卡尔·拉赫纳对当代天主教神学的持久意义

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
P. Murray
{"title":"卡尔·拉赫纳对当代天主教神学的持久意义","authors":"P. Murray","doi":"10.2143/LS.29.1.505245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay starts out by identifying two contrary but equally inadequate ways in which to receive Rahner’s theological legacy, each of which serves to distort and diminish his true lasting significance for contemporary Catholic theology. Where one would treat his work as a new orthodoxy and narrow the task of interpretation to a self-enclosed Rahnerian scholasticism, the other would succumb to a simplistic construal of the relationship between Rahner’s progressivism and the more conservatively inclined counter-forces that now prevail. The central constructive counter-claim of this essay is that honouring Rahner’s legacy requires us to continue and extend his characteristic concern to explore rigorously yet imaginatively how Catholic thought and practice can be authentically renewed and refashioned in the various particular situations in which it finds itself. This claim is pressed in four phases: I. brief review of story and influence; II. resume of key critical reactions; III. outline of some significant fresh readings and IV. reflections on Rahner’s lasting significance proper.","PeriodicalId":41540,"journal":{"name":"Louvain Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/LS.29.1.505245","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lasting Significance of Karl Rahner for Contemporary Catholic Theology\",\"authors\":\"P. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/LS.29.1.505245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay starts out by identifying two contrary but equally inadequate ways in which to receive Rahner’s theological legacy, each of which serves to distort and diminish his true lasting significance for contemporary Catholic theology. Where one would treat his work as a new orthodoxy and narrow the task of interpretation to a self-enclosed Rahnerian scholasticism, the other would succumb to a simplistic construal of the relationship between Rahner’s progressivism and the more conservatively inclined counter-forces that now prevail. The central constructive counter-claim of this essay is that honouring Rahner’s legacy requires us to continue and extend his characteristic concern to explore rigorously yet imaginatively how Catholic thought and practice can be authentically renewed and refashioned in the various particular situations in which it finds itself. This claim is pressed in four phases: I. brief review of story and influence; II. resume of key critical reactions; III. outline of some significant fresh readings and IV. reflections on Rahner’s lasting significance proper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Louvain Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/LS.29.1.505245\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Louvain Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.29.1.505245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louvain Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.29.1.505245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文首先确定了两种相反但同样不充分的方式来接受拉赫纳的神学遗产,每一种方式都扭曲和削弱了他对当代天主教神学的真正持久意义。一个人将他的作品视为一种新的正统,并将解释的任务缩小到自我封闭的拉赫尼经院哲学,另一个人则屈服于对拉赫纳的进步主义与现在盛行的更保守倾向的反力量之间关系的简单化解释。这篇文章的核心建设性反驳主张是,尊重拉纳的遗产要求我们继续并扩展他特有的关注,以严谨而富有想象力的方式探索天主教的思想和实践如何在它发现自己的各种特殊情况下真正地更新和重塑。这一主张分为四个阶段:1 .简要回顾故事和影响;2关键反应的恢复;3概述一些重要的新阅读和反思拉赫纳的持久意义适当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Lasting Significance of Karl Rahner for Contemporary Catholic Theology
This essay starts out by identifying two contrary but equally inadequate ways in which to receive Rahner’s theological legacy, each of which serves to distort and diminish his true lasting significance for contemporary Catholic theology. Where one would treat his work as a new orthodoxy and narrow the task of interpretation to a self-enclosed Rahnerian scholasticism, the other would succumb to a simplistic construal of the relationship between Rahner’s progressivism and the more conservatively inclined counter-forces that now prevail. The central constructive counter-claim of this essay is that honouring Rahner’s legacy requires us to continue and extend his characteristic concern to explore rigorously yet imaginatively how Catholic thought and practice can be authentically renewed and refashioned in the various particular situations in which it finds itself. This claim is pressed in four phases: I. brief review of story and influence; II. resume of key critical reactions; III. outline of some significant fresh readings and IV. reflections on Rahner’s lasting significance proper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Louvain Studies
Louvain Studies RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信