{"title":"从Walras的物理学嫉妒到Winiarski的Mécanique Sociale","authors":"François Allisson, T. Mueller","doi":"10.19272/201806102005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1898-1900, Leon Winiarski published his Mecanique sociale as an attempt to extend Walras's general equilibrium theory from the field of economics to the whole spectrum of the social sciences. This was done through an abundant use of analogies, including physical analogies. Given Walras's own physics envy, Winiarski felt encouraged by his elder to pursue his project in this way. This paper asks whether Winiarski's Mecanique sociale was an attempt to seriously take into account Walras's physics envy. To answer this question, we reconsider Winiarski's interpretation of Walras's general equilibrium theory, by focusing on a particular footnote found in Winiarski’s writings.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Walras's Physics Envy To Winiarski's Mécanique Sociale\",\"authors\":\"François Allisson, T. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.19272/201806102005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1898-1900, Leon Winiarski published his Mecanique sociale as an attempt to extend Walras's general equilibrium theory from the field of economics to the whole spectrum of the social sciences. This was done through an abundant use of analogies, including physical analogies. Given Walras's own physics envy, Winiarski felt encouraged by his elder to pursue his project in this way. This paper asks whether Winiarski's Mecanique sociale was an attempt to seriously take into account Walras's physics envy. To answer this question, we reconsider Winiarski's interpretation of Walras's general equilibrium theory, by focusing on a particular footnote found in Winiarski’s writings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"103-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19272/201806102005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201806102005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Walras's Physics Envy To Winiarski's Mécanique Sociale
In 1898-1900, Leon Winiarski published his Mecanique sociale as an attempt to extend Walras's general equilibrium theory from the field of economics to the whole spectrum of the social sciences. This was done through an abundant use of analogies, including physical analogies. Given Walras's own physics envy, Winiarski felt encouraged by his elder to pursue his project in this way. This paper asks whether Winiarski's Mecanique sociale was an attempt to seriously take into account Walras's physics envy. To answer this question, we reconsider Winiarski's interpretation of Walras's general equilibrium theory, by focusing on a particular footnote found in Winiarski’s writings.
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.