-21","authors":"M. Catarci, S. Ghinassi, A. Cintio, L. Montemurro, L. Pinnarelli, L. Leone, G. Longo, G. Grassi","doi":"10.2174/1876504101002010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimal degree of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is still matter of debate. Particularly, there are serious doubts about the reproducibility of extended lymph node dissection in western surgical units, and no studies to date have investigated factors influencing early results (mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates) during the learning curve. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analysis of 19 variables on a prospective series of 313 consecutive resections for gastric cancer performed by ten different surgeons. Endpoints were mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates, calculated within 60 days form the operation. Results: Early results were all independently influenced by the presence of comorbidities alone. ASA status III-IV vs I-II determined a higher operative mortality rate (11.9% vs 0.5%; Odds Ratio 12.3; 95% c.i. 1.53 to 98.1; p .018), a higher major morbidity rate (39.7% vs 16.6%; Odds Ratio 2.71; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 4.88; p .0008) and a higher reoperation rate (9.5% vs 2.1%; Odds Ratio 4.81; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 15.3; p .008). Conclusions: Extended lymph node dissection can be safely implemented into the clinical practice of a non-dedicated western institution by providing adequate coaching from more expert surgeons. This implementation protocol led to acceptable rates of operative morbi-mortality, independently influenced only by the comorbidity status.","PeriodicalId":89705,"journal":{"name":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","volume":"116 1","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Early Results of Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer in a Non-Specialized Western Center§~!2010-02-19~!2010-03-03~!2010-04-21~!\",\"authors\":\"M. Catarci, S. Ghinassi, A. Cintio, L. Montemurro, L. Pinnarelli, L. Leone, G. Longo, G. Grassi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876504101002010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The optimal degree of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is still matter of debate. Particularly, there are serious doubts about the reproducibility of extended lymph node dissection in western surgical units, and no studies to date have investigated factors influencing early results (mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates) during the learning curve. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analysis of 19 variables on a prospective series of 313 consecutive resections for gastric cancer performed by ten different surgeons. Endpoints were mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates, calculated within 60 days form the operation. Results: Early results were all independently influenced by the presence of comorbidities alone. ASA status III-IV vs I-II determined a higher operative mortality rate (11.9% vs 0.5%; Odds Ratio 12.3; 95% c.i. 1.53 to 98.1; p .018), a higher major morbidity rate (39.7% vs 16.6%; Odds Ratio 2.71; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 4.88; p .0008) and a higher reoperation rate (9.5% vs 2.1%; Odds Ratio 4.81; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 15.3; p .008). Conclusions: Extended lymph node dissection can be safely implemented into the clinical practice of a non-dedicated western institution by providing adequate coaching from more expert surgeons. This implementation protocol led to acceptable rates of operative morbi-mortality, independently influenced only by the comorbidity status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"4-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876504101002010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open surgical oncology journal (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876504101002010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:胃癌的最佳淋巴结清扫程度仍有争议。特别是,西方外科单位对扩大淋巴结清扫的可重复性存在严重怀疑,迄今为止还没有研究调查学习曲线中影响早期结果(死亡率、主要发病率和再手术率)的因素。方法:对10位不同外科医生进行的313例连续胃癌切除术的前瞻性研究进行单因素和多因素分析,共19个变量。终点为手术后60天内的死亡率、主要发病率和再手术率。结果:早期的结果都独立地受到合并症存在的影响。ASA状态III-IV vs I-II决定了更高的手术死亡率(11.9% vs 0.5%;优势比12.3;95% c.i. 1.53至98.1;P .018),主要发病率较高(39.7% vs . 16.6%;优势比2.71;95% c.i. 1.51至4.88;P .0008)和更高的再手术率(9.5% vs 2.1%;优势比4.81;95% c.i. 1.51至15.3;.008页)。结论:在非专业的西方机构中,通过更多专业外科医生的指导,可以安全地实施淋巴结清扫术。该实施方案导致了可接受的手术发病率-死亡率,仅受合并症状态的独立影响。
Implementation and Early Results of Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer in a Non-Specialized Western Center§~!2010-02-19~!2010-03-03~!2010-04-21~!
Background: The optimal degree of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is still matter of debate. Particularly, there are serious doubts about the reproducibility of extended lymph node dissection in western surgical units, and no studies to date have investigated factors influencing early results (mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates) during the learning curve. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analysis of 19 variables on a prospective series of 313 consecutive resections for gastric cancer performed by ten different surgeons. Endpoints were mortality, major morbidity and reoperation rates, calculated within 60 days form the operation. Results: Early results were all independently influenced by the presence of comorbidities alone. ASA status III-IV vs I-II determined a higher operative mortality rate (11.9% vs 0.5%; Odds Ratio 12.3; 95% c.i. 1.53 to 98.1; p .018), a higher major morbidity rate (39.7% vs 16.6%; Odds Ratio 2.71; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 4.88; p .0008) and a higher reoperation rate (9.5% vs 2.1%; Odds Ratio 4.81; 95% c.i. 1.51 to 15.3; p .008). Conclusions: Extended lymph node dissection can be safely implemented into the clinical practice of a non-dedicated western institution by providing adequate coaching from more expert surgeons. This implementation protocol led to acceptable rates of operative morbi-mortality, independently influenced only by the comorbidity status.