创伤性脊髓损伤康复后重返工作岗位报告的持续重返工作岗位的障碍

G. Murphy, M. Jackson
{"title":"创伤性脊髓损伤康复后重返工作岗位报告的持续重返工作岗位的障碍","authors":"G. Murphy, M. Jackson","doi":"10.2174/1874943701306010021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The first aim of this cross-sectional survey was to assess the reasons given by people with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) for leaving a job that they had secured after sustaining injury. The second aim was to examine the extent to which these reasons were compatible with a previously-developed framework for understanding organizational behaviors such as leaving a position of employment. Method: Thirty tSCI patients who left a position of employment which had been secured following the injury were interviewed, and asked to report the factors associated with their withdrawal from that position of employment. Results: A large number of factors were reportedly involved in the withdrawals. These factors mirrored were those which have been identified as influencing organizational behavior among the general workforce (characteristics of the individual, of the job, and of the wider environment). The ratio of factors involved was, respectively, 8:8:1. Within the environmental factors, micro-level factors were more prevalent than macro-level factors (in the ratio of 2:1). Conclusions: As many of the individual, job, and health-related reasons are essentially immutable, the environmental factors offer more promise for the development of preventive interventions to minimize unnecessary job loss. Prominent among these environmental factors targeted in interventions would be the workplace-related factor of social support.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Sustained Return-to-Work Reported by those Returning to Work Post Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"G. Murphy, M. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874943701306010021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The first aim of this cross-sectional survey was to assess the reasons given by people with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) for leaving a job that they had secured after sustaining injury. The second aim was to examine the extent to which these reasons were compatible with a previously-developed framework for understanding organizational behaviors such as leaving a position of employment. Method: Thirty tSCI patients who left a position of employment which had been secured following the injury were interviewed, and asked to report the factors associated with their withdrawal from that position of employment. Results: A large number of factors were reportedly involved in the withdrawals. These factors mirrored were those which have been identified as influencing organizational behavior among the general workforce (characteristics of the individual, of the job, and of the wider environment). The ratio of factors involved was, respectively, 8:8:1. Within the environmental factors, micro-level factors were more prevalent than macro-level factors (in the ratio of 2:1). Conclusions: As many of the individual, job, and health-related reasons are essentially immutable, the environmental factors offer more promise for the development of preventive interventions to minimize unnecessary job loss. Prominent among these environmental factors targeted in interventions would be the workplace-related factor of social support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"21-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701306010021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874943701306010021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本横断面调查的第一个目的是评估创伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)患者在持续受伤后离职的原因。第二个目的是检查这些原因在多大程度上与先前开发的理解组织行为(如离职)的框架相一致。方法:对30例损伤后离职的tSCI患者进行访谈,询问其离职的相关因素。结果:据报道,许多因素涉及到退出。这些因素反映了那些被确定为影响一般劳动力的组织行为的因素(个人、工作和更广泛环境的特征)。所涉及因素的比例分别为8:8:1。在环境因素中,微观层面的因素比宏观层面的因素更为普遍(比例为2:1)。结论:由于许多个人、工作和健康相关的原因本质上是不可改变的,环境因素为预防性干预措施的发展提供了更多的希望,以尽量减少不必要的失业。在这些以干预措施为目标的环境因素中,突出的是与工作场所有关的社会支持因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to Sustained Return-to-Work Reported by those Returning to Work Post Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Aim: The first aim of this cross-sectional survey was to assess the reasons given by people with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) for leaving a job that they had secured after sustaining injury. The second aim was to examine the extent to which these reasons were compatible with a previously-developed framework for understanding organizational behaviors such as leaving a position of employment. Method: Thirty tSCI patients who left a position of employment which had been secured following the injury were interviewed, and asked to report the factors associated with their withdrawal from that position of employment. Results: A large number of factors were reportedly involved in the withdrawals. These factors mirrored were those which have been identified as influencing organizational behavior among the general workforce (characteristics of the individual, of the job, and of the wider environment). The ratio of factors involved was, respectively, 8:8:1. Within the environmental factors, micro-level factors were more prevalent than macro-level factors (in the ratio of 2:1). Conclusions: As many of the individual, job, and health-related reasons are essentially immutable, the environmental factors offer more promise for the development of preventive interventions to minimize unnecessary job loss. Prominent among these environmental factors targeted in interventions would be the workplace-related factor of social support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信