{"title":"婚姻平等，美国诉温莎案，以及平等保护法理学的危机","authors":"S. Pollvogt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2350973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reads United States v. Windsor as a tacit admission of the failure of the traditional doctrinal features of equal protection analysis and examines the problems that might have been raised had the Court applied those traditional doctrines to the problem of marriage equality.","PeriodicalId":81461,"journal":{"name":"Hofstra law review","volume":"42 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marriage Equality, United States v. Windsor , and the Crisis in Equal Protection Jurisprudence\",\"authors\":\"S. Pollvogt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2350973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reads United States v. Windsor as a tacit admission of the failure of the traditional doctrinal features of equal protection analysis and examines the problems that might have been raised had the Court applied those traditional doctrines to the problem of marriage equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hofstra law review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hofstra law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2350973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hofstra law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2350973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marriage Equality, United States v. Windsor , and the Crisis in Equal Protection Jurisprudence
This essay reads United States v. Windsor as a tacit admission of the failure of the traditional doctrinal features of equal protection analysis and examines the problems that might have been raised had the Court applied those traditional doctrines to the problem of marriage equality.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
