反复使用摇头丸/MDMA的成本效益比恶化

The open addiction journal Pub Date : 2011-03-29 DOI:10.2174/1874941001104010038

A. O'Sullivan, A. Parrott

{"title":"反复使用摇头丸/MDMA的成本效益比恶化","authors":"A. O'Sullivan, A. Parrott","doi":"10.2174/1874941001104010038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"68 recreational Ecstasy/MDMA users were categorized into four subgroups: light versus heavy users (+20 occasions lifetime), subdivided into current and former users (usage within 6 months). Each unpaid volunteer completed a questionnaire about their personal experiences on Ecstasy/MDMA. The four questions here covered experiences the first and last times on Ecstasy. Positive effects were assessed using a ten-point rating scale from 1 (none) to 10 (maximum), while ‘negative’ effects were","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"38-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deteriorating Cost-Benefit Ratios for Ecstasy/MDMA with Repeated Usage\",\"authors\":\"A. O'Sullivan, A. Parrott\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874941001104010038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"68 recreational Ecstasy/MDMA users were categorized into four subgroups: light versus heavy users (+20 occasions lifetime), subdivided into current and former users (usage within 6 months). Each unpaid volunteer completed a questionnaire about their personal experiences on Ecstasy/MDMA. The four questions here covered experiences the first and last times on Ecstasy. Positive effects were assessed using a ten-point rating scale from 1 (none) to 10 (maximum), while ‘negative’ effects were\",\"PeriodicalId\":89289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"38-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

68名娱乐性摇头丸/MDMA使用者被分为四个亚组:轻度使用者和重度使用者(生命周期+20次)，再细分为现在和以前的使用者(6个月内使用)。每个志愿者都完成了一份关于他们对摇头丸/MDMA的个人体验的问卷。这四个问题涵盖了第一次和最后一次服用摇头丸的经历。积极影响采用10分制量表进行评估，从1(无)到10(最高)，而“消极”影响则采用10分制

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Deteriorating Cost-Benefit Ratios for Ecstasy/MDMA with Repeated Usage

68 recreational Ecstasy/MDMA users were categorized into four subgroups: light versus heavy users (+20 occasions lifetime), subdivided into current and former users (usage within 6 months). Each unpaid volunteer completed a questionnaire about their personal experiences on Ecstasy/MDMA. The four questions here covered experiences the first and last times on Ecstasy. Positive effects were assessed using a ten-point rating scale from 1 (none) to 10 (maximum), while ‘negative’ effects were

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The open addiction journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量