在临床教育书面反馈中提出的问题:一份研究报告

Shannon Emmerson, Gina D. Tillard, T. Ormond, R. Ramsay, Brooke Moore
{"title":"在临床教育书面反馈中提出的问题:一份研究报告","authors":"Shannon Emmerson, Gina D. Tillard, T. Ormond, R. Ramsay, Brooke Moore","doi":"10.2174/1874943701104010028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical educators use a variety of methods to facilitate student development of critical thinking. One method is the use of effective questioning within written feedback. High level questions help to facilitate critical thinking by requiring the student to evaluate or make judgment on a clinical situation. As students progress through a continuum of competency from novice to graduate, the nature of feedback changes from directives to questions in response to the students' developing critical thinking abilities. This research notes details aspects in written feedback within a speech pathology educational setting. Novice students received lower level questions and more directives compared to advanced students. Suggestions for monitoring the ways in which questions are presented within written feedback are discussed.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"28-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questions Posed within Written Feedback in Clinical Education: A Research Note\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Emmerson, Gina D. Tillard, T. Ormond, R. Ramsay, Brooke Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874943701104010028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical educators use a variety of methods to facilitate student development of critical thinking. One method is the use of effective questioning within written feedback. High level questions help to facilitate critical thinking by requiring the student to evaluate or make judgment on a clinical situation. As students progress through a continuum of competency from novice to graduate, the nature of feedback changes from directives to questions in response to the students' developing critical thinking abilities. This research notes details aspects in written feedback within a speech pathology educational setting. Novice students received lower level questions and more directives compared to advanced students. Suggestions for monitoring the ways in which questions are presented within written feedback are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"28-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701104010028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701104010028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

临床教育工作者使用各种方法来促进学生批判性思维的发展。一种方法是在书面反馈中使用有效的提问。高水平的问题通过要求学生对临床情况进行评估或判断,有助于促进批判性思维。随着学生从新手到毕业生的连续能力的进步,反馈的性质从指示转变为问题,以回应学生发展的批判性思维能力。本研究记录了语言病理学教育背景下书面反馈的细节。与高级学生相比,初级学生收到的问题水平较低,指示更多。讨论了在书面反馈中监控问题提出方式的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questions Posed within Written Feedback in Clinical Education: A Research Note
Clinical educators use a variety of methods to facilitate student development of critical thinking. One method is the use of effective questioning within written feedback. High level questions help to facilitate critical thinking by requiring the student to evaluate or make judgment on a clinical situation. As students progress through a continuum of competency from novice to graduate, the nature of feedback changes from directives to questions in response to the students' developing critical thinking abilities. This research notes details aspects in written feedback within a speech pathology educational setting. Novice students received lower level questions and more directives compared to advanced students. Suggestions for monitoring the ways in which questions are presented within written feedback are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信