原发性膝关节置换术后的环境、临床途径、快速通道和康复:文献综述

M. Benedetti, D. Sarti, S. Stagni, E. Mariani
{"title":"原发性膝关节置换术后的环境、临床途径、快速通道和康复:文献综述","authors":"M. Benedetti, D. Sarti, S. Stagni, E. Mariani","doi":"10.2174/1874943701508010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the high incidence of total knee replacements, it is important to identify the most efficient yet cost- effective rehabilitation program, in order to optimize patient care within the constraints of the National Healthcare System. This paper aimed at reviewing the literature on post-acute Total Knee Replacement (TKR) rehabilitation discharge setting, and on the strategies for early discharge of TKR patients from orthopedic wards. Research studies on the effectiveness of rehabilitation in intensive rehabilitation care, skilled nursing facilities, home rehabilitation, fast-tracks, enhanced recovery and clinical pathways in total knee replacement patients have been reviewed. Length of stay following knee arthroplasty is influenced by the following factors: age, sex, marital status, co-morbidity, preoperative use of walking aids, pre and postoperative hemoglobin levels, the need for blood transfusion, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score and time between surgery and mobilization. Clinical pathways and fast tracks seem to be effective in reducing length of stay without increasing clinical complications. However, despite the vast quantity of literature available, results remain inconclusive. There is no clear evidence supporting an algorithm for the optimal rehabilitation management after total knee replacement. Beside the question of which setting or path is preferable in terms of organization, the review enlightens that it is relevant also gaining a deeper understanding of the most important predictors of the best outcomes. There is a need to review criteria for admitting total knee arthroplasty patients to intensive rehabilitation, to start a \"fast- track\" protocol, to build \"Clinical Pathways\" and to discharge patients to home rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting, Clinical Pathways, Fast-Track and Rehabilitation FollowingPrimary Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"M. Benedetti, D. Sarti, S. Stagni, E. Mariani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874943701508010017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In view of the high incidence of total knee replacements, it is important to identify the most efficient yet cost- effective rehabilitation program, in order to optimize patient care within the constraints of the National Healthcare System. This paper aimed at reviewing the literature on post-acute Total Knee Replacement (TKR) rehabilitation discharge setting, and on the strategies for early discharge of TKR patients from orthopedic wards. Research studies on the effectiveness of rehabilitation in intensive rehabilitation care, skilled nursing facilities, home rehabilitation, fast-tracks, enhanced recovery and clinical pathways in total knee replacement patients have been reviewed. Length of stay following knee arthroplasty is influenced by the following factors: age, sex, marital status, co-morbidity, preoperative use of walking aids, pre and postoperative hemoglobin levels, the need for blood transfusion, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score and time between surgery and mobilization. Clinical pathways and fast tracks seem to be effective in reducing length of stay without increasing clinical complications. However, despite the vast quantity of literature available, results remain inconclusive. There is no clear evidence supporting an algorithm for the optimal rehabilitation management after total knee replacement. Beside the question of which setting or path is preferable in terms of organization, the review enlightens that it is relevant also gaining a deeper understanding of the most important predictors of the best outcomes. There is a need to review criteria for admitting total knee arthroplasty patients to intensive rehabilitation, to start a \\\"fast- track\\\" protocol, to build \\\"Clinical Pathways\\\" and to discharge patients to home rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701508010017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701508010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

鉴于全膝关节置换术的高发病率,确定最有效且最具成本效益的康复方案,以在国家医疗保健系统的限制下优化患者护理是很重要的。本文旨在回顾有关急性全膝关节置换术(TKR)后康复出院设置的文献,以及TKR患者早期出院骨科病房的策略。综述了全膝关节置换术患者在强化康复护理、熟练护理设施、家庭康复、快速康复、增强康复和临床途径等方面康复效果的研究。膝关节置换术后的住院时间受以下因素的影响:年龄、性别、婚姻状况、合并症、术前助行器的使用、术前和术后血红蛋白水平、输血需求、ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)评分以及手术和活动之间的时间。临床路径和快速通道似乎在减少住院时间而不增加临床并发症方面有效。然而,尽管有大量的文献,结果仍然是不确定的。没有明确的证据支持全膝关节置换术后最佳康复管理算法。除了在组织方面哪种设置或路径更可取的问题之外,回顾还揭示了对最佳结果的最重要预测因素的更深入理解也是相关的。有必要审查全膝关节置换术患者接受强化康复的标准,启动“快速通道”协议,建立“临床路径”,并使患者出院到家庭康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setting, Clinical Pathways, Fast-Track and Rehabilitation FollowingPrimary Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review
In view of the high incidence of total knee replacements, it is important to identify the most efficient yet cost- effective rehabilitation program, in order to optimize patient care within the constraints of the National Healthcare System. This paper aimed at reviewing the literature on post-acute Total Knee Replacement (TKR) rehabilitation discharge setting, and on the strategies for early discharge of TKR patients from orthopedic wards. Research studies on the effectiveness of rehabilitation in intensive rehabilitation care, skilled nursing facilities, home rehabilitation, fast-tracks, enhanced recovery and clinical pathways in total knee replacement patients have been reviewed. Length of stay following knee arthroplasty is influenced by the following factors: age, sex, marital status, co-morbidity, preoperative use of walking aids, pre and postoperative hemoglobin levels, the need for blood transfusion, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score and time between surgery and mobilization. Clinical pathways and fast tracks seem to be effective in reducing length of stay without increasing clinical complications. However, despite the vast quantity of literature available, results remain inconclusive. There is no clear evidence supporting an algorithm for the optimal rehabilitation management after total knee replacement. Beside the question of which setting or path is preferable in terms of organization, the review enlightens that it is relevant also gaining a deeper understanding of the most important predictors of the best outcomes. There is a need to review criteria for admitting total knee arthroplasty patients to intensive rehabilitation, to start a "fast- track" protocol, to build "Clinical Pathways" and to discharge patients to home rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信